The Evolution of Democracy in the Early Republic President Jefferson and President Jackson were two complete different people. Though each one had their flaws, they also had some good intentions throughout their presidency. The government was different under each president because each one had their own ideas for America. There is a chain of causes that made America the way it was under each president. Jefferson was a good person but was not the best president because he always thought about himself and never what everyone else wanted. Jackson was not a good person but he was a good president because he got things done as a president. He did thing that were good not only for him but for America 's future. Jefferson accomplished a lot while he was president that affected everyone at this time and even us today. While Jefferson was president, he wrote the Declaration of Independence. It was written to declare the independence the colonies had from Great Britain. He also stated that all men should be created equally and stated that slavery is against our most important rights, life and liberty itself. Jefferson wrote a bill establishing that all virginia schools were to give all children male or female, get three years of teaching in writing, reading arithmetic and history. He also came up with the Louisiana Purchase. It was land deal between the U.S. and France. In order to buy all this land he used Hamilton 's finacial plan, which was a good plan until it provoked the
Jefferson also started the Luis and Clarke Expedition, founded University of Virgin. He also founded the U.S. Military Academy, He also made a statue if the middle of the University of Virginia because he wanted to symbolizes that Virginia is free from slavery. Thomas Jefferson did a lot more, and I felt like that's what a good president would do.
Thomas Jefferson was the president who nearly doubled the size of the United States. This was one of the great things Thomas Jefferson did during his presidency. Thomas Jefferson was a Republican who had many accomplishments including letting the power of the judicial review, The Louisiana Purchase, The Lewis and Clark expedition, and the signing the Non-Intercourse Act. Out of all the good things that Jefferson did we can conclude that Jefferson's presidency was a success.
The same man that was president two times, first secretary of state, second vice president, wrote the Declaration of Independance, and had many inventions like a polygraph is running for another office. Renaissance man of the Early America. Jefferson will have a hard run against a great man Ben Franklin. While Franklin may have improved every day life for many americans by creating bifocals, fire departments and hospitals. Jefferson helped our government grow to be one of the strongest governments in the world. He grow the size of what we have to govern by one third, and he did it cheap too. He helped the government during the revolution by always working on documents. He also held multiple government positions and did a lot during this time. Jefferson helped country be
The Democratic-Republican president worked to reduce the Federalist influence in the judiciary that was compromised. He fired many government officials to reduce government spending on wages. Jefferson eliminated taxes and paid the country's debts. His administration reduced the military fighting capabilities and created more favourable economic conditions in the country. The Louisiana Purchase was unconstitutional, but it was intended to end the presence of France in the US. He signed embargos against any trade with the France and England only worsening their relations. The greatest achievement he made was to criminalize the slave trade (Cunningham, 2005. Pg
Thomas Jefferson had a major impact on the United States while he was in office. He wanted a weak central government and a strong state government. Jefferson did not want the same type of government that Britain had. Thomas Jefferson also valued education. He recommended that the state governments push further into free education for all white males. Thomas Jefferson also cut national debt from $83 million to $45 million, despite paying $15 million for the Louisiana Territory, before his presidency came to a close. He majorly cut government spending in his administration as well as on the military. During Jefferson's presidency, he banned all European trade from American ports in response to violations of United States neutrality by Britain
because Andrew Jackson and Thomas Jefferson were very different people, and they both created the main beliefs in their own democracies. Although they are both thought of as very similar, their core beliefs were very different. These differing core beliefs, just to name a few, were their feeling on the powers of strong federal government, their stances on slavery, and their feelings on industrialism.
President Thomas Jefferson was a moderate and pragmatic politician whom placed the nation’s best interest above those of the state. Jefferson was a very strict constructionist before he was elected president, during his presidency he was forced to exhibit a more federalist side do to the best interest of the nation. During his presidency he was faced with debt, the Louisiana Purchase, and after his presidency all could agree that he placed America first. Jefferson was one of the few historical heroes that became a living legend.
President Jefferson's presidency was more beneficial for the new American republic than, Madison's presidency due to, the achievements President Jefferson made. Such as, the acquirement of the Louisiana Territory which, doubled the U.S.’s territory. Furthermore, he reduced taxes by reducing the size of the federal government's military and retiring warships. Nevertheless, President Jefferson's presidency was only more beneficial due to, the events that transpired during his presidency. Thus, his presidency could have been very different if he and President Madison's terms were switched.
President Andrew Jackson served as President of the United States from 1826 to 1837 and is looked at my many as one of the best presidents in American history. Jackson was a man without many limits and did what he wanted because he simply wanted to do it, not because it was necessarily the popular opinion or Constitutional. This caused a lot of problems, but also was very beneficial in making solutions to problems in the country. Although, as a result of this, many people saw him as a dictator-like tyrant and didn’t agree with his pandering towards the uneducated, more working class civilians during his campaign. President Jackson’s presidency was controversial as a result in debate over his political tactics as well as possibly overstepping his Constitutional boundaries when it came to the amount of power he exuded on the people; therefore, many people spoke out against his “uneducated followers” as well as his aggressive style while some evidence shows that these efforts were supported.
Leading up to their elections, the political standing and objectives of the two men greatly differed, Jefferson the epitome of a republican, and Jackson a new age of democrat. What holds back both of these early American presidents from being great is their being incapable of standing by the political ideals they were elected upon. Starting with Jefferson, he backtracked on three specific policies. They are: desiring an agrarian republic, supporting small government, and lastly fostering freedom for all.
Jefferson not only shaped the nation, but also our society today. “The Declaration of Independence is a famous document for many reasons. It declared the colonies independence from Great Britain. It stated basic rights and liberties for Americans. The French used the ideals behind the Declaration as a model for their own revolution in 1789,”(Thomas Jefferson Foundation). Jefferson’s ways not only changed America, but also affected other countries. Jefferson had also took hand in designing the capitol in Virginia, Richmond; he also helped with the designs of new government buildings. As well as,contributing to the country in many ways, one was when he took hand in creating our money system, now he is on the nickel. Jefferson had also created
If Andrew Jackson and Thomas Jefferson faced off, many would argue over which president was better leader and who was more effective. Jackson and Jefferson have more differences among them then they have alike, but they both stood in their beliefs and completed major events that helped with the writings of America’s history. If Jefferson or Jackson had an idea in mind that needed to be completed, they were very effective to get that job done in an efficient time. Both presidents held professions before office and out of the eight years both presidents held in office, many acts were created which aided both men to accomplish the ideas they had. Jackson’s daily life and attitude was considerably different compared to Jefferson but that didn 't stop him from getting his job done. Over all Jefferson was the better president and was more efficient thought his works.
History remembers the ones that we hold up for their accomplishments. Thomas Jefferson is one of the American presidents that vastly contributed to the current form of our government. Jefferson, the third President of the United States, primarily remembered for two main achievements; he made the Declaration of Independence and made the Louisiana Purchase possible to Americans. From the fear of losing free Trade and having European Neighbors, Jefferson wanted to purchase the territory of Louisiana. Specifically, Jefferson was afraid that foreign countries would occupy the city of New Orleans, which controls the Mississippi River that serves as a major trade route for American merchants. Although the territory was somewhat expensive for America, it had a lot of advantages. Firstly, the purchase treaty eliminated any chances of European presence in the American Continent, especially France. Secondly, it prevented Jefferson from forming a military alliance with Britain. In addition, it provided peaceful relations with the French. Also, it gave Americans the Mississippi River, which played a huge role in the use of free trade. The Louisiana territory has a strategic location between many countries, and Thomas Jefferson understood the importance of laying his hand on it. Also, he understood that the purchase would literally allow the US to double its size and empower the National Government (Balleck). I will try to analyze the benefits of the purchase, to the citizens of the
Both Presidents wanted to support the “common man” and create a government where the majority carried the most influence. They opposed the Bank and believed the Constitution gave specific powers to the President, and were both democrats who believed the nation was founded on the work of the lower classes, and that the rich should not receive special privileges simply because of their status. Jefferson was against anything that he felt would hurt the “common man”, such as the Bank and a strong central government. He was also a strong supporter of the Bill of Rights, advocating for protecting the privileges of the people. Jackson favored common people over the wealthy and his presidency shifted the power from New England to the western farmers. He also opposed the Bank, and furthered his opposition when he took drastic measures to dispose of the Bank. Jefferson and Jackson were undoubtedly similar in their drive and willingness to provide the best for the “common man”. While they were similar in this way, Jefferson bent his ideals while purchasing the Louisiana Territory because it was an opportunity for the nation. Jackson, however, stayed true to his policies and shut down the Bank because the Constitution did not give him the power to create one. Jefferson’s support of the “common man” was limited to farmers, whom he supported by promoting nation wide education, suppressing industrialization and expanding the boundaries of America. Jackson’s support was more intense, taking the money out of the Bank and dispersing it into state banks for example. He supported the laborers and mechanics by believing that anyone is qualified for office, and by removing the Indians from lands west of the Mississippi in order to calm internal
If the nature of democracy may be understood via its etymological roots, demos (people) and kratos (power) arguably, in its very meaning, the system reflects an idealistic depiction of its primal iteration (that is, in 5th century Athens) rather than, for instance, the cogs of representative democracy that turn at the present – or so Western society likes to believe. In part, the significant distinction between the constructs is the constitution of the demos, Thorley estimates that it refers to between 12% and 17% of the Athenian population , and of course 66.1% of the UK population in the most recent general election. Hence, with a progressive understanding of politics one might assume that ‘the intermediary’ institutions of the Roman res publica (Senate and various Assemblies) lie somewhere within this linear democratic movement. Generally, however, political change is neither progressive nor linear and to this extent the Roman res publica was not the blending point that we might like it to be; it was not Aristotle’s “advantage to the poor” nor, in some ways, was it, as M. Cicero suggests, in “hands [where] the welfare of the commonwealth was the most important” . Rather, Roman political organs may be said to have malignly mutated from the schemata of Pericles’ Athenian government to the coup and later dictatorship of Sulla in 88BC; potentially, from which the elements of democracy, as it were, became unrecognisable to the Athenian gaze; and finally to the fall of the