preview

Wtc Victim What's A Life Worth Analysis

Decent Essays

When a loved one dies, it feels like the end of your world. No apology could fix it. However, I believe that even the most sincere acts of sympathy and grief towards the victim(s) would show more respect than trying to put a price value on those who suffered. Amanda Ripley, author of WTC Victims: What’s A Life Worth?, writes about what the government planned to do to compensate for family losses. According to the article, Kenneth Feinberg, who is responsible for dispersing money to the ones that were increasingly affected by the attacks, without shame went into detail of how one can figure out how much the government is willing to pay. In the end, most people’s total compensation were either near or at zero. Many family members were appalled and a woman by the name of Maureen Halvorson even said,“I just can't accept the fact that the Federal Government is saying my husband and my brother are worth nothing.” It would have been more gratifying to those experiencing mass grief if the government simply sent out messages of deep condolence rather than try to put a zero next to the victim’s name. …show more content…

The flaws come from within the organization.“ Our system of justice has always been based upon this idea — that compensation for death should be directly related to the financial circumstances of each victim”(Feinberg). After having to face those who lost everything they cared for due to the 9/11 attacks, Feinberg changed his views. He too realized that it would be a lot more rewarding for the congress to provide the exact amount of profit for each victim instead of telling one they are more valuable than the other. What the law requires is injustice and Feinberg took it upon himself to provide equal compensation for any future consequences faced by

Get Access