Violent Media Is Good For Kids

According to Gerard Jones’s “ Violent Media Is Good For Kids,” violent media indeed has a remarkable influence upon the minds and general growth patterns of children. Jones argues that violent media can actually have positive effects on young people.

It is a matter of great importance how much of media content children are exposed to and what exactly they are viewing on media. The issue of violence is not a new phenomenon among children and keeps increasing with time and change in technology and information technology. The causes of violence in children are seen to be multifactorial and exposure of children to media violence is said to be an important factor when it comes to the etiology of behaviors that are violent among children.

“Violent Media is Good for Kids” is an article which makes many claims to support the argument that a controlled amount of violence could be good for a developing child. Even though this article is controversial the claims serve to support the argument. Throughout the analyzing process logos, ethos, and pathos are searched for and scrutinized. The rhetorical strategies are what makes a paper effective or not. In this case the author uses, what I believe, is just the correct amount of each and fulfills his goal for writing the article. Although this article is written more as a story it still provides information backing up the argument.

Violent Media is Good for Kids, by Gerald Jones; a persuasive article written by a comic book author that analyzes how exposing children to violent media has positive effects in shaping a person. This article was written as a counter-argument to the negative response media received after a horrific mass shooting that took place at a high school. Jones defends violent media by telling of his own personal experience with it, thus glorifying it in the process. Jones argues in his article that violent media is a helpful resource for children and it does not necessarily harm them. Jones’ argument was effective and very convincing. He defends his stance by continuously stating the positives that violent media has had not only on him, but his own son as well.

Gerard Jones is the author of the essay “Violent Media Is Good for Kids”. This essay is a very interesting piece about how violent media can actually help young kids get through stressful points in their life. I truly enjoyed reading this piece and it was very entertaining, but it didn't really convince me that violent media is good for young kids. I have two reasons why the author didn't convince me. The first is statistics, he didn't use any data or studies on the subject , and the second reason was the types media.

Over the past two decades, hundreds of studies have examined how violent programming on TV affects children and young people. While a direct "cause and effect" link is difficult to establish, there is a growing consensus that some children may be vulnerable to violent images and messages.

Violent Media is Good for Kids, by Gerard Jones was written on Wednesday, June 28th, 2000. It was published on the website, www.motherjones.com to present the positive effects some children receive from violent comic books, cartoons, graphic novels, rap music, and video games. The author, Gerard Jones, was introduced as a renowned comic-book author. The introduction described the author’s opinion as, “an argument by Jones that bloody videogames, gun-glorifying gangsta rap and other forms of ‘creative violence’ help far more children than they hurt, by giving kids a tool to master their rage.” The articles asked if the author was insightful or insane.

In 2000, Gerard Jones “ Violent Media is Good for Kids”, was published by MotherJones.com. Jones concludes that violence is beneficial to kids in many ways, including rage management, building confidence, and allowing children to meet their emotional and developmental needs. He also argues that when parents attempt to shield their kids from violence it is more likely that they grow up to be passive and easily manipulated. Based on my knowledge and personal experience, I have found many of his points to be true and logical.

“Violent Media Is Good for Kids” is a short essay written by Gerard Jones. In Jones’s essay, while the author was trying to convince the audience that violent media can be very beneficial when controlling rage along with a range of emotions and shaping children’s perceptions of life.in children but he falls flat when appealing to the logic and ethos, thus making it unlikely that his audience will side with him.

My initial response to Violent Media Is Good For Kids written by author Gerard Jones was a mixed reaction of sorts followed by a more suited neutral feeling. To explain this response I’ll just say that when I began reading the first page it felt relatable in a sense, the writing digested easily with me, even found myself smiling a little ways into the fourth paragraph. Then, suddenly, the sixth paragraph came smashing through with heavy shmuck and with that last-line-hitter, I really felt how cliché and cheesy this article really was going to be. Basically the typical points could have been made with out all the fluffy feel good input of do-good kids beating the odds in my opinion. Though extremely good points were made that children need an outlet to deal with natural instincts that are so often suppressed. This article still candy coats the truth and science of rage and the crazy

Hi Ju Young, I like this because it really did inform me about how violent media does have an effect on young children. For example, you found how violent video games can make children become violent, “‘the violent scripts observed in many violent video games to carry a weapon. This behavior also would be consistent with the schemas taught by the games that the world is a hostile place, and the beliefs promoted by the games that aggression is normative’ (Ybarra). Consistently, little children tend to mimic what they see on media such as TV shows, movies, and video games. Therefore, the likelihood of aggressive and the violent behavior increase from different term contexts. Importantly, early exposure to violent media in childhood leads to

author of “Violent Media is Good for Kids”. It is undeniable that the title of Jones’s essay

Media violence has a negative impact on children and adolescents. Younger and younger children our beginning to show increasingly violent behavior. There has been continuing speculation over the main cause of this. Not all media promotes violence, however all shows do involve violence and when children are exposed to it, it can easily lead to aggressive behavior. Children at younger ages often imitate the actions of characters or celebrities they see on television. Basically, before age four, children cannot distinguish fact from fantasy and their brains are something like a super-sponge. For example, Brotherson states that the ‘prime time’ for visual and auditory development, or a child 's capacity for learning to see and hear, is from birth to between 4 and 5 years old (2010). So when a child sees actors or actresses making certain gestures, s/he doesn’t know the exact reason for it. Flipping the finger, sticking one’s tongue out, and taunting are all common gestures on television that children will reenact in their lives.

How many hours did you spend watching TV last week? How many fighting scenes did you witness during one movie? Yeah, the Hulk and Spiderman might be super cool when they fight off the bad guys, and yeah, they are every kids hero, but, have you ever stopped to think what all of this violent media is doing to the minds of the younger generations? How it can affect them, not only now, but in the future? We may believe that what we see in movies, music videos, and video games is all fiction, and may never happen in real life, but that is not true. Children like to repeat what they see, not knowing whether it is good or bad. Examples like The Bobo Doll Study showed us that children who observed the

One of the biggest change in social environments today is the advance and increase usage of mass media. The mass media parent the children of today. Consequently, radio, video games, television, movies, videos, phones, and social networks play a significant role in their upbringing. For, they assist in influencing a child’s values, beliefs, and behaviors. Children rather unconsciously heed and imitate the images exhibited, for example, in television, they learn the appropriate way to comport and one’s countenance. Electronic mass media, in particular, contains an element that is harmful to children’s psychological being which is violence. Others argue that exposure to the commonly favored aggressive media are rather healthy for children in the way it allows them to express their belligerent side virtually and also enhance their confidence and creativity. However it 's a struggle for parents, they lose the battle regarding how much of aggressive media can their children consume since children have access to them everywhere. Evidently exposure to violence in video games, television, and movies for children and adolescents augments the risk of violent behavior similarly to how being raised in an environment containing real violence increases the risk of violent conduct.