A college professor and a cardiologist enjoy playing tennis on Saturday mornings. They both give up time with their families to have a tennis match each Saturday. The college professor earns $60,000/year while the cardiologist averages an annual income of $250,000. Is the opportunity cost of playing tennis the same for both individuals? Why or why not?

A college professor and a cardiologist enjoy playing tennis on Saturday mornings. They both give up time with their families to have a tennis match each Saturday. The college professor earns $60,000/year while the cardiologist averages an annual income of $250,000. Is the opportunity cost of playing tennis the same for both individuals? Why or why not?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Tom, Dick, and Harry live in the same apartment building in downtown Los Angeles. Tom and Dick work at local auto parts stores, and each of them has an income of y dollars per week. Harry is less fortunate. He used to have a good job at the LAPD, but his penchant for firing large caliber weapons in crowded public places led to his dismissal. He currently has no income. Tom and Dick (who are originally from Texas) firmly believe in a man’s right to draw his gun in the defence of just about anything, and are happy to financially support Harry. Tom gives Harry zT dollars each week, and Dick gives Harry zD dollars each week Tom’s utility UT depends upon the dollar value of his own weekly consumption, cT , and of Harry’s weekly consumption, cH : Likewise, Dick’s utility UD depends upon the dollar value of his own weekly consumption, cD, and of Harry’s weekly consumption: Harry spends all of the money that he receives from Tom and Dick. Tom and Dick spend…
You have a dozen shirts and your roommate has six pairs of shoes worth roughly the same amount of money. You decide to swap six shirts for three pairs of shoes. In financial terms, neither of you gains anything. Explain why you are nevertheless both likely to be better off.
The following table shows how much utility Taran gets from watching his favorite teams, measured in "utils" (units of satisfaction). Team Manchester United Seattle Kraken Seattle Mariners Seattle Seahawks Seattle Sounders Seattle Storm Utils 145 127 148 142 131 135 Suppose Taran can only watch one of his favorite teams play. Assuming the cost to watch each team is the same, which team will Taran choose to watch?
You are a professor of economics at a university. You've been offered the position of serving as department head, which comes with an annual salary that is $6,500 higher than your current salary. However, the position will require you to work 200 additional hours per year. Suppose the next best use of your time is spending it with your family, which has value of $20 per hour. What is the difference in the net benefit from becoming the departmenthead? The change in net benefit is (Enter your response as an integer.) To optimize, you ▼ should or should not become a department head.
Jane enrolled in an online class to learn a new language. The online class will cost Jane $150. After enrolling in the class, Jane needs to consider how many hours she is willing to spend on learning a new language. For the first hour, Jane will get an incremental benefit of $85. Subsequently, she will only get incremental benefits of $74 from the second hour, $55 from the third, $30 from the fourth and $15 from the fifth. The cost to Jane, mainly due to fatigue and boredom, is $6 for the first hour, $12 for the second hour, $19 for the third hour, $29 for the fourth hour and $40 for the fifth hour. Using marginal analysis, Jane should spend how many hours learning?. The maximum surplus for Jane, from spending the number of hours learning which you found in part b, is $. Answer to the nearest whole number (with no decimal places).
Answer the given question with a proper explanation and step-by-step solution. Which of the following choices correctly illustrates how changes in opportunity costs affect supply? A) A farmer produces corn and wheat. The price of wheat rises, so he shifts his resources toward wheat and the supply of wheat rises. B) A fisherman fishes for lobsters and oysters. The price of lobsters rises, so he decides to spend more of his time fishing for oysters because he can make the same amount of money with fewer lobsters. C) A textbook for economics becomes cheaper, so more students opt to buy that particular textbook. D) Milk and cereal are complementary goods, so when the price of cereal falls, the quantity supplied of milk rises.
According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, more than a quarter of the Medicare budget goes to paying for medical care incurred during the enrollees’ last year of life. What is the opportunity cost of those billions of dollars? Is it relatively low or high? What could be possible alternative uses of that money? List at least a few alternative options and discuss the associated tradeoffs.
d) Another classmate cares more about good grades: She gets 50 units of happiness for a B and 80 units of happiness for an A. If this classmate were your partner (but your preferences remained the same), how would your answers to parts (a) and (b) change? Which of the two classmates would you prefer as a partner? Would she also want you as a partner?
sunk costs and decision making
A market economy seems to be able to satisfy customers who have different tastes in cars. Whether you want a big car, small car, red car or blue car, as long as you are willing to pay for it, you can find the car you desire. But with protective services (police), the market doesn’t seem to work as well. If you want lots of police attention, or little police protection, whether you want them to carry guns or not, whether you want them to prevent drug sales or not, none of us seem to be able to get the exact protection services that we are willing to pay for. Using economic reasoning, can you explain why the market can provide for many different tastes in cars, but not for many different tastes in protective services
Your total benefits from spending time with your spouse are shown in the following table. Hours per Day 0 Total Benefit 0 20 38 54 68 80 90 98 104 Alternatively, you have the option of working as many hours as you want, earning $11 per hour. Assume this is the next best use of your time. Use the marginal principle to find your optimal number f hours to spend with your spouse per day. The optimal amount of time for you spend with your spouse is hours per day. (Enter your response as an integer.)
Bleecker Street runs from A to B, as shown in the diagram. The lone convenience store currently in operation along this street is at A. An entrepreneur who wants to open another store in the neighborhood is weighing a choice between the only two available locations, C and D. If customers, who are uniformly distributed along Bleecker Street, always shop at the store nearest to where they live, which of the locations C or D would be optimal from the perspective of customers and why? A C D B O Location D because that would minimize the average travel time for customers. O Location D because that would mean each store would get an equal share of the market. O Location C because that would give the new entrepreneur higher profits. O Locations C and D would be equally attractive because consumers have no reason to care about the relative profitability of different entrepreneurs.