Throughout the history of the United States, it is true that a popular opinion amongst citizens has had an ability to impact the country as a whole. While some were in favor of the country becoming a “melting pot”, others strongly believed in restricting immigration into the country and hindering equality amongst the different races already there. In addition, the idea that foreigners were uncultured savages who needed help civilizing themselves seemed to dominate public opinion, leading to a negative view of potential diversity. These situations can be seen in the decades between 1880 and the First World War, illustrating how ideas and actions based upon racist ideologies influence both domestic and foreign affairs in the nation. After …show more content…
These actions extended past racism between blacks and whites, to the various types of immigrants that attempted to call the United States their home. As the country continued to reap the benefits of financial and industrial growth during The Gilded Age, it also experienced an influx of immigrants wishfully hoping that American streets were truly paved with gold. Although these immigrants helped the country by propelling “the rapid growth of cities” because industries “needed large numbers of immigrant workers for its factories and mills” (The American Yawp, “American Empire”), they were not safe from xenophobic views and general hostility. Countless native-born Americans believed that “more immigrants would result in fewer jobs and lower wages”, “that immigrants brought radical ideas such as socialism and communism”, or that “new arrivals were unfit for American democracy” (The American Yawp, “American Empire”). By 1920, “over twenty-five million immigrants arrived in the United States” (The American Yawp, “American Empire”), and the question of whether they would properly assimilate to the culture or keep their own threatened any aspirations for a unified society. This created an overall bias that America should “shut the door and breed up a pure, unadulterated American citizenship” (Smith, “Shut the Door”) in order to …show more content…
During the era of American Imperialism, a strong desire to further “ambitious designs on global power through military might, territorial expansion, and economic influence” (The American Yawp, “American Empire”) flooded the people and the government’s attention. Increasing the size of the nation with oversea lands created new resources, assisted industries with the formation of new markets, and permitted the creation of tactical military bases. Due to the prospective benefits of expansion, “the U.S. would become increasingly involved in international politics, particularly in Latin America” (The American Yawp, “American Empire”). Once initiated, the action of conquering foreign lands by “projecting America’s power across the oceans” (The American Yawp, “American Empire”) spread to territories such as Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Cuba, and the Philippines, despite the fact that these areas were already established by foreign rule. Under the claim of involving themselves in oversea events to “feed and clothe the world” (Beveridge, “The March of the Flag”) and promote democracy, the United States exploited these areas for personal gain. These “unexplored lands” were deemed to have a “savage wilderness” (Beveridge, “The March of the Flag”) society that required American intervention to civilize these inferior people. Even though morally one should “not to govern a people without
Guarding the Golden Door focuses on immigration policy in the United States beginning with the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. The book illustrates the transforming aspect of federal policies pertaining to immigration since 1882, and delves into meaningful statistics about the history of American immigrants up to the year 2000. Daniels details the obstacles immigrants faced with each new policy change and how Americans exhibited irrational fears towards newcomers (a sentiment still felt today) despite the reality that immigrants were crucial to the development of the American colonies. American
Immigrants began moving to the United States in the 1850s in search of new freedoms and opportunities. They were soon viewed as threats by the American people because they could potentially take away job opportunities from native born Americans. Additionally, the morality and capabilities of these foreign people were unknown. As a result, new social and economic policies that favored “real Americans” were enforced. These affected a large group of foreigners, including Jews, Catholics, Italians, southern Europeans, and the Chinese. (Fry 1)
This thesis compares events that occurred from 1875 to the 1930’s and present day that highlights that America had a bi-polar view on immigration from the 1875 to the 1930’s and still has a similar view on immigration today. The first part of this timeframe during the 1870’s and 80’s immigrants were welcomed with open arms and were offered incentives to come to the United States, then middle class Americans realized the new immigrants coming into America could be a threat to their lively hood and profits, they changed their stance and their welcoming attitudes towards new immigrants. Middle class Americans, whose ancestors were once immigrant’s their-selves, lobbied their political parties for immigration reform, and this is still happening
Since the dawn of American colonization in the early 1600s, the notion of immigrating to America has long been instilled upon various people as a stimulating opportunity to begin a fresh chapter in their lives. Even now, this possibility has brought many variations of people to America, culminating a society that brims with dreams and aspirations to form the diversified nation of today. When speaking of the current state of immigration, it is easy to conclude that immigration is heavily discussed from political standpoints. Though this current condition is composed of highly controversial perspectives, many of the early-century viewpoints found in literature genuinely embrace reality, for these writers were indeed immigrants themselves, thus adding an authoritative standpoint over immigration. The Americanization of Edward Bok (1921) by Edward Bok and The America I Believe In by Colin Powell, display the perspectives of two authors, who have lived as immigrants, through their own personal anecdotes. Both Edward Bok and Colin Powell convey a sincerely grateful tone and develop the idea of Americanization and the quest for opportunity through the use of connotative diction in contrast to the Immigration Chart and Political Cartoon which have a downright concrete and pessimistic tone and supports the idea that immigration exposes various challenges to incoming immigrants.
From 1917 through 1924 the Bolsheviks and, native-born Americans who weren’t immigrants during the time of World War I and the Bolshevik Revolution undergo many immigration acts as well as nationwide threats that spread throughout the U.S. This was done to Americanize people, and to restrict the amount of immigrants from entering the U.S. through government imposed acts. Alongside the widespread fear of anti communist crusades grabbed the American psyche in 1919 following a series of anarchist bombings and, raids. The National Origins Act that was ratified in 1924 was set to penalize Japanese immigrants in addition to southern and, eastern Europeans. Another example of Nativism at that time was when the Homemaking book of 1929 was published.
In 1917 America entered World War one. By doing this America played a grave role in conquering Germany and ushering peace to Europe. However, the Great War also meant that the US would change dramatically through historical issues and changes which resulted in American society. Industries had started to realise that it was not as simple as it was before to abstract the immigrants. As the country developed and became more successful it attracted outsiders who were searching for chances. During the 1920¡¯s the United States began to confine immigrants due to cultural and economical purposes. The immigrants faced several afflictions such as: racism and religious oppression. The examination of immigration expressed an important
In the late 19th, early 18th, century immigration became very prominent in America. Immigrants from around the world began to flood into America each one seeking something different, but it wasn’t always easy. Most immigrants faced many challenges, some negative and others positive. In fact, most immigrants fled to America for all the positive attributes it had to offer compared to the country they were previously living in.
In the eyes of the early American colonists and the founders of the Constitution, the United States was to represent the ideals of acceptance and tolerance to those of all walks of life. When the immigration rush began in the mid-1800's, America proved to be everything but that. The millions of immigrants would soon realize the meaning of hardship and rejection as newcomers, as they attempted to assimilate into American culture. For countless immigrants, the struggle to arrive in America was rivaled only by the struggle to gain acceptance among the existing American population.
The 1840s and 50s experienced a massive escalation in the number of immigrants from Europe especially from Ireland, and Germany, arriving on U.S shores in densely populated urban areas (Arenson, 2011). Most of them afterward became vigorous in domestic politics, much to the aggravation of old-stock, authentic Americans. The consequence was a renaissance in the formation of “nativistic” societies (small, indistinct, anti-foreign and anti-catholic organizations), some which banded together in the early 1850s to form the American Party (Arenson, 2011). Commonly referred to as the “Know-Nothing,” the party rode a wave of racial intolerance as well as racism into the mid-1850s.
Daniels, Roger. Not like Us: Immigrants and Minorities in America, 1890-1924. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1997.
The collection “Coming to America” is comprised of journal entries, biographies, and autobiographies that discuss the social and political transformations that arose from immigration. “Of Plymouth Plantation”, “Balboa”, and “‘Blaxicans’ and Other Reinvented Americans” illustrate how immigrants shape America’s direction. The changes that occurred when settlers migrated seriously impacted the nation they were travelling to. The first of these changes pertains to culture. Immigrants brought their religions and languages to their host country, and that caused a great deal of acculturation, usually to the new religion or language. Government is another principle that was implemented into the “inner workings” of the new country. Lastly, the newcomers
history focuses on the conquest of new land through westward expansion and global imperialism. Starting with the roots of frontier and building up into a huge network of land and territory evokes a common and national goal among the American people during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Frontier and expansion of the great west allowed for the United States to gain power and work its way up to bigger and better: the world. With so much land to acquire and such a desire to conquer, the United States was able to build its coveted empire, but only with a certain cost. The damages and death brought about by westward expansion and imperialism greatly outweigh the benefits. The United States grew rapidly and was able to spread its culture like wildfire but the territories and nations that were to be civilized were damaged victims. Culture was destroyed and the United States’ reputation was tarnished during this time period. Growing discontent in the county continued to escalate throughout the twentieth century and our country wasn’t united and failed to share a national
In the United States, the cliché of a nation of immigrants is often invoked. Indeed, very few Americans can trace their ancestry to what is now the United States, and the origins of its immigrants have changed many times in American history. Despite the identity of an immigrant nation, changes in the origins of immigrants have often been met with resistance. What began with white, western European settlers fleeing religious persecution morphed into a multicultural nation as immigrants from countries across the globe came to the U.S. in increasing numbers. Like the colonial immigrants before them, these new immigrants sailed to the Americas to gain freedom, flee poverty and
“We are nation of immigrants. Some came here willingly, some unwillingly. Nonetheless, we are immigrants, or the descendants of immigrants, one, and all. Even the natives came from somewhere else, originally. All of the people who come to this country come for freedom, or for some product of that extraordinary, illusory condition. That is what we offer here—freedom and opportunity in a land of relative plenty.” (Middletown Journal 2005)
Allured by the promise of freedom and endless opportunities, immense crowds of hopeful immigrants thronged American ports. These immigrants fled to America to escape religious and political prosecution, wars, famines, or merely to pursue a new life. Upon arrival, they quickly realized that they would be facing unpleasant conditions in the Land of Opportunity, as well. Once setting foot on America’s shores, the immigrants were exposed to racism, nativism, and strong stereotypes, a new kind of persecution that was unforeseen by the hopeful newcomers. Immigrants' hopes of achieving the American dream diminished quickly as they faced discrimination, poor working conditions, and restrictive laws and acts from 1850 to 1925.