Honour is the force the drives the characters in Hamlet. Whether it be blind emotion and the seeking of vengeance or moral contemplation that must result in cleansing damnation. To honour means to avenge and to avenge means to kill. Can seeking vengence be the right thing to do, or does an eye for an eye just make the whole world blind? This is a question that puzzles us to this day and it is one of the reasons this play has been performed consistently since it's debut. Although in Hamlet's time the consensus was that honour always came first. Hamlet himself however, was a thinking renaissance man. The contemplation and weighing of morals Hamlet undergoes Juxtaposes the common ideology of his time.
In characters such as Claudius, Laertes, Fortinbras and Polonius their thoughts are completely consumed by the idea of honour. For Claudius and Polonius all that is important to them is that they
…show more content…
However, Hamlet's honour comes from more of a moral dimension. Hamlet needs to do the right thing. He cannot kill claudius unless he knows he's guilty. This is the purpose behind Hamlet's play "mousetrap" as he calls it. In addition, his humility prevents him from thinking he can make God's decisions between the life and death of a man. Hamlet is constantly perplexed and rightfully so. The decisions Hamlet is faced with should in no way be taken lightly. This constant reasoning that Hamlet undergoes draws admiration from me. I see putting morality before emotion as a very noble gesture. However, Hamlet thinks otherwise. He sees himself as a coward who can't put his thoughts into action. This disposition gives a wonderful perspective on how human Hamlet really is. He is not perfect by any means. For instance, he kills Polonius in an act of pure impulse and he feels so betrayed and heartbroken by ophelia that he let's his raw emotions speak and degrades her in public. But it's Hamlet's attempts to be righteous that set him
Hamlet also delays killing the King because he is unsure of the morality of carrying out such a task. This factor is important as Hamlet is a very idealistic and moralistic person. Revenge was prohibited by ecclesiastical law, but the duty of personal honour' prevalent in Elizabethan times often won through. In the play, Hamlet debates
In William Shakespeare’s tragic drama Hamlet, the hero, Hamlet, appears to be guilty of hubris, an overstepping of the bounds of both his and humanity’s destinies, which ultimately leads to his downfall. Reading the play with a consideration as to how Hamlet’s hubris manifests itself sheds light on why he performs certain actions, and simultaneously enlightens the reader to the dangers of attempting to overstep the confines of humanity. In this essay, I will prove that Hamlet has extreme pride, and is therefore guilty of hubris; in accordance with Harold Skulsky’s assertion in his article, ““I Know My Course”: Hamlet’s Confidence,” Hamlet is hubristic because while he believes that his own soul is impenetrable based on his external
Throughout the play, Hamlet is dealing with conflict within himself. When Hamlet finds that he must take revenge on Claudius, he is unsure whether there is any point in having to kill, to take another human life, and whether he would be able to handle this. Hamlet fights inside himself. Is this right? Is this his duty? He considers suicide again, "To be or not to be, that is the question." Hamlet shows his philosophical nature, and talks himself out of the idea of suicide, fearing the unknown beyond. He is thoughtful and intelligent and not first a man of action.
His narcissism leads him to impose two standards: one for himself and one for society. However, he believes that his standards are higher and that he believes that society should meet his standards. In addition, he looks down on the faults of friends and family rather than recognizing he has them himself. His morals are just as lacking as everyone around him. When he speaks to Ophelia in (III.v.105-123), he says, “That if you be honest and fair, your honesty should admit no discourse to your beauty. Ay, truly, for the power of beauty will sooner transform honesty from what it is to a bawd than the force of honesty can translate beauty into his likeness. This was sometime a paradox, but now the time gives it proof. I did love you once.You should not have believed me, for virtue cannot so inoculate our old stock but we shall relish of it. I loved you not. Get thee to a nunnery.” Hamlet criticizes her of lying and being dishonest when in reality he’s the one being dishonest about his sanity; he is also telling her that he never loved her and telling her to become a nun where she will cause less damage to society. His actions towards the people he so-called ‘loves’ leads him to become morally unfit. His self-regard for himself and his ties to his madness both point him towards a down spiral of moral ambiguity. His rashness and quick to judge reflects on how he chooses the wrong
It is quite obvious that everyone is usually obedient towards their family, even if it is unwanted at times. Well the same goes for Hamlet. In the court scene, Hamlet speaks with the king and queen, with Claudius trying to act more like a new father figure to Hamlet. However, Hamlet does not obey his orders, but pretends to for the sake of others. For instance, Hamlet only listens to his mother’s request to remain in Denmark. As an example, “Let not thy mother lose her prayers, Hamlet. I pray thee stay with us, go not to Wittenberg”. Hamlet responds by saying “I shall in all my best obey you, madam (1.2.118-120).” This shows Hamlet’s respect for his mother and his obedience towards her even with the recent events that have transpired. George Rylands concurs, “Claudius...with the Queen’s aid he persuades him not to return to the University of Wittenberg” (Rylands 36).
He was gifted with a great mind which he uses extensively. Hamlet believes that things should be inherently good, and that people's motives should be fair. Consequently, he has a great deal of difficulty in coming to terms with
Throughout history, class distributions have constantly been a serious issue. Many compositions today display social disparity; however, to recognize it, one needs to look through the proper lens. Literary critical lenses help to understand a work from a different angle which leads to a further interpretation of the composition. There are many lenses and aspects in literature, and one of them is the Marxist Theory. Also known as the Conflict Theory, this idea asserts that class struggle is a powerful divider in society. Although it is a social idea, this concept also relates to literature. In his play Hamlet, William Shakespeare demonstrates class struggles. Looking at this composition through the lens of the Marxist Theory, one uncovers that the dominant ones suppress and exploits the others seeking to display their superiority.
Responsibility is a key component in establishing a person’s character and a vital part of human existence. Of the three definitions the Oxford Dictionary provides, the one of most relevance is; the opportunity or ability to act independently and take decisions without authorization. This definition is particularly important because the decisions a person makes without the influence of others essentially denotes a person’s character and displays who they truly are. Throughout life, numerous opportunities are brought about which require a person to take responsibility and make the appropriate choices. Students are expected to be responsible throughout their academic careers by upholding the standards established by the institution they are
Hamlet is a suspenseful play that introduces the topic of tragedy. Throughout the play, Hamlet displays anger, uncertainty, and obsession with death. Although Hamlet is unaware of it, these emotions cause the mishaps that occur throughout the play. These emotions combined with his unawareness are the leading basis for the tragic hero’s flaws. These flaws lead Hamlet not to be a bad man, but a regular form of imperfection that comes along with being human.
An individual needs to be mindful of their actions and how their action affects other individuals. Hamlet wants to kill Claudius for revenge and this ambition leads him to accidently killing Polonius instead of Hamlet, “How now, a rat? Dead for a ducat, dead!”
Throughout Hamlet, Shakespeare shows the inherent complications and unintended conflict between rank and social class by making the members of the lower class experience hardships and conflict at the hands of the royal family and upper class. The idea of social class distinction is very prevalent in Hamlet and how each character interacts with every other character. Despite the fact that Shakespeare wrote Hamlet centuries before the Industrial Revolution and the rise a large divide between the one percent and the bourgeoisie, it was still written during a time of class struggle. During the time of Shakespeare, the feudal system of land-ownership was in full effect, and the people struggled for freedom from their monarcho-fascist oppressors.
Hamlet experiences a tremendous amount of internal conflict throughout the play. He is constantly debating whether or not he should face his troubles. This sense of uncertainty comes from a lack of self confidence,
There are many different ways to put karma into words. People say “What goes around comes around” and “You get what you give.” There are many different beliefs, some believe that you get back sevenfold, others believe that you get the equal. Whatever the case, you still want to be as good as you can. In Hamlet karma is a common factor throughout the play. Some examples are when Polonius gets killed when he is spying on what is supposed to be a private meeting between Hamlet and his mother. Laertes gets killed by his own poisoned weapon. Hamlet is also a victim to karma as well as many other characters in this play.
Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a tragic play about murder, betrayal, revenge, madness, and moral corruption. It touches upon philosophical ideas such as existentialism and relativism. Prince Hamlet frequently questions the meaning of life and the degrading of morals as he agonizes over his father’s murder, his mother’s incestuous infidelity, and what he should or shouldn’t do about it. At first, he is just depressed; still mourning the loss of his father as his mother marries his uncle. After he learns about the treachery of his uncle and the adultery of his mother, his already negative countenance declines further. He struggles with the task of killing Claudius, feeling burdened about having been asked to find a solution to a situation that was
Hamlet faces challenges throughout the play that try his inner strengths and test his ability to handle the situation. He is torn between wanting to seek justice, and avenge his father’s death. Hamlet is also caught up in an intricate web of lies and deceit, he is considered mad by most characters when in all actuality it is just playing off of the actions of others to benefit himself. He puts on different acts trying to hide the truth, which makes him seem sincerely mad to the people around him. The truth of the matter is that Hamlet can’t decide whether or not his convictions are accurate. This dilemma ultimately leads to not only the deaths of the main characters, but the downfall of the kingdom.