Why We Should Not Put Restrictions On Children's Screen Time

One reason why a limit for screen time is not a good idea, is because for educational reasons. Children can develop problem-solving and critical thinking skills by playing computer games designed to develop these skills. Also, joining online clubs can help children practice using social media safely. This is for internet safety reasons as well

Screen time has numerous negative effects for children which can be putting them at a disadvantage later on in life. Parents are starting to rely on screens as a cheap and convenient

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends children under the age of two years have no screen time, with the exception of video chatting. Children younger than two benefit from a hands-on learning approach, therefore, introducing them to a digital device takes away time they need to be socially interactive to develop their cognitive, language, motor, and social-emotional skills. By the age of two, and through the preschool aged years it is recommended that children have no more than 1 ½ hours of screen time per week, and that screen time should be monitored to ensure it is educational as well as age appropriate. There are even television channels and computer applications that are dedicated to creating educational, engaging, and enjoyable content for such young viewers, however, it should be noted that

Technology has been part of our daily live more frequently than before. Screen time has been more popularly used on kids and adolescents. On a daily bases many kids seem to spend more time inside on their tablets, instead of having to spend time with other kids. This is a problem that is becoming more popular over the years,on whether kids need to spend that much time on technology or not. Parents either seem to have strict technology usage, or they either don’t. There has always been a huge controversy with experts, who either think that screen time is beneficial or could cause problems later on in life. There are many views towards this topic, from hurting kids brains, to helping them during school, and socially.

According to some research this is another reason to reduce screen time. Joan Ganz Cooney Center, a non-profit research and production institute, suggested that little ones spend less than half the time in front of screens watching educational material between the ages of 2 and 10. We can only assume that statistic will deplete in time. Family income cannot be helped but is also a determining factor. According to the center lower income families had their children doing better with watching educational screen activities then higher income families. I take that as less means leads to more interaction and attention to the better educational route and more leading to lack

For example, Bronson and Merryman revealed that children are too distracted with technology like television and cellular phones. Since children were allowed to have personal cellular phones, the use of cell phones has been a distraction of their daily sleep and parents are not fully monitoring this behavior. For example, children know they need sleep, but they refuse to do so because they want to know what is happening on their social media apps like Facebook and Instagram. Television is also a sleep distraction due to most televisions being placed in the children’s bedrooms. Children claim that they are staying up by choice due to not being able to complete homework or study for exam due to after school activities, but children also reveal how much time they spend on their cell phones that contain many distractions to prevent them from focusing on their academic responsibilities. Parents should strongly monitor their children’s technology use. For example, the parents must lecture their children about time management and if the child continues to become distracted with technology, they can ban them from the child in order for him/her to complete homework on time and have longer hours of

Teens’ screen time should be limited, not by a strict rule enforced by their parents, but by being taught guidelines as to how long and when are the appropriate times to use the devices. In his article, Don’t Limit Your Teen’s Screen Time, Chris Bergman argues that if technology is unrestricted, social events and time without supervision aren’t “an opportunity for… kids to binge on tech because they couldn't otherwise” (1). What Bergman is saying is the more you can not have something, the more you will want it, so by not enforcing strict rules about technology, parents allow their children to take social opportunities as a time to interact with others, rather than a time to sneak in more screen time. Although keeping a lenient rule over one’s

Upon hearing the first argument that children should not be allowed so much screen time, I could not help but agree; however the second agrument that there is no such thing as too much screen time does in fact make excellent points. I do however agree more with the first agrument than the second for several reasons, including personal experience, and personal opinions. In this essay I will attempt to find a common ground between the two agruments in an effort to bring peace to this long standing debate.

Do you think kids should be limited on screen time? Well, kids invest almost four hours daily watching TV and playing video games. Kids could be getting exercise for four more hours. Another reason is kids should get fresh air. In fact fresh air is better for you than the air you breathe indoors. Also, TV and video games are a waste of time. Many kids don't get their homework done for class, but they have time to play video games and waste their time. Two to five year olds should have no more than one hour of electronic time daily. Anymore than that can damage their eyes at a young age. Kids in the range of five to eighteen shouldn’t be on electronics for more than two hours daily. Children in this age range should socialize and actually talk

First of all, screen time gives kids role models. Some news stories, TV shows, and video games give kids role models, which can benefit them since it will encourage them to engage in good behavior. In addition, the article "Media Benefits for Children and Teenagers" stated "For example, by observing good role models in the media." Although some people argue that there are too many negative role models in the media, the children should be responsible enough to know right from wrong. As you can see, this is one reason why screen time shouldn't be limited for teens.

We have all been there- the fourth hour of non-stop “screen time,”. Most the washed away hours consists of loosing yourself in another world, or accomplishing a specific operation. But just like fast food, or alcohol, why should “screen time” be limited? After absorbing multiple resources the people have come to the conclusion, “screen time” should not be capped, understanding the ideas of lesson learning, beneficial apps, and social networks, and the fact that this is the twenty first century, should all aid you to the reasons of my beliefs.

As each day goes by, the world continues to invent new ways to use and enjoy technology. Humans live in a society where there’s a television in every restaurant, a computer in every classroom, and smartphone in every person’s hand. This new rise of technology affects all types of people, especially young children. Teachers and educators all around the world embrace technology because they believe that children gain academic benefits from it, leading to a smarter and more educated world. While having access to screen time as a young child can help them sharpen their brain skills, many parents know that the harms outweighs the benefits. They know that an extended amount of screen time leads to physical and psychological damage in their children, all while impairing their social skill and actually decreasing academic performance.

Some parents might argue, however, that kids do not necessarily waste their time with technology and actually utilize it for educational purposes such as “researching a school project, creating music or art, or interacting with friends via social media.”(Elana). Parents might believe that this is reason acceptable enough to let them control it as much as they need to. They are partially

Parents could also prevent children from using all of their free time playing with electronic devices by creating less time for individual

A major solution to improve face-to-face communication is having a set schedule for screen time. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) partnered with “healthchildren.org” has created a Family Media Plan. The plan allows for children of all ages to be accounted for when handling technology, and in a hypothetical situation, one can create a family with different aged children: the first child being 18-24 months, the second child being 2-5 years, and the third child being 6-12 years. There are eight categories the AAP recommends to follow in order for the child to be healthy without being technologically behind. The first category they advocate is “Screen Free Zones.” At all ages there should be no devices on the table or in the child’s bedroom. If the child makes habit of it in the bedroom, they think it is okay to sleep with it. The second category is “Screen Free Times.” An hour before bed all children should put away their technology in order to have a well rested night (Corinn ). If they were to go to bed right after screen time, it could damper their sleep due to their brains still functioning at a high level. The dinner table and car are also places where technology should not be present. The one exception is long car rides. In the age group 6-12, there should be no technology when doing homework, at school, or walking on the sidewalk. The next section is “Device Curfews.” This indicates where and when the device will