Susan B Anthony Analysis

In fact, woman Political activist had been irritated to think that black men would get rights as a citizen before them. Woman at this time were not considered citizens. “Fifteenth amendment, which was also designed to address citizenship generally and the position of former slaves more particularly, specified that states could not discriminate in providing the right to vote on the basis of “race, color, or previous condition of servitude”.”(Ritter, Pg. 352) After this amendment woman had fought more for their right to have political standings. Ritter had shown that claims that woman were not citizens before or during this

ruary 15, 1820 by her father, Daniel Anthony, and mother Lucy Read ("Susan B."). Anthony followed her father's religion, which was a Quaker; believes that an Inner Light, or God's spirit, dwelled within each person (Colman 12). Daniel installed the ideas of self-reliance, self-discipline, self-worth and self-sufficient on his children ("Susan B."). Lucy was a wise counseled, tender watching, self-sacrificing devoted mother (Coleman 12). Both of Anthony's parents were strong supporters of the abolitionist: antislavery. Also, they believed in the importance of education and work ("Susan B."). One of the bigger setbacks for Anthony's family was the Panic of 1837, Daniel lost everything, from their clothing, wedding gifts and appliances to the

Susan B. Anthony was born February 15, 1820 in Adams, Massachusetts. Susan B. Anthony was an active woman suffragist who played a big part in the women's rights movement, in 1852. She didn’t only fight for women's rights, she also fought to abolish slavery. Both Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton also helped with social reform. They founded the National Woman Suffrage Association.

Three Years after “Speech before Congress” was delivered by Carrie Chapman Catt, a well-known leader of the women 's suffragist movement were women granted the right to vote and receive all rights as citizens. Catt’s speech was a major stepping stone for Congress to pass the 19th amendment. She was able to deliver her speech in a manner, which was persuasive to congress because it encompassed all the rhetorical appeals. Not only did she describe benefits to enfranchising women, she also spoke to the patriotism of her audience to further her cause. Catt crafted her argument by presenting herself with authority and knowledge, she also used undeniable logic by referring historical precedence, and she evoked sympathy in her audience by describing the trials of disenfranchised women to create a powerful argument.

In “Address to Congress on Women’s Suffrage,” women’s suffrage is recognized. Carrie Chapman is giving a speech to men stating that suffrage is inevitable. She illuminates three main points that develop her theme. First, the history of the country, second, the suffrage for women already established in the US already makes suffrage of the nation inevitable, and third, leadership of the US democracy compels enfranchisement of their women. For the first point, the text states, “The American Revolutionists boldly proclaimed the heresies : “Taxation without

Susan B. Anthony was born February 15, 1820 and raised in very religious household. She first started off as teacher before she became and extravagant women that not just worked for herself but for many other women’s rights. Susan B. Anthony should be a historical figure due to the fact that she went through so much suffering. In which she fought for the women’s right to vote and as well as gender equality. Not only did she just fight for women’s right but as well to get rid of alcohol and did not support slavery by campaigning against them. People look down on her and despise her due to the reasoning that she voted illegally and took matter in to her own hands and was put into prison for it. Which cause women to get more hate and not receive their equal rights faster. Another reasoning people might not think she should be historical is because she said a racist comment. Despite all these things she dint just think of herself but for everyone. She never gave up and always kept writing and lecturing about equality which has helped every women have equal right and as well inspired many women that anything can be possible no matter their gender.

Susan B. Anthony has gone through many rough times and had to go through many obstacles. She has had many ideas to try and get women equal rights. Susan, I believe, is an amazing person to accomplish what she did. This is the reason she should be in the History Hall of Fame.

Some would argue that Susan B. Anthony’s speech on the rights of women voters was not an entirely effective argument. The quickest opposing viewpoint would be to attack Anthony as a credible source; after all, she just had been arrested and was awaiting her trial – a trial that would end in a guilty verdict (Linder, “Trial”). It is hard to believe that someone that broke the law could be a reliable source. An additional argument against Anthony’s credibility

Anthony alludes to documents that the United States has passed to justify her argument. Furthermore, Anthony articulates the statement “All men are created equal, and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights” from the United States Constitution to indicate that she did not commit a crime when voting. In contrast, she was “simply exercising my citizen’s right, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any State to deny.” In other words, the Constitution that was given to us by the Founding Fathers, explains that she did abide by the God given virtue of the freedom of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Through an effective explanation of the actions of illegally voting, Anthony fritters robust ethics and logic that support her claim that women should have the right to

On February 15, 1820 in Adams, Massachusetts, a woman by the name of Susan Brownell Anthony was born to parents Daniel and Lucy (Read) Anthony. She was the second born of a strongly rooted Quaker family of eight (Hist.Bio.-1). Because they lived in a Quaker neighborhood, Susan was not heavily exposed to slavery. The family made anti-slavery talks an almost daily conversation over the dinner table. She also saw men and women on the same level (Stoddard 36). “A hard working father, who was not only a cotton manufacturer, but a Quaker Abolitionist also, prevented his children from what he called childish things such as toys, games and music. He felt that they would distract his children from reaching their peak of

Susan B. Anthony’s speech on women’s rights to vote explains the fact that women deserve the right to vote in America just as much as men do. Upon giving this speech, Anthony was recently arrested for voting in the most recent presidential election. By giving this speech, she intended to prove the innocence of herself and all women trying to vote. Anthony first makes the point that women are equal citizens to men. Then she makes several grievances to the Constitution, arguing that the document protects the rights of all citizens of the United States of America, even quoting it. Finally, she points out that one of these protected rights is that to vote, stressing her point that as an American citizen, she is entitled to her right to vote. These

Susan Brownell Anthony was a magnificent women who devoted most of her life to gain the right for women to vote. She traveled the United States by stage coach, wagon, and train giving many speeches, up to 75 to 100 a year, for 45 years. She went as far as writing a newspaper, the Revolution, and casting a ballot, despite it being illegal.

In Susan B. Anthony’s speech, she reasons that the constitution grants these rights to not just male or white male citizens, but to “the whole people”(Source E) making the purpose of voting to serve as a means to “secure the blessing of liberty”(Source E) for oneself, and Anthony believed everyone should have an opportunity to participate. The pathos emotion in her diction moves the listener to feel what she was feeling, insisting that “women are citizens”(Source E) just like men. Hence, many women and people of color in the U.S. find themselves having to stand up to the authorities or the government to explain that they deserve to exercise the same liberties given to everyone else, sometimes in vain. In her speech, Anthony has to do just that, convince her listeners throughout her speech that she in fact committed no crime at all, but simply “exercised her citizens rights”(Source E). In order to do this, he even went as far as saying that laws that limited women and other minorities voting capabilities was a “violation of the supreme law”(Source E). Moreover, the modern day voting system reflects, under closer inspection, that the power does not truly lie with the people, but only with the representatives elected by the people-- which impedes on the civil liberties of the entire country. Such corrupt systems of government imposing laws limiting the freedom of particular groups further prove that civil liberty

If I were to shine like a new Susan b Anthony would you use me until I dull or keep me and say this one is mine

In the early stages of the year 1873, social reformer, women's rights advocate, proponent of feminism, Susan B. Anthony, shed’s light on women being able to have a lawful right to vote, with an influential speech, that leads to equality for women and men, this protest coordinates women and voting, but also opens opportunity for women in everything that they do. Susan B. Anthony supports her claims in a forceful manner, by explaining the amount of suffrage taking place in women's lives, as a result of the lack of rights they have, she gives a valid example by explaining her arrest, for “the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote”, she states that she did not commit a crime, she just exercised her rights as a citizen guaranteed by the National Constitution. Anthony’s purpose is to exert the rights for women that are in the Constitution, that are being overlooked by the United States Government. She establishes a compelling tone for whom it applies to.