14. Fred buys a nice-looking vehicle at an auto auction and later discovers, through problems with the car's electrical system, that the vehicle had been totaled. Which of the following disclaimers would have tipped Fred off to the true nature of the vehicle? " buyer beware . " washed title" salvage only Od. " uncertain title" and known to participate in street

14. Fred buys a nice-looking vehicle at an auto auction and later discovers, through problems with the car's electrical system, that the vehicle had been totaled. Which of the following disclaimers would have tipped Fred off to the true nature of the vehicle? " buyer beware . " washed title" salvage only Od. " uncertain title" and known to participate in street

Principles Of Marketing

17th Edition

ISBN:9780134492513

Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Publisher:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)

Chapter1: Marketing: Creating Customer Value And Engagement

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The insured is covered under O.A.P. 1 Owner’s Policy including Direct Compensation-Property Damage and is involved in an accident in Ontario with an automobile, for which he/she is not at fault. His/her car is severely damaged and personal belongings in the car are destroyed. Which one (1) of the following statements is correct? O A) Damage to the insured's car and reimbursement for a rental vehicle are covered by the third party’s policy. O B) Damage to the insured’s car, replacement of destroyed personal belongings and reimbursement for a rental vehicle are covered by the insured’s policy, less the policy deductible. O C) Damage to the insured’s car, replacement of destroyed personal belongings and reimbursement for a rental vehicle are covered by the third party's policy. O D) Only damage to the insured’s car and reimbursement for a rental vehicle are covered by the insured's policy.
1. Happy Farms, Inc. ordered 1,000 gallons of a specialty pesticide, â€œBerry Good,â€ for its berry crop. The total price of the order was $15,000. Happy Farms paid $5,000 up front and promised to pay the balance upon delivery. JA changed the order to a newer product â€œVery Berry Goodâ€ without notice to or consents from Happy Farms. Upon delivery, the head farmer at Happy Farms, Allison Kagan, noted that the product was not the same as she ordered. Later that afternoon, Kagan notified JA that the pesticide was not what she had ordered and refused to pay the balance on the shipment. Happy Farms held the boxes of pesticide, but, to date, JA has not retrieved them. What are JAâ€™s legal options in this situation? 2. Martin Rupe worked as the manager of one of JAâ€™s retail outlets. A customer came in and offered to buy all remaining â€œBerry Goodâ€ pesticide for…
A 141. Subject:- finance
Reed, a manager for XYZ Products, issued company checks to pay his personal debts. So that no one in the company would know what he was doing, he disguised the name of the payees. For example, to pay his American Credit Card bill, he issued the XYZ check to “American.” XYZ Products sued the recipients of the checks, such as American Credit Card, demanding that the funds be returned. The trial court ruled against XYZ Products concluding that the Defendant-Payee, American Credit Card, was a holder in due course and thus took the checks free of any claims or defenses. Was the trial court correct in ruling that American Credit Card is a holder in due course? Why? What law is applicable? Can Reed be held criminally liable for his actions? Why or why not? Can Reed be civilly liable for his actions? To whom might Reed be liable and for what? 4. What is the business lesson to be learned from this case? Is this a fair result based on public policy constructs applicable to property…
Richard wants to sell his house, as is (meaning, "no warranties"). for $555,000. His neighbor, Chico. expresses interest in buying the house but wants time to think it over. Chico asks Richard to keep the offer open for five days. Richard gives Chico a written document, without a signature, that states, "Richard will not revoke the offer for five days." Three days later, Richard revokes the offer. Chico argues the offer was not revocable for another two days. Was the offer revocable? Yes, because there was not a valid option. No, because there was a valid option. Yes, because Chico did not sign the offer. O No. because there was a valid firm written offer. O Yes, because an offeror can always revoke.
Case: Brandt v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center Facts: Brenda Brandt was admitted to Bush Lincoln Health Center for treatment of urinary incontinence. She had a surgical procedure in which a sling was implanted. The manufacturer, Boston Scientific, recalled the item. Brenda had to have the sling surgically removed. She sued the manufacturer and the designer. In this case, Brandt’s bill from the Health Center reflects that of the $11,174.50 total charge for her surgery. $1,659.50, or 14.9%, was for the sling and its surgical kit. What provision of the UCC did the plaintiff sue under? What was the reasoning and decision of the court hearing the case
A long-time patient of Dr. Jones was admitted to the ICU. She was unable to respond and was having difficulty breathing. She required respirator support. Her son, her HCP, was called and came to the hospital. In discussion with the physician, the physician stated that he is aware of the patient’s wishes and suggests removing her from the respirator. The son said that he wants to keep his mother on the respirator. The physician insisted that he spoke with his mother at length and he knows that the patient does not want to be on a respirator. The son calls the Risk Manager to complain. You are the risk manager, what should be done?
The bulk carrier Evita was sailing westwards on the Norwegian Western coast on a voyage from Trondheim to Hamburg. 1. May 11.00 AM 2021, when passing Stavanger, she hit a reef and water started to ingress into a cargo tank. Furthermore, bunkers (fuel) started leaking from one of the fuel tanks.Evita had P & I Insurance and Hull insurance with Gard and Loss of Hire Insurance (LoH) with Norwegian Hull Club (NHC). The Hull insurance and the LoH insurances were based on the plan on the following terms:- Hull: Insurable value: USD 30 million, Sum of insurance: USD 30 million, Deductible: USD USD 30.000- LoH: Number of deductible days: 10. Number of days covered per causality: 80. Total number of days covered for the insurance period: 90.The master notified the Owners, Gard and NHC and assistance from a local towage and salvage firm was retained to assist. Furthermore, the pollution authorities were notified as the wind was strong and the bunkers oil leakage was spreading over a wide…
alculator Under a Commercial General Liability policy, which of the following actions is an obligation of the insures? O A To inspect the insured premises for safety To renew the policy period from the date of loss To pay claims only when there has been a judgment against the insured To pay a claim for which the insured has been found legally responsible OB. O. C. OD.
A co-worker of Illinois licensee Mona shared a client’s confidential information with her and asked Mona not to tell anyone. Instead of keeping it to herself, Mona gave the information to another licensee. Which statutory duty has been breached? Adhere to the brokerage agreement’s terms Employ reasonable skill and care in performing brokerage services for the client Keep all confidential information provided by the client confidential Serve the client’s best interests
Under a Commercial General Liability policy, which of the following action on Goligation of the insurer OA to inspect the insured premises for safety OB. To renew the policy period from the date of los To pay claims only when there has been a judgment against the insured To pay a calm for which the insured has been found legally responsible OD.
need help asap