3. Two large countries are "players" in a game in which they each choose the tariff that maximizes welfare within their own country given what tariff the other country is charging. a. The tariff charged by each country is a decreasing function of the tariff the other country is charging. Why? b. Is the same thing true for a small country? That is, will a small country's optimal tariff depend upon the tariffs other countries charge? Why or why not?

3. Two large countries are "players" in a game in which they each choose the tariff that maximizes welfare within their own country given what tariff the other country is charging. a. The tariff charged by each country is a decreasing function of the tariff the other country is charging. Why? b. Is the same thing true for a small country? That is, will a small country's optimal tariff depend upon the tariffs other countries charge? Why or why not?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

1. Given below are two groups' (consumers, c, and a special interest group, i) true demands concerning a tariff on snack foods. Demand against (consumers): wtp($) = 80 + 2t Demand for (special interest): wtp($) = 50 - t Where t is the tariff rate. a. Graph the demand curves and explain how much tariff there will be if there were no free riding and all preferences were fully revealed. b. Now assume that "free riding" plagues the consumer group so that their revealed willingness to pay is given by: wtp($) = 30 + t. What are some causes of the "free riding"? Why is this not likely to happen to the producer group? c. Now what will be the equilibrium tariff rate? Graph this scenario in the same graph. d. Relate the outcome to a partial equilibrium tariff graph.
Consider the following model of trade between Home and Foreign. Assume throughout that those two countries are the only two countries in the world, at least for purposes of trade. There are two goods: Corn and Radio. Consumers always spend one-third of their income on Corn and the remainder on Radios. The only factor of production is labour. Each home country worker can produce 2 units of Corn or 3 units of Radios per unit of time, while each foreign worker can produce 2 units of Corn or 4 units of Radios per unit of time. There are 30 workers in Home and 60 workers in Foreign. Find the autarky relative price of Radios in both countries (i.e., the price of Radio divided by the price of Corn).
The graphs below show domestic supply and demand curves for a good in two countries, with prices measured in the same currency. If these are the only two countries in the world and if they open to free international trade, O. Demanders of the good in Country A will benefit from trade. O. Suppliers of the good in Country A will benefit from trade. O. The welfare of Country A as a whole will fall. O. The quantity of the good demanded in Country B will become larger. O. The price of the good in both countries will be the one labeled PB.
Consider two countries, Home and Foreign. In the figure below, the import demand ("IDHome") curve depicts Home's demand for Foreign's flash drives, and the import supply curve ("ISForeign") depicts Foreign's supply of flash drives to Home. Assume Home is a "large" country that levies a tariff against Foreign imports of flash drives, thereby shifting the relevant supply curve from ISForeign to ISForeign +t. For the following questions, please refer to the figure below. P $30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 15-- 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2 4 ISForeign +t 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 22 24 26 28 ISForeign IDHome 30 Q With free trade, Home's consumer surplus equals $112.50 and Foreign's producer surplus equals $112.50. With a tariff of $ 12 per flash drive, Home's consumer surplus equals $72, Foreign's producer surplus equals $ 36, Home's tariff revenue equals $72, and Home's deadweight loss equals $45. Of the Home's tariff revenue, $36 comes from Foreign's producers, and the rest comes from Home's consumers.…
The U.S. is an importer of ethanol, and let’s assume they are a price-taker in the world market. Suppose that a technological advance in ethanol production in Brazil, the world’s largest exporter, drives down the world price of ethanol by $5. Draw a graph and explain how this change in world price affects consumer surplus, producer surplus, and total surplus in the U.S. market. Now suppose the U.S. government institutes an import tariff of $5 in response to the fall in the world price. On your graph label the revenue raised by the tariff and the deadweight loss created (if it exists). Who is likely to support this policy? Suppose that the fall in price is attributable not to a technological advance but to a subsidy from the Brazilian government to Brazilian ethanol producers. How would this affect your analysis?
Our textbook suggests that individuals subscribing to a mercantilist or neo-mercantilist view of international trade consider trade as a zero-sum game. What do you believe are the implications of this in the context of international trade? Support your answer.
Suppose there are two states that do not trade: Iowa and Nebraska. Each state produces the same two goods: corn and wheat. For Iowa the opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of wheat is 3 bushels of corn. For Nebraska the opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of corn is 3 bushels of wheat. At present, Iowa produces 20 million bushels of wheat and 120 million bushels of corn, while Nebraska produces 20 million bushels of corn and 120 million bushels of wheat. a. If each state specialized in their respective comparative advantage: Iowa would produce million bushels of corn and million bushels of wheat. Nebraska would produce million bushels of wheat and million bushels of corn. Now assume Nebraska trades 120 million bushels of wheat for 120 million bushels of corn. With specialization and this trade, Nebraska will end up with million bushels of corn and million bushels of wheat, while Iowa will end up with million bushels of corn and million bushels of wheat. b.…
Which of the following best explains the concept of "Comparative Advantage" in international trade? a) A country should produce goods in which it has an absolute advantage and trade for those where it does not. b) A country should only export goods and import nothing to maintain a positive trade balance. c) A country should specialize in the production of goods for which it has the lowest opportunity cost compared to other countries. d) A country should diversify its production across various sectors to avoid dependence on a single export commodity.
Part c please
Given the information as follows: Consider the following model of trade between Vietnam and France. Assume throughout that those two countries are the only two countries in the world, at least for purposes of trade. There are two goods: Rice and Beef. Consumers always spend 1/4 of their income on rice and the remainder on beef. The only factor of production is labor. Each Vietnamese worker can produce 2 unit of Rice or 1 unit of beef per unit of time, while each French worker can produce 1 units of rice or 3 units of beef per unit of time. There are 100 million workers in Vietnam and 70 million in France. a. Determine the product brings higher wealth to each country. b. Determine the pattern of trade for both countries using Ricardian model. Draw the world relative supply curve. c. What is the benefit of each country when joining international trade following Ricardian model? Draw the graph to clarify your idea.
The U.S. and Canada both produce aircraft engines and tons of chemicals, which are sold for the same price in both countries. Suppose that with one unit of labor and one unit of capital, the U.S. can produce either 20 engines or 38 tons of chemicals and Canada can produce either 15 engines or 35 tons of chemicals. Which country has an absolute advantage producing chemicals?
Tricky question. Consider the diagram below, depicting the United States Market for Airplanes (hundreds of jets on the horizontal axis, and millions of dollars on the vertical axis). Suppose around the world, a 2 (million dollar) tariff is placed on United States Airplanes. What will exports of planes now be (round to one significant digit). Tricky question. Consider the diagram below, depicting the United States Market for Airplanes (hundreds of jets on the horizontal axis, and millions of dollars on the vertical axis). Suppose around the world, a 2 (million dollar) tariff is placed on United States Airplanes. Given exports, about how much will United States producers of airplanes wind up paying in tariffs?