preview

Professor Kok Interview

Better Essays

An interview with Professor Kok was used as a foundation for the project and conformed to “preliminary research techniques” (Crosby, Diclemente and Salazar, 2006), practiced among professional health environments. This allowed the efficient planning of the overall Research Development. As the interview was a major primary source within the study, it was useful in supporting, contradicting and reinforcing ideas and concepts argued by various secondary sources. Professor Tuckweng Kok, who specialised in Clinical Virology, providing the investigative report with a professional and honest perspective of the prevalence of HIV. This credibility was reinforced, by the inclusion of specialist terminology in the interview, such as “nucleic acid sequences”, …show more content…

Prior to this, the books AIDS Sourcebook by Sarah Judd (2011) and The Persons with HIV/AIDs by Jerry Durham and Felissa Lashley (2000) were critically evaluated, in order to determine whether they would provide relevant information in answering the Research Question. However, whilst reading Durham and Lashley’s (2010) handbook, it was challenging to identify how the book’s content related directly to the research question. The content appeared to explain only palliative, as opposed to primary care diagnosis, treatment and prevention techniques, potentially degrading the relevance and currency of information within the research outcome, if used. Further advice from a specialist in virology, at the South Australian state Library, allowed the use of the handbook Diagnosis and Management of STDs (1996) by Gavin Hart, a substantially more appropriate source, with a credible author. Despite being premised on sexually transmitted disease, in general, the resource itself clearly distinguished and identified appropriate diagnosis techniques within “universal clinical settings” (Hart, 1996). This was demonstrated by the utilisation of bullet points, indented paragraphs, tables and diagrams: visual resources, which aided the extraction for use within the Research Outcome. Also, Hart’s style, was succinct; thus, signifying that the coherent communication of ideas was vital, for the investigative report and hence, holistically responding to the research question. Nevertheless, the handbook was a highly beneficial resource, complementing Sarah Judd’s AIDS Sourcebook, as highlighted

Get Access