David McCullough once said, “If everyone is special, then no one is. If everyone gets a trophy, trophies become meaningless.” Participation trophies were introduced to society in the early 1920s to reward kids not for ability but merely for participation in sports. Over time, participation trophies have been found to have positive and negative effects on children. Today, the world is in a debate over whether or not kids should receive these trophies. Children should not receive participation trophies in sports because it kills kids' sense of competition, children will not learn how to accept failure, and it can cause children to act narcissistically. The first reason children should not receive participation trophies is because it kills a kid's …show more content…
Losing is an opportunity that children can use to work harder to win next time.”(“The Participation Trophy Debate”). Gem Awards corroborates the idea that, if every kid feels as if they are the winner of receiving a trophy, they will not work as hard to improve themselves. This can also play into later in life when it comes to getting jobs and much more, if they never learned to work hard for their goals as a kid they could struggle to achieve their goals as adults. Therefore, receiving participation trophies can not only affect kids in the short run, but it can also affect them long term. Another reason children should not receive participation trophies is that they will not learn how to accept failure. As mentioned by the author of EuroKids, “When they get to college/work and struggle, they are more likely to give up than dig in. They are more likely to blame their professor/boss instead of looking inside themselves. Why do you need to be a member? Because they have always been told that they are special.”(“Exploring The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Participation Trophies”). With their quote, EuroKids shows that if kids do not learn to accept failure from a young age, they could face many hardships as …show more content…
It helps them to become confident and have increased self-esteem in the things they pursue.”(“The Participation Trophy Debate”). Although this may be true, over-rewarding kids for small victories can lead to narcissism later in life. Ashley Merryman, a New York Times author, agrees when she writes,” Kids with already high self-esteem see the trophies as vindication they really are as wonderful as they see themselves. In a longitudinal study, when parents regularly overpraised their children’s performances, their children were more likely to be narcissistic two years later.” (Merryman). In Merryman’s writing, she expresses the point that feeding into children's already high self-esteem makes it more likely for those children to grow up to be narcissistic and self-centered. In brief, children should not be receiving participation trophies because it can kill their sense of competition, they will not learn how to accept failure, and it can cause them to act narcissistically when they grow
Participation trophies give the message that everyone is entitled to an award. In the articles, “Participation Trophies Send a Dangerous Message” by Betty Berden and “Participation Trophies Send a Powerful Message” by Parker Abate, the authors give their opinions on whether children should receive participation trophies. Children should not receive participation trophies because they do not represent actual achievements, and when children receive participation trophies, it sends the message that only by showing up or doing what is expected, will they get rewarded. Children should not receive participation trophies because they are not for actual achievements. For instance, Berden describes how when growing up and receiving participation awards, they do not mean much because many others receive the same awards.
As children who have received participation awards begin to grow older, they are introduced to more and more situations in which not everyone is a winner. A person who has been a winner all their life will eventually lose, and it will affect them more seriously because they have not had experience dealing with failure at an early age. According to the article “Failure is an Option: Raising Children in a ‘Participation Trophy’ Society” in Scouting Magazine, Dr. Tim Elmore believes failure is like a coach, teaching kids to try their best. Elmore argues that participation trophies take away the positive effects of losing, and children grow up lacking motivation and become wary of testing their abilities due to fear of failure. This leads to children being more emotionally fragile than they should be, which may eventually result in serious matters such as depression and even suicide. Participation awards treat everyone like a winner, which means children do not learn how to cope with loss. Kids that don’t experience dealing with failure end up being afraid of it, and this constant fear contributes to psychological problems such as stress, anxiety, and depression. For example, if a child were to
- James Harrison. If participation trophies were gone, then when kids got trophies, they would actually be proud of it. They would know that they got a trophy for something they did, not just show up. Trophies should be handed out for 3rd place, 2nd place, and 1st place.
Reminisce about your childhood, sports and activities your parents put you in to spark your interest; remember the awards and medals received. These tokens of achievement are full of special memories and the joyful aspects of being a child. The passages, “Participation Trophies Send a Dangerous Message,” by Betty Berden and “Participation Trophies Send a Powerful Message,” by Parker Abate, weigh in on the pros and cons of children receiving trophies for different activities in sports and throughout school. Some people may argue that every child should not receive a reward if they were not one of the best during their activities; however, children should be rewarded for small accomplishments to encourage and uplift them during their childhood.
Participation trophies only hurt kids. These trophies have been given out in many sports for decades but they do not mean much to older children. Something as simple as golden painted plastic will not keep a child playing for long after their first years. Children must also be taught how to compete early on. These trophies create a lack of competition in youth athletes and should not be given to children above the age of ten to help teach them life skills and to protect them from struggling in their future lives when they will have to compete for jobs.
Is giving kids participation trophies beneficial to children, or motivation killers? Many people all around the U.S. have their opinions for both sides of the discussion. James Harrison, linebacker for the Pittsburgh Steelers, has weighed in on this topic. In many people’s eyes, his beliefs make a lot of sense, they understand where he’s coming from and what he is speaking about. Carol Dweck also made a statement to NPR about her belief’s on the topic. There are millions of important facts that need to be talked about with this epidemic: an estimated fifty-seven percent said “only winners” should receive a trophy for participation in kids sports, giving out participation trophies is tantamount to giving kids the wrong kind of praise, and this
In an age where everyone is expected to be recognized, there must be an understanding that the world does not progress by congratulating the “average.” I believe that giving participation trophies makes people stop competing; especially if the trophies are given at a very early age. For example, a team of small children have a terrible baseball season, but it’s okay! Because the coach gives out trophies to everyone. This in turn only teaches the child that no matter how bad life gets, they will always be rewarded. Participation trophies create future generations of entitled adults as seen by today’s generation. We need to reward kids that work hard for what they do for the sake of risk and reward. That is simply how progress is made in society. Yet I agree with one point made by the opposing side. I believe that participation should be recognized sometimes. Participation can teach kids that teamwork matters in every little aspect of society. Participation trophies should be eliminated but participation should still merely just be recognized with a pat on the back as said by Betty Berdan, a high school junior from Connecticut. Participation trophies overall hinder the growing and learning process of kids; whether it is through sports, or any other competitive involvement.
Claim: While others may say that giving participation trophies to kids is good, I disagree. Participation trophies may seem beneficial at first sight as they are encouraging to young athletes and those who participate. However, I feel they are sending the wrong message to young kids. The message is that they don't have to try in any activity and they will still succeed. This eats away at the importance of striving for great accomplishments.
Participation trophies started in the early 21st century in an attempt to boost kids’ self-confidence. This trend is believed to have started after the “self-esteem craze” in the late 1980’s into the early 1990’s. Schools started to gear their focus toward each child, making sure each and everyone knew how special they were. Movies, such as The Karate Kid and The Bad News Bears, started glorifying the “misfits” and making the popular kids and jocks appear as villains (Ross). It was once this generation of kids grew up to have children of their own that the “every kid deserves a trophy” phase began.
Once you reach age eight you understand the concept of the game and that their are winners and losers. By taking away participation trophies we can eliminate the culture of expectation that everyone gets a trophy for showing up and kids will understand that you are going to have to work hard to get a trophy that you truly deserve. If we do decide to stop giving out participation trophies children need to understand that “It’s okay to lose, but it’s not ok to not try your best” (Lula Bauer). Lessons in sports can still be taught without participation trophies. “Trophies aren’t all the issues.
Participation trophies can vary from sports to clubs to activities of any type. Many people believe these standard awards provide many benefits for children and their childhood growth. However, children today have become accustomed to receiving an item or prize regardless the outcome of their effort, which could potentially send an unhealthy message about achievement and diminish the value of the award.
Participation trophies are a highly debated topic among childrens sports. Many people beleive it is unessarcary, while others beleive it boosts self-esteem to non-confident young athletes. Participation Trophies should not be handed out because kids will learn that if the just give a little effort towards accomplishing something they will get rewarded.
Last year 7 year old Billy beat his opponent in a tennis match. Billy was so enlightened that he was going to get a trophy. Then, he looks to his opponent and saw that he was getting the same trophy as Billy! Billy felt very depressed after that because he worked so hard to win just to see the opponent getting a trophy for clearly not as much work. Participation trophies started in the 60’s to motivate inner city kids, but it spread like wildfire everywhere. Kids should not get trophies just for participating they need to work hard to get them this is ,because after time trophies can lose their value. It will also not encourage kids to improve with skills , and it is very expensive.
Participation trophies are a very bad thing. Participation trophies should not be given out to young kids that have no idea what they are. Little kids more than likely do not know what they are and some might think that they won even though they lost. With kids not knowing what they are makes them think that they did just as good as the kids that won. They need to know what they did wrong and what the can do to improve that and be like the kids that won. Some kids might grow up with everyone telling them that they did great and they have nothing to work on. They think they are better than those who won and even everyone in their life. Kids should grow up becoming better in things that they feel passionate about and not just giving up. Kids
Participation trophies are changing kids ideas of winning around the globe in many ways. First off, it gives children the wrong impression on working or putting an effort towards something. Trophies are something you should have to earn. Life doesn’t give you a participation medal, you have to earn it (Website #2). Kids just need to learn that