3
1. Describe the bidding process by which the electricity generation sector provides electricity to pooling and balancing authorities. Additionally, show this process by building an electricity supply curve.
a. What antitrust and regulation concerns are present at the wholesale stage of the electricity market?
b. Describe a market design that reduces market manipulation in wholesale electricity markets. Show that the Nash equilibrium under this market design will result in generators bidding their true marginal cost of production.
c. Describe a vertically integrated industry as it pertains to the electricity sector.
d. Describe non-linear (two part) pricing as it pertains to retail electricity sales. What is the
purpose of this pricing system?
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
- 7arrow_forwardExplain all option compulsary......you will not explain all option then I will give you down upvote...arrow_forward11. In a Bertrand duopoly with homogenous goods and symmetric and identical constant marginal cost functions the Nash equilibrium has:. a. A price that is equal to marginal cost. b. Profits that are positive. c. The characteristic of strictly upward sloping best response functions. d. None of the above is a correct answer. 12. In a Bertrand duopoly with homogenous goods and uncertain marginal costs the symmetric Bayesian Nash equilibrium has:. a. All type of firms setting a price equal to marginal cost. b. Expected profits that are strictly positive. c. That the more firms in the industry lead to lower output levels in the industry. d. None of the above is a correct answer. 13. Suppose the markup or Lerner index at a symmetric Cournot-Nash equilibrium with n firms is L (n) = e where a is a demand parameter, c is the identical and symmetric marginal cost for all firms, a > c. This implies that: a. As n increases towards infinity the industry behaves as in perfect competition, ceteris…arrow_forward
- 3. We consider the following situation between 2 firms. Firm A (the "acquirer") would like to take over firm T (the "target"). It does not know firm I's value; it believes that this value, when firm T is controlled by its own management, is at least $0 and at most $100, and assigns equal probability to each of the dollar values in this range (we assume that the value is distributed uniformly on this interval). Firm T will be worth 50% more under firm A's management than it is under its own management. Suppose that firm A bids p to take over firm 7; and firm T is worth x (under its own management). Then if T accepts A's offer, A's payoff is 2x-p and T's payoff is p; if T rejects A's offer, A's payoff is 0 and T's payoff is x. (a) Formalize this situation as a Bayesian Game (b) Find the Bayesian Nash Equilibria of this game.arrow_forward3. Firm A and Firm B are two firms in an industry. Firm A and Firm B are planning to merge. (a) Firm A and Firm B are Bertrand duopolists with identical and constant marginal costs. Post-merger marginal cost is lower than pre-merger. Use a figure that includes a downward-sloping linear market demand to show how the merger of Firm A and Firm B will lead to anticompetitive losses as well as cost-savings. (b) Firm A and Firm B are Cournot duopolists with identical marginal costs. Post- merger marginal cost is the same as pre-merger. Use a figure that includes a downward-sloping linear market demand to show how the merger of Firm A and Firm B will lead to anticompetitive losses. (c) Firm A and Firm B are Stackelberg competitors with identical marginal costs. Post-merger marginal cost is the same as pre-merger. Firm A is the Stackelberg leader. Use a figure that includes a downward-sloping linear market demand to show how the merger of Firm A and Firm B will lead to anticompetitive losses.…arrow_forward8)Consider a market in which 5 companies operate, whose marginal and average costs are equal to c. The demand function is given by P(Q)= 1-Q, where P is the price and Q indicates the total quantity. Assume that companies compete with Cournot in choosing production levels. Assume that the game is repeated an infinite number of periods, that companies adopt trigger strategies and that the punishment is represented by Nash Reversion. 1)What is the value of the discount factor that allows companies to sustain tacit collusion in a balanced situation? 2) Assume now that companies are able to discover the defection of a rival company with K periods of delay. What do you think the effect on the sustainability of collusion can be? 3) Do you think that in this market collusion would be more easily sustainable if the companies compete with Bertrand? 4) If in a price-competitive market (Bertrand) N symmetrical companies operate, what would be the critical value of the discount factor that would…arrow_forward
- 1. Smart and Ferrari are both car firms. How do you think these firms differ in the way they go about conducting their business or are they actually very similar in lots of ways? 2. How might the pricing policies of Smart and Ferrari differ? 3. What sort of market structure do Smart and Ferrari operate in? How might these market structures affect the behaviour of the respective firms? 4. Explain the relevance of average, marginal and total costs to firms such as Ferrari and Smart. 5. Which do you think is more likely to benefit from economies of scale - Ferrari or Smart? Explain.arrow_forward1. The table below shows the percentage of sales held by the four largest firms in an industry. Company A B C D Market share (percent of sales) 12 10 5 3 a) Calculate this industry's four-firm concentration ratio. b) Is this industry competitive? why? c) What market type does it most likely represent?arrow_forwardA. Does either firm have a dominant strategy? B.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education