The Immigrant Contribution Summary

America has been a melting pot of cultures for many centuries, with the number of immigrants continually rising every year. Most of these immigrants come into the country with nothing at all except for the clothes on their backs and a few English words. But they also bring with them something special – their cultures and traditions from their homeland. In the Immigrant Advantage, readers can see that these specific traditions that they bring with them give them an advantage because they tend to have better mental and physical health than their native born American counterparts (5).

Kennedy uses the metaphor “casting off the chains of poverty.” which is an overused and a definite cliche. He also uses fresher and more thought-provoking metaphors “the uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankind’s final war.” Kennedy rotates with his use of figurative language, he will display more cliched and overused metaphors and follow them up with unused material, he does this to connect all of the audience. Shakespeare also used this technique to keep his less-educated audience understanding the concept of his plays and with more advanced jokes

One way that John F Kennedy achieves his purpose of he wants more freedom and equality. Is through repetition because he says let both sides a lot and he's meaning that they want both sides to be equal.The use of repetition is to prove a point. In paragraph one John F kennedy says we observed today not a victory of a party. What John F Kennedy is saying in this quote is they are celebrating their freedom John F Kennedy is emphasizing the point we are happier This is a good that we can treat each other the same.

The diction and the tone of a story help structure a prompt for a writing work. The authors of “The Immigrant Contribution” and “A Quilt of a Country” uses diction and tone to build up their essays. Diction makes tone since the word choices produce how the author wants their audience to understand what he/she purposed on their writing. Without diction or tone, a writing would become boring and meaningless. Using the stories that were mentioned earlier, I will find how diction and tone support the author’s claim.

His main use of diction is progressing from an informal tone to a more serious one. The expression, “They seem to think that it’s easier for a camel to pass through the eye of the needle than for a Kennedy to come to the campus of Liberty Baptist College,” is used to joke with the audience at the start of the speech. Through that remark and the statement, “You may not appreciate the president, but the Democrats certainly appreciate the prayer,” he turns some of the disconnect between him and the students into comical banter. Recognizing that his audience is college-aged, Kennedy uses humor to make them more comfortable with him as a speaker. After establishing a positive rapport with the students, his tone becomes more sincere. Towards the end of his speech, Kennedy states, “That ideal shines across all the generations of our history and all the ages of our faith, carrying with it the most ancient dream.” This language is much more formal in an attempt to express the gravity of the issues. The shift from relaxed to proper word choice helps set the appropriate mood for different sections of the

Simply put, America is the land of opportunity. In the past, immigrants have left most of their family, memories, and familiarities with their homeland in search of a better life in America, where jobs were easy to find and the economy was booming. These immigrants formed almost the entire American population, a demographic anomaly in which people from nationalities separated by land and sea; these people come from countries separated by expansive distances can live within the same neighborhood. Both Anna Quindlen with her essay “A Quilt of a Country” and John F. Kennedy with his essay “The Immigrant Contribution” have documented the story of these immigrants and what they have done to contribute to the great country of the United States of America. Both authors have written in their own unique style which has changed the reader’s perspective of their accomplishments, contributions, and sense of community in their new nation. In the essays “A Quilt of a Country” by Anna Quindlen and “The Immigrant Contribution by John F. Kennedy, they show similar writing styles by both using the formal diction in their writing, and contradict in the way that Quindlen takes a more poetic approach in her writing, while Kennedy, being the President of the United States, uses more sophisticated dictions.

Another excerpt in Kennedy’s essay supports the aforementioned claim by using the formal and sophisticated dictions, which is written as follows: “But nearly all shared two great hopes: the hope for personal freedom and the hope for economic opportunity.” (Kennedy, 24). The formal diction expresses how immigrants have come to America with a hope shared by nearly all, a simple yet formal request: to have personal freedom and enjoy economic opportunity. This piece of evidence supports my claim that both Quindlen and Kennedy share the use of the formal diction in their writing. Both of the essays by Anna Quindlen and John F. Kennedy, respectively, share many similarities, one of which is the use of the formal diction in their writing.

One of these examples is his use of parallel structure, and he uses this when he states, "It is not the end of violence; it is not the end of lawlessness, and it's not the end of disorder" (39-40). This is parallel structure because he's repeating the words, "It is not the end of" followed by a noun, and this kind of structure is very successful as it makes others focus on what you have to say, because by repetition, it gets shoved in your head better, which is what he wants to accomplish. He uses parallel structure like this because he wants you to focus on the fact that we're still going to have violence and criminals in our society, and nothing is going to change about that. Kennedy also uses some parenthesis in this speech, and he uses this to separate an idea that he wants you to focus on. A good example of this is when he states, "For those of you who are black -- considering the evidence evidently is that there were white people who were responsible -- you can be filled with bitterness, and with hatred, and a desire for revenge."

By using technical diction, Kennedy is able to attract academic readers. In paragraph six and seven, Kennedy listed out famous industrialists that were immigrants and help build America up, and also scientists that made landmark discoveries or inventions. These list of people can be verified, and the long list helps reinforce Kennedy’s thesis by listing the immigrants and their contributions to the American society. Without these people, America will not be in its current glory, nonetheless being the global economic power and trade. Continuing, Kennedy uses numerical statistics to prove that not only immigrants help build America to its glory, they are an important part of the workforce and help change our culture significantly. By using clear numbers like “23.5 million people who came to America in this period,” and “20 percent of the businessmen, 20 percent of the scholars,…., and 61 percent of actors were of foreign births,” shows us the immense numbers of immigrants and their contributions to the American society. These numbers can be checked, which helps draw in some factual reader. Kennedy also uses abstract diction in his essay. In paragraphs fifteen, Kennedy uses abstract words with positive connotations. These words include “dream”, “confidence”, “possibility”, and “faith”. Words that Kennedy used here allows the reader to think that America is a perfect utopia for people who want to work hard and have a better life because of it. This diction is effective when it comes to empathetic and emotional people, in which Kennedy’s point can across more easily. Kennedy, in short, incorporated an excellent combination of abstract and technical diction to prove his point and also collect the same audiences like

Quindlen and Kennedy have similarities and differences in their styles.Both authors qoute outside sources to support what they're trying to get across. However, Kennedy uses factual data to make a better understanding, and Quindlen uses Metaphors/ Analogies. First ”The National Opinion Research center agreed with this statement:’The U.S. is a unique country that stands for something special in the world ’ ” (Quindlen 15).Secondly “A German farmer wrote home from Missouri in 1834, If you wish to see our whole family living in… a country where freedom of speech obtains , where no spies are eavesdropping, were no simpletons criticize your every word and seek to detect therein a venom that might endanger the life of the state, the church

In the speech, The “Spirit Of Liberty” Judge Learned Hand mentions that “Some of us have chosen America as the land of our adoption…” meaning that some of us purposely chose this country for a reason. He also mentions that immigrants are “...a group of those who had the courage to break from the past and brave the dangers and the loneliness of a strange land”. I agree with what Judge Learned Hand describes because people migrate from their country to a complete different location in order to receive better opportunity, not knowing the obstacles that are to come their

“We are nation of immigrants. Some came here willingly, some unwillingly. Nonetheless, we are immigrants, or the descendants of immigrants, one, and all. Even the natives came from somewhere else, originally. All of the people who come to this country come for freedom, or for some product of that extraordinary, illusory condition. That is what we offer here—freedom and opportunity in a land of relative plenty.” (Middletown Journal 2005)

These actions extended past racism between blacks and whites, to the various types of immigrants that attempted to call the United States their home. As the country continued to reap the benefits of financial and industrial growth during The Gilded Age, it also experienced an influx of immigrants wishfully hoping that American streets were truly paved with gold. Although these immigrants helped the country by propelling “the rapid growth of cities” because industries “needed large numbers of immigrant workers for its factories and mills” (The American Yawp, “American Empire”), they were not safe from xenophobic views and general hostility. Countless native-born Americans believed that “more immigrants would result in fewer jobs and lower wages”, “that immigrants brought radical ideas such as socialism and communism”, or that “new arrivals were unfit for American democracy” (The American Yawp, “American Empire”).

The final piece of evidence Nichols uses is by showing that the some of the United States’ most valuable people are immigrants: “Who speaks contemptuously of Alexander Hamilton as a foreigner, because he was born in one of the West India Islands? Who at this day will question the worth or patriotism of Albert Gallatin, because he first opened his eyes among the Alps of Switzerland”. He shows that allowing immigrants to come to the United States would only benefit the country, not harm it. Critical

A big aspect of JFK's innaugural speech is using antithesis which is two things that are completely opposite from