Starbucks has revealed their signature red holiday cups and they are causing quite the controversy. In the past, they have been decorated with traditional holiday designs like snowmen, or ornaments. This year, they are a simple red cup with a light color on the top that shades into a deep red on the bottom of the cup. So why are some people so angry about it?
Many Christians seem to believe that Starbucks is now anti-Christmas, or as self-proclaimed social media personality and evangelist Joshua Feuerstein claims, they believe that taking snowflakes off of the coffee cups means that Starbucks These people seem to be taking the removal of snowmen as a personal attack. Others say that the is attempting to be politically correct or all-inclusive . Starbucks posted the announcement about the red cups on their website. The vice president of Design and Content explains the meaning behind the cups.
…show more content…
If Starbucks is, in fact, anti-Christmas, why are they selling This situation is ridiculous. It appears that some people are just looking for a fight or a way to cause commotion. Others feel the same way
I agree with this post. I also think that the world has many more important problems, like child hunger, cancer, or school shootings to worry about rather than wasting their time and money on coffee cups. In conclusion, the outrage at the Starbucks red holiday cups is completely unnecessary. Removing snowflakes and snowmen from coffee cups is not an attack on religion; it is simply a minimalistic new
Starbucks value statement says, "Creating a culture of warmth and belonging, where everyone is welcome" (Starbucks). In November of 2015, Starbucks, the popular coffeehouse chain, released their Holiday-themed cups. Shockingly, they were plain red, a simple cup. These cups were an extreme difference when compared to years past, where they featured vintage ornaments or hand-drawn reindeer. To say the least, the conservative community was outraged at these red cups, which were seen as politically correct or offensive. These two articles: "Starbucks 'removed Christmas from their cups because they hate Jesus, ' Christian says in viral Facebook video," written by Justin Wm. Moyer; and "Satire: Red Cup Controversy" written by Jessica Machado, justify the claim that the conservatives were outraged at the values these cups illustrated. To capture the controversy, Machado and Moyer use similar sources and appeals to value, but deal differently with opposition and appeals to logic. When creating this argument, satire is a more effective rhetorical strategy than straightforward rhetoric because it has the power to exaggerate the situation and produce richer appeals to value and logic.
Starbucks, a large corporation that sells trendy coffee, has a well-known tradition of creating holiday cups to go along with their seasonal drinks. There is also a tradition of criticizing the cups. In 2015, the year of controversy over the Starbucks holiday cups, Christians had the perception that Judah-Christian values were being attacked under the Obama Administration. Author Emma Green, wrote “The Inanity of the Starbucks Christmas Cup ‘Controversy’,” published in 2015 in The Atlantic, she argues that in order for a business such as Starbucks to appeal to all of their consumers they need to express neutral seasonal greeting, to appeal to a broad and diverse consumer base throughout the world, a lot of which is not Christian or religious. Emma Green establishes her argument by using quotes from very influential people and a great number of facts from reputable sources. Green’s argument is able to appeal to her readers with her use of sarcasm, ethos, and logos.
Our mission: to inspire and nurture the human spirit – one person, one cup and one neighborhood at a time. Starbucks has lived up to that motto each and every year and with such great numbers and great feedback the company keeps on growing in the right direction. Starbucks is well known around the world for delivering fast, efficient coffee in all forms. From their frappachino’s, to their brew coffee and ice tea they are definitely the set example that other company’s in their area follow. They live by six principles that they practice each and every day they represent there coffee which has always been there passion to deliver
In 2015, Evan Hefer, a United States Army and Special Forces Veteran decided after 20 years of government service it was time for him to retire and so he decided to start a business doing what he loved, roasting coffee. As a child Evan grew up smelling the various aromas of his father and grandfather’s coffee, in high school he learned to love the taste and years later he fell in love with a barista and the true passion came. When asked why he created the small business Evan Hefer simply stated “I created Black Rifle Coffee Company for people like myself, coffee-loving veterans and those who are committed to supporting the 2nd Amendment. I wanted to create a company that roasted the finest, freshest coffee on the planet that also
The target audiences are ready for bring their reusable mug to get free drinks in campaign day. They do not worry about anything.Starbucks owes its success to a well-defined target audience!
Woods coffee does not support what Starbucks coffee supports they are a religious company.Woods coffee is a Christian company, therefore it does not support Starbucks, a LGBTQ+ company. The owner is also Christian and in all Woods coffee shops you may notice that he plays a Christian radio station. When Bellingham was having a gay pride parade, the owner of woods coffee didn’t want the parade to go in front of his store because of economic reasons but mostly because of his religion. In the King James version Bible,
Although there was some bad publicity, most of the talk on social media was actually defending Starbucks for their choice on the plain red holiday cup. So I guess they did benefit quite a bit from this past holiday season. The #ItsJustACup mocked those who made the plain cup such a big ordeal. I do not think Starbucks hates Christmas or Jesus. I believe people decided to blow it out of proportion and everyone wants to complain about something. Starbucks just so happened to be in the line of fire this time around. The next time it will be someone else and sadly there always will be someone else. Every side of this controversy has some type of evidence to say what they believe is true. The hardest part is deciding for yourself it its true. Do you believe that Starbucks hates Jesus because they decided to go with a plain red cup? If so, you are missing the true point of Christmas and you should rethink how you view your religion because it shouldn’t be based on a cup or what other people
Starbucks’ new coffee cups supports non-denominational holiday sentiments. However, in an attempt to cause the least amount offense to any religion or belief, the private company offended Josh Feuerstein - by not putting christian symbols! The plain red cup, under speculation for being anti-christmas, has caused too much outcry for just being a cup - especially in light of the more prevalent problems in our society.
Starbucks created the cup to let costumers create their own holiday story, like a blank canvas. Let the holidays be jolly for everyone, it’s a time for giving and helping other people. The Christians who are concerned about a cup need to take a step back and exam other problems going on. Personally I believe they should be using their time and energy to do things like giving trees, food drives, coat drives and trying to give underprivileged families a Christmas they deserve. Starbucks is incorporating and accepting of everyone and every
Starbucks has yet to spend a dime on advertising their holiday beverages. The Starbucks spokesperson also said, “our core value as a company is to create a culture of belonging, inclusion, and diversity, something Christ did himself. Not saying Starbucks is a Christian company, but as a Christian and a former pastor Joshua Feuerstein should have known this. Now because of his actions all Christians are looked at as a bunch of judgmental religious hypocrites, but we’re all a mess and we need God.
The policemen of political correctness have demanded that the silent majority bend its knee to a vocal minority’” (Moyer), but his opinion is not common in the general population. The majority of people agree with the removal of the snowflake as stated by one person, “‘Starbucks is trying to remain neutral and be culturally sensitive to everyone by leaving them blank. You are offended that they don't say Merry Christmas, but Jewish people would be offended if it only said that, not Happy Hanukkah. So they are leaving them blank so they can't offend anyone’”
Starbucks customers are diverse, well educated, young business people looking for a quick and easy way to grab coffee on their way to work. Starbucks values a strong relationship with their customers so they are
Their mission statement from the company profile is as follows: “Our mission is to inspire and nurture the human spirit – one person, one cup, and one neighborhood at a time.” Their core competencies can be defined as high quality coffee and products at accessible locations and affordable prices provided a community to share in the coffee drinking experience, and variety of choices. They also value ethics and good business practices and are a leader being voted one of 2010’s most ethical businesses by Ethisphere magazine for the 4th year running. (“Starbucks”) CEO Howard Schultz summed it up nicely when he said, “We remain highly respectful of the culture and traditions of the countries in which we do business. We recognize that our success is not an entitlement, and we must continue to earn the trust and respect of customers every day.”
Starbucks is renowned for its morality due to their innovative sustainability and environmental policies and operations. They strive to go beyond mandated regulations by implementing ethics as part of their core practices. However, no matter how flawless their code of ethics is; they, too, face ethical issues and commit unethical acts. First, they are responsible for putting small, local coffee shops out of business which creates a uniform retail culture throughout cities. Second, they advertise to provide 100% fair trade coffee when it is not truly 100% fairly traded. Third, they use hormone added milk that is detrimental to the human body as well as the environment. Fourth, they set unrealistic, unattainable recycling goals, so they were unachievable; in turn, their trustworthiness is hindered and their reputation is tarnished. Lastly, it was revealed that Starbucks discovered ways to avoid paying taxes in the UK. To this day, Starbucks continues to be recognized as an ethical company. Although sometimes controversial, they are innovatively striving to positively change the ways of society and business operations.
Starbucks acted ethically after their financial scare by upgrading their coffee equipment for their customers. Also, Starbucks added a new menu item to offer customers a more dynamic selection in their stores. Starbucks began to think more along the lines of a small mom and pop coffee shop to fit in with the local stores. To continue, Starbucks plays a significant ethical role within the community. Starbucks donates too many charitable causes within the community. Also, Starbucks allows their customers to provide feedback about their local coffee shop. Due to this ethical behavior, Starbucks gains new customers by offering them a place to relax and give their input on their