Principles Of Donald Trump

Next I will be reflecting upon this year Republican and Democrat Party nominating conventions. Providing information on how the 2016 conventions is different than previous years, along with evidence of any similarities of the two. In addition, provide details of any surprising scenes that occurred. Lastly, information will be provided on the most interesting scenes that occurred in both of the conventions.

"As a result of these differing opinions, many individuals fear they may be denied entry to the country in the future. This is especially true during times of war, as the goverment did prohibit Chinese laborers from entering the country in the 1800s and also allow Japanese-Americans to be put into internment camps during World War II. As many are now saying America is in a war against Islamic extremists, this could lead to certain groups, such as Muslims, from being banned legally," Munsey

The Republican Convention was held in support to reelect Republican Candidates President Bush and Vice President Quayle. There was an extremely large audience in support of the Republican campaign. Reagan was overwhelmed by the amount of applause and cheering from the audience. In fact, balloons, posters, and flags were everywhere displaying the pride of the nation and the Republican Party. The

Within the first paragraph it says, “He had even vowed not only to “bomb the sh-t” of the Islamic State fighters in Syria but also to “Take out their families” – another likely war crime.” This would not sit well with some people, some people’s morale conscious would not want this to happen. Just after that it say, “he made his next move, an extraordinary call to bar all Muslims from entering the U.S, including tourists and business travelers, a direct challenge to the nation’s constitutional right to the free exercise of religion.” Banning a certain group from the United States because of their religion I like saying someone cannot come into your house because they are a different skin color, it is just

When interviewed, Rudy Giuliani explained how the administration’s immigration policy morphed from one that was obviously unconstitutional to one that is more subtly so. Host Jeanine Pirro asked, “Does the ban have anything to do with religion?” In response, Giuliani said, “When [Trump] first announced it, he said ‘Muslim ban.’ He called me up, he said, ‘Put a commission together, show me the right way to do it legally.’” “It,” in this case, of course, is a ban on Muslims.

There are many reforms that the two candidates have said they will do if they are elected president. The most important reform that I think they have talked about is about agriculture and what they will do it for it if they are elected. Trump has a committee that will help us understand and fix things for the communities of rural America. This committee that he has rounded together is going help solve issues of everyday lives of the rural communities. His administration is a pro - agriculture team. He said he will fight for the farmers and the ranchers that have had hardships and for the future hardships. Donald Trump's partner, Mike Pence is a big pro - agriculture for the midwest states. He will be very good at informing Trump on what there

Extreme vetting is the practice of extremely thorough investigation and background checking of a person before deciding their fate. Some argue that extreme vetting helps “to strengthen the social and political fabric of our country” and “to define the common set of values that distinguishes us as Americans” (Source D). Unfortunately, this is not all extreme vetting does. Mostafa Hassoun, a Syrian refugee who experienced vetting before it became “extreme”, states that the US and UN asked about “my family, my politics, my hobbies, my childhood, my opinions of the U.S., and even my love life” (Source E). This process would be reasonable if it wasn’t so thorough that it took an average of “18-24 months” (Source E). Source E also states that by the end of the process, Hassoun felt that “nobody in the world knows me better than the United States government”. A more extreme vetting process than this “non-extreme” practice would be unnecessary. The same order that calls for extreme vetting “suspends visas for the citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries” (Source E). This order is not meant to only “strengthen the social and political fabric of our country”. It is discrimination coming from distrust of Muslims as a whole on the part of the US government. This is a situation where, instead of being xenophobic, the US should practice xenia. Although the government would ideally let in all the strangers in need of help, as xenia states, it is unrealistic that they could be able to do this. However, this does not mean they have to turn away so many people. Instead, they should try to let in as many people as they can and to help to find safe living places for those who they are unable to take

2016 saw the Republican National Convention July 18-21 in Cleveland, Ohio and one week later July 25-28, the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, PA. These conventions both had the fanfare of National Conventions of old and the added benefit of an economic increase to the local business and tourism industries in each of the areas. The venue also brought continued animosity, a media frenzy, protests. and boycotts that escalated on the road to each convention, continued through to the election and persisted to fulminate following the inauguration.

Yesterday I read a news story, which was disturbing and left me in awe. The article was titled “Donald Trump: Ban All Muslims Entering US”, by Ed Pilkington was published in Guardian dated December 8, 2015(http://bit.ly/1OLTDLt). The story talks about Trumps comments about denying entry to Muslims into United States.

Thus, the question of the Trump administration’s antitrust philosophy does not have a simple answer. Analzying the three potential FTC chairmen, I think that the race is between Ohlhausen and Simons. Having chosen Joshua Wright as head of the FTC transition, a figure cited by the Wall Street Journal as the most conservative commissioner during his two and a half year tenure at the organization, Wright will recommend candidates to Trump for the open seats on the FTC. With two open Republican seats and one Democratic seat, Trump would be delivering the FTC to its first Republican majority since the Bush administration.

This is truly serious, folks. The arguments equating Trump with Clinton are spurious at best. Clinton is disliked, but a huge amount of that sentiment is based on feelings, conjecture, rumor, intuition, sexism, and conspiracy theories. Donald Trump is a demagogue by definition (a political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices rather than by using rational argument), who must not only be defeated but absolutely repudiated. Clinton is a highly qualified statesman whose policies are rational and pragmatic. Many of her positions are opposed by the right; that is appropriate (I am a Democrat who voted for Reagan for re-election), and it will create dialogue and compromise. There is no compromise with Trump, even

Our Convention occurs at a moment of crisis for our nation. The attacks on our police, and the terrorism in our cities, threaten our very way of life. Any politician who does not grasp this danger is not fit to lead our country.

Building divider surroundings of the house is great, however fabricating a divider between two countries isn't incredible way to deal with a safe country. The unlawful development has ended up being a standout amongst the most concerning issues in America, many trusts that an edge divider with Mexico would help the issue. Be that as it may, divider is a pointless activity and money since it doesn't help the circumstance. It is inefficient. The cost of the divider between Mexico joined states is over the top. Building the divider will be exorbitant and it is by all accounts wasteful and will influence the connection amongst U.S.A and Mexico. The U.S government has consumed through 2.4$ billions of dollars. It makes America's economy weak,

In contrast to the belief that all immigrants should be accepted as citizens in our country, we cannot carelessly let them enter our nation and roam about without any knowledge on who they are. In Bouie’s article, real estate mogul Donald Trump has a reasonable argument on Obama’s decisions saying “Refugees from Syria are now pouring into our great country. Who knows who they are—some could be ISIS. Is our president insane?” (Bouie). And in sense, Trump’s concern is necessary and that we should take precaution on the people who wish to enter our country. Even if the times and ideas and mindsets of modern Americans have changed; religion and cultural beliefs of some have not. And who are we to truly know if someone from Syria, or Iran, or Iraq, or any other foreign country wishes to come here to take the lives of many to server their own justice?

(Brown, 2016). The latest development is that the President of the United States has issued a travel ban on several countries that have a predominately Muslim population. The resulting cry from the left is that it is a “ban of Muslim’s” but have any of them asked if maybe we should actually take the time to vet the people who want to come to America?