The American Persona is basically the average person or personality of America; what they say, think, and how they act. Rational choice theory is an assumption that people always make prudent and logical decisions that usually benefit or satisfy them to their own personal interest. In my opinion, being American is eating a lot and gaining weight. It is also having freedom of speech, of religion, of expression, etc. and having rights to bare arms, equal justice, etc. But do we really? Rational choice theory and the American persona are closely related. You might ask in what way they are related, well they both are personalities in a way. The average American uses rational choice theory. Many of them only think about what's …show more content…
In addition to freedom of speech, we don't really have it, if you say the wrong thing you can be sent to prison or sued for offending others. Is that really freedom? In reality we have the freedom to many things as long as the government approves. We don't have as much freedom as we're lead on to have. They tell us we have the right to equal justice, bullshit. There's so much white privilege. Any colored person can commit a minor crime and be arrested but white people can be let off the hook in similar situations, but we're equal though, right? Colored kids are being killed and harassed by cops for just walking on the street, but they would never do that to a white kid it is all kinds of messed up but it's what people have to deal with while being in America, home of the …show more content…
You are able to believe in anything; God, no god, science, the devil, music, yourself, politics, or anything that makes you happy, even batman. You are able to believe in what you want, unlike many other countries. For example in North Korea it's a must to believe in their supreme leader and look up to him as though he was some god even though he isn't. In America you can express your sexuality and be who you want to be with no one stopping you, except your parents if you're a minor. You can be gay, lesbian, straight, transgender, and so on. The fact that it's legal to have same sex marriage is a huge accomplish because even though people don't like it they're going to have to deal with it because no one can stop love and people are going to have to accept
Being American means taking a risk, going outside of your comfort zone to discover more about yourself,
As Michael Walzer essay’s introduction to “What Does It Mean to Be an America”, discusses American as an adjective and how easy it is being an American; then he discusses how these two factors lead to their political identity (Walzer). As mentioned above, the term American is relevant to all people that populate the North American territory. Walzer stated it as: “it is not
This paper will cover two criminological theories and they will be applied to two types of criminality. The two theories chosen for the paper were developmental theory and rational choice theory. The two types of crimes that were chosen were organized crime, specifically focusing on gangs, and terrorism. Then the crimes will be compared and contrasted. Finally, the developmental theory will be applied to organized crime to explain why and how it happens. The rational choice theory will be applied to terrorism to explain what compels individuals to attempt this form of criminality.
Introduction Based on the 2016 Canadian Crime Statistics it was discovered that the theory that best described Canada is the Rational Choice Theory. This theory explains that when people desire to commit a crime they have more reasons and see more positive outcomes with committing the crime and disobeying the law than not. Like most, Canadian citizens pick and choose their battles with committing crimes; they know what is legal and good, along with what is illegal and bad. The rational choice theory shows that most of the crimes being committed, were crimes that could possibly help support the committers families. Even though the cost of the crime was big, they had more reasons to commit the crime do to the larger outcomes
It is unfortunate that crime exists in our daily lives. There really is no way to stopping crime completely, no matter how many laws or punishment are present, people will continue to keep breaking rules. There are many theories of why that may be the case, for example, Caesar Lombroso and his “atavistic” theory with the Positivist School theory and how people were “born criminals”, or the Rational Choice Theory, devised by Cornish and Clarke, described that people could think rationally and how people will naturally avoid pain and seek pleasure referred to as “hedonism” (Cartwright, 2017, lecture 4). Since it is apparent that crime will continue to exist, it is not only important to understand the study of crime and the feedbacks to it,
To be an American in my opinion means you have freedom, and the right to do what you desire. An American can decide what sports they want to play, what classes they want to take, what job they want in the future. Being an American means that you have the right to choose your religion and the type of person you are. Also, to be an American it means that you serve the country in the best way possible and respect those who do serve the county, such as soldiers. Being an American means you have the right to vote for a worthy president. Many countries lack the privilege that America has, and sometimes a person doesn't realize the opportunities they get when living in America.
Criminology is the study of why individuals commit crimes. Several sociologists and criminologists have developed theories that attempt to explain criminal behavior and why it occurs. In earlier times, theories such as biological determinism and phrenology were often used to explain criminal behavior. Those theories have since been proven to be unreasonable and unrealistic. As time passed, sociologists and criminologists created more plausible theories including the rational choice, classical, conflict, labeling, life course, critical, strain, social disorganization, routine activity, social control, and positivist theories. In attempts to better understand these criminological theories, an individual could apply one (or more) of these theories to real-life events or things he/she has seen on television. I have chosen to apply the rational choice theory to the popular movie Taken starring Liam Neeson and explain the many examples found throughout the movie.
All you ever hear about in the news lately is people getting in trouble for speech. Many Americans embrace freedom of speech for the same reasons they embrace other aspects of individualism. Freedom of speech is the right to defiantly, robustly and irreverently speak one's mind just because it is one's mind. Freedom of speech is thus bonded in special and unique ways to the human capacity to think, imagine and create. Conscience and consciousness are the sacred precincts of mind and soul. Freedom of speech is intimately linked to freedom of thought, to that central capacity to reason and wonder, hope and believe, that largely defines our humanity (Smolla).
Freedom is not a term with a simple definition or interpretation. While the basic understanding of freedom is for one to have certain rights and liberties as a citizen, the American notion and application of freedom have certainly changed since its very beginning as a nation. A crucial part of America’s history that challenged the idea of true “American freedom” for citizens was the Reconstruction Era. Although the Union troops were pulled out of the South and ended de jure segregation, the emergence of Jim Crow laws at the end of Reconstruction facilitated de facto segregation. Instead of completely achieving equal freedom, Reconstruction ultimately hindered African American’s freedom with the emergence of the black codes that resurfaced again
But being American is something that can be broken up into three big categories. One of them having our right and freedoms to do whatever we please, two having a democratic republic, third of all having people of different nationalities coming together. Our freedom in the United States is what makes us who we are. This defines us because we are protected by the Constitution and Bill
"The American is a new man, who acts upon new principles; he must entertain new ideas, and form new opinions." An American is someone who has the control to be able to make their own decisions and act upon what they want, and what they believe. The American in my opinion, is someone who has their rights, and follows laws but still has a freedom of choice.
Being an American is not a phrase that should be thrown around lightly. Ask the question of “what does it mean to be an American?” seventy-five years ago during a World War and someone will get a totally different answer than today, but the meaning behind the answers stays the same. Americans have the freedom to choose, or not to choose, just about every aspect of their life from religion, to government leadership, to education. This freedom of choice is something that is usually not recognized and often taken for granted.
What is Freedom of speech? Well, the definition for freedom of speech is the ability to speak freely without being subject to censorship or without fear of retaliation from a governing body. There are at least two documents, the US Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, that acknowledge that free speech is an unalienable right and protect it for all. There is another form of speech that may or may not be protected, depending on the circumstances, under the same documents and that is hate speech. Some of the limitations that are put in place by Government, employers, and educational facilities are a
According to one of rational choice theory’s prominent and more thoughtful contemporary exponents, Peter C. Ordeshook, “four books mark the beginning of modern political theory: Anthony Downs’s An Economic Theory of Democracy (1957), Duncan Black’s Theory of Committees and Elections (1958), William H. Riker’s A Theory of Political Coalitions (1962), and James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock’s The Calculus of Consent (1962). These volumes, along with Kenneth Arrow’s Social Choice and Individual Values (1951), began such a wealth of research that political scientists today have difficulty digesting and synthesizing all but small parts of it. Consequently, the full value of this research often goes
Rational choice theory, also known simply as choice theory, is the assessment of a potential offender to commit a crime. Choice theory is the belief that committing a crime is a rational decision, based on cost benefit analysis. The would-be offender will weigh the costs of committing a particular crime: fines, jail time, and imprisonment versus the benefits: money, status, heightened adrenaline. Depending on which factors out-weigh the other, a criminal will decide to commit or forgo committing a crime. This decision making process makes committing a crime a rational choice. This theory can be used to explain why an offender will decide to commit burglary, robbery, aggravated assault, or murder.