Immitation is a trait of humans starting at a young age and continuing up through adulthood. It is a natural response leading to a greater understanding of one’s surroundings and societal standing. Nonetheless, it is often a source of great debate due to the justification it provides for pursuing actions that stray from the ethical. Therefore, frequently literature that incorporates uncertain content is banned or marked as to prevent the allocation of such ideas to be imitated by children or unintentional readers. School systems have neglected to include in their curiculum books that advocate for violence, parents do not search out books with violent notions for their children to read, and our government has set standards and punishments to discourage violent actions in citizens. However, perhaps we have been looking to the wrong sources for such vehement encourages, perhaps a much more widespread and unassuming source exists. In John J. Collins book, Does the Bible Justify Violence?, he delves into the controversy over religious text that …show more content…
One distinction not mentioned is the reference to historical features allocated to the setting of the Bible’s stories. Coming with the passage of time arrives different societal norms; therefore, it is important to put historical context into play when examining the violence in the Bible. It is well known that earlier time periods were subjected to more extreme forms of violence as a part of everyday life and culture. Hence, the violence, specifically the ban, was not an uncommon feature or reality to the people represented by the Bible. Thus, one can question whether the violence set forth in the Bible should be ridiculed as severely due to its origin stemming from such a harsh time in human history. If John Collins had referenced this contention, his argument could have been made
Many people, especially parents of school children, would be inclined to believe impressionable human beings should not be exposed to the violence seen in
When it comes to the topic of violent media, some of us would readily agree it’s a controversial subject as to whether kids should or shouldn’t be exposed to it. This is because many children who view violent media react negatively rather than not being affected at all. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of what effects does it have on children. Whereas some are convinced that it is a healthy alternative for kids to express themselves, others maintain that it causes kids to become more aggressive and contributes to juvenile crimes.
The text reveals that Daddy Norton’s religious fanaticism dominates every aspect of his family’s lives. Nonetheless, his parenting methods are analogously guided by the same ideological standards. Bottoms et al. refers to the fact that the Bible actually encourages such violent, physically abusive parenting techniques as Daddy Norton’s in the verses: "He Religion and child abuse that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes" and "Withhold no correction from the child: for if
In Gerard Jones' essay “Violent Media is Good for Kids,” he argues a position not taken by many in today's culture. Jones advocates children should be exposed to violent media in order to overcome real life hardships. The problem with Jones' argument arise when he fails to develop his somewhat dated ideas and leaves his audience questioning how effective such exposure would be.
In fairy tales, children are pushed into ovens, have their hands chopped off, are forced to sleep in coal bins, and must contend with wolves who've eaten their grandmother. In myths, rape, incest, all manner of gruesome bloodshed, child abandonment, and total debauchery are standard fare. We see more of the same in Bible stories, accentuated with dire predictions of terrors and abominations in an end of the world apocalypse that is more horrifying than the human imagination can even grasp.
If a young child is exposed to violence in their early stages of growth it will have a lasting impression on them. "The younger the child, the more harmful the impact may be. Young children are at high risk due to their immature ability to understand," (Futures without Violence 1). However, according to The National Institute of Mental Health, the brain is less influenced by ideas, like violence and foul language, by the age of 15 because the ideas have already been shown to them through excessive exposure to these topics in television, video games, and current events. Children have been desensitized of the permanent aspect of death, but the older the child the more violence has been shown as something to be afraid of. High schoolers in advanced placement classes have already uncovered the violence in modern society. Therefore, the violence in In Cold Blood should not have a long lasting effect on these students if the issues are discussed in a secure
To Kill a Mockingbird, author Harper Lee uses unhypocritical, more experienced characters like Atticus to expose Jem and Scout to adult knowledge. Their adult influence is what brings about the empathetic growth and maturity of Jem and Scout.
Violence in mass media has been constantly discussed in the past twenty years as a reasoning for teenage violence against others, between video games such as “Doom” and “Call of Duty”, movies such as “Fight Club”, “Scream”, “American Psycho”, and “Natural Born Killers” and social media dehumanizing acts of violence. Many parents have labeled anything that is not family-friendly as a root cause of criminal behavior. Others also blame the amount of violence in media now as unhealthy to young people, solely because many don’t know the line of what is real and not real. “In Cold Blood”, by Truman Capote, details the gruesome murder of the Clutter family in rural Holcolb, Kansas in November of 1959 committed by two men; Dick Hickock and Perry Smith. In Capote’s novel, he describes the motives of the killers and their backstory in order to help humanize them. Some may say that because of both the violence and the humanization of the killers, the book should be banned. However, banning the book would be censoring something important for youth to learn from. This novel should be implemented in schools to let younger generations be aware of the real world, and to be aware that not everything is picture-perfect in the world.
From infancy onward, parents and teachers have drilled into the young generation that violence should be avoided at all costs. They have preached cooperation, tolerance, and “using one’s words” as tactics to combat difficult situations. Although those lessons are valid, Gerald Jones claims there is an alternative way. In his essay, “Violent Media is Good for Kids,” Jones argues that “creative violence- bonking cartoons, bloody videogames, toy guns-gives children a tool to master their rage” (Jones). In other words, media violence, used correctly, can serve as an alternative method for powering through adolescence. By reading and writing violent stories, children are able to express
The first essay I picked is “Computer Vision Syndrome Affects Millions” by Jane E. Brody. In this essay, Brody introduces a disease called “computer vision syndrome” that people who spend three or more hours a day in front of computer monitors may suffer. He states “Studies have indicated 70 percent to 90 percent of people who use computers extensively, whether for work or play, have one or more symptoms of computer vision syndrome. The effects of prolonged computer use are not just vision-related. Complaints include neurological symptoms like chronic headaches and musculoskeletal problems like neck and back pain”. Similar to Carr’s perspective, Brody believes advanced technology brings negative effects on people, but his essay focuses more
Before answering the question posed, first the etymology of the word ‘violence’ will be examined:
Many parents seek to have children’s literature which contains violence removed or banned from all access to young children. They complain that the subject matter of these books is too much for children to handle. The parents do this as they believe it to be a form of protection from the dangerous world we live in. they know all too well that what is expressed in the books is happening in reality.by reading these violent books it evokes a sense of fear or the need to harm oneself or others. Therefore stopping the chance of them reading these books is shielding them from the hurt and pain which it is associated with. Literature and media are the main reasons for violence in the
The literature also feels and backs her opinion on violence. Violence among our youth has spread widely throughout the nation. This can be linked to several problems in our society, but mainly one. The constant barrage of television and media violence causes deviant behavior in
There has been controversy over whether or not the United States’ elections are rigged; this theory came up again when Donald Trump claimed that John Podesta, a chairman on Hillary Clinton’s campaign, rigged the polls as a voter suppression technique on October 24, 2016 (Qiu). This isn’t the first time the elections authenticity has been questioned; when we think “rigged,” it is normally referring to accusations of direct voter fraud or in which the results were procedurally contested, extensively protested, or recognized as fraudulent by a reliable international organization (Wikipedia Contributors). In fact, in the past the polls have been rigged. There have been multiple cases in the United States where the presidential election was under scrutiny dating back to 1793 all the way up to 2004 (Wikipedia Contributors). Despite Trump’s claim and the couple incident where it has happened, it is pretty impossible to actually “rig” an election with voter fraud. But, this does not mean that an election has never been rigged; they are rigged to an extent but not how Trump claimed.
In the book Critique of Violence ,author Walter describes Violence as "The intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, male development, or deprivation .The violence that is portrayed in the media has been debated for decades ,and it has rose a question about how does it influence the youth?. From movies to video games society has been accustom to seeing violence in their everyday entertainment. Since children are easy to be influence by their environment, it is safe to say that violence in the media can and will contribute to violent behavior.