preview

Participation Trophies Should Be Allowed

Decent Essays

Participation trophies started in the early 21st century in an attempt to boost kids’ self-confidence. This trend is believed to have started after the “self-esteem craze” in the late 1980’s into the early 1990’s. Schools started to gear their focus toward each child, making sure each and everyone knew how special they were. Movies, such as The Karate Kid and The Bad News Bears, started glorifying the “misfits” and making the popular kids and jocks appear as villains (Ross). It was once this generation of kids grew up to have children of their own that the “every kid deserves a trophy” phase began. There are credible arguments on both sides of the debate on whether or not participation trophies should be awarded. One side argues participation trophies promote self-confidence and a sense of belonging. The other side states that participation trophies undermine the meaning of hard work. Although both sides contribute worthy arguments, there is a major difference between earning a trophy and being given a trophy. Trophies need to regain their purpose and become something that is won …show more content…

As professional athletes, they know all about hard work and what it takes to be successful. Many argue that participation trophies are a distraction. For example, Bryce Harper, an outfielder for the Washington Nationals is one of the best-known players in today’s baseball. He has won an abundance of awards and titles, 5-time All-Star and 2015 National League MVP topping of the list. In May, Harper made a comment to a group of kids saying there should be no participation trophies, and kids should strive for 1st place only (Wood). Some have misinterpreted this statement by thinking if you do not win 1st place, then nothing else matters. However, what Harper was implying is kids should always strive to be the best. If you are not trying to be the best at something, then what is the point of

Get Access