FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Greenville, SC) Washburn Law Firm, PLLC launches a new Immigration Law website, designed to educate the public on issues related to immigration, as the firm understands this is a topic on the mind of many. The firm maintains offices in Asheville, North Carolina and Greenville, South Carolina to assist individuals with matters relating to immigration. As this topic continues to heat up, the website will be a great resource for individuals who have questions regarding moving to the United States.
"As the Denver Post recently reported, there is no way to know what the Supreme Court would do in the event Donald Trump became president and followed through on his statement that he would close the country's borders to all Muslims. As the president and Congress have both had wide discretion when it comes to this volatile topic, many are worried what an action of this
…show more content…
Never has the Supreme Court, the highest court in the land, struck down any immigration classification based on race or any other reason, as Peter Shapiro, an immigration expert at Temple University, explains. Other experts disagree, however, stating the court would never allow a president to ban a group based on religious reasons, as this would violate religious freedom provisions found in the constitution.
"As a result of these differing opinions, many individuals fear they may be denied entry to the country in the future. This is especially true during times of war, as the goverment did prohibit Chinese laborers from entering the country in the 1800s and also allow Japanese-Americans to be put into internment camps during World War II. As many are now saying America is in a war against Islamic extremists, this could lead to certain groups, such as Muslims, from being banned legally," Munsey
1. From the very beginnings of their presence in the country, Chinese people were regarded as dangerous foreigners who took jobs and opportunities away from hardworking Americans. The 1870s saw the formation of the Workingmen’s Party of California, whose motto was simply and succinctly “The Chinese Must Go!”The Chinese Exclusion Act is also similaer to what Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump proposed when he called for a "total and complete shutdown" of Muslims entering the United States. Since it was repealed in 1943, the Chinese Exclusion Act has been remembered as a dark period in American history, when Chinese immigration all but halted for several years. Trump’s ban on Muslims would be an even more extreme iteration of this
|If handled roughly the daphnia could get |The heart rate would be affected by the |Handle it carefully e.g use a pipette not |
The belief that every middle Easter is a terrorist simply because American associate their religious beliefs to be dangerous. It’s pretty clear that’s not entirely true but still even our president believe in this idea. At the Benning of Donald Trump presidency, the president declare that individuals from 8 country from the Middle East and Northern African were ban from entering the US. The Middle East and Northern African countries that are were mostly affected include Iran, Syria, Yemen and Libya. The whole idea behind this was to ensure the safety of the American citizen by stopping all individual from entering. I feel that this is unfair since the mass killings in the USA are being done by mostly white individuals or not by other minority groups. I sometime feel upset because, American war planes our dropping bomb in many of this people’s house and American simply justify it by saying that Americans are fighting terrorism but we know that we are doing for economical
Much like many white people in the South believed black protestors had no right to infiltrate their cities in the 1960s, a large number of Americans are against the idea of letting refugees or anyone that follows a strongly stereotyped religion into their country. However, like King says, “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (78). Over the course of history, the United States have established themselves as a major power with the intentions of helping others. Whether the tactics for this have actually been successful in the past is a different discussion, but if the motives are pure, then this country has a moral and ethical obligation to help those in need. In this case, that would mean allowing these refugees into the country and not continuing to stigmatize an entire group of people any further. This country turned away refugees during World War II, and a portion of them were killed in the Holocaust. The exact same thing could potentially happen if these refugees and muslims are banned from traveling into the United States.
In The New York Times’ article called “Trump’s Immigration Ban Is Illegal” published on January 27th, 2017, David J. Bier expresses his personal opinion about the execute order signed by Trump that supports to bar all permanent immigration from seven majority-Muslim countries. According to Bier, the order is illegal, since Congress outlawed all discrimination against immigrants and American citizens based on nationality, race, sex, place of birth, or place of residence by means of The Immigration and National Act of 1965. However, Bier explains that the 1965 law does not ban discrimination based on religion, which was Mr. Trump’s original proposal. The author uses examples to prove that presidents have used their powers many times to forbid
The horrific terrorist attack on the United States that took place on September 11, 2001 significantly changed the definition of freedom in America. This event resulted in an immediate call to action by the US government to protect and defend its citizens and country. The Department of Homeland Security was created to “coordinate efforts to improve security at home, and it imposed sever limits on the civil liberties of those suspected of a connection with terrorism and, more generally, on immigrants from the Middle East.” The country was left feeling vulnerable and suspicious of things they previously took for granted. Heightened security measures around travel were put in place. Americans were asked to report suspicious activity. Muslim people were and still are subject to prejudice because of their religion being linked to the terrorist group.
Sixty five years after it first became law, the act still remains a cornerstone of the United States foreign affairs. In the text, it states that “whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may… suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants.” This part of the law is what has caused much controversy today. President Trump argues his right to ban muslims using this section of the law. The law is now outdated and the people that living in the country agree the law is in desperate need of a new edition. The 2017 election is not the first time Americans have called out the law. In 1965, President Johnson signed an amendment to the law and was quoted saying “for over four decades, the immigration policy of the United States has been twisted and has been distorted by the harsh injustice of the national origins quota system.” Although he argued as much as he could, Johnson never saw a change in the amendment and although he signed a law eliminating the discriminatory imbalances, the door for people in need was still not wide open. The amendment still never specifically ruled the president unable to deny someone access as Mae Ngai, an immigration historian at Columbia University said, “it doesn’t matter what the reason is,” meaning that though the
Bush (2008), Supreme Court decision decided that foreigners, even those suspected of terrorist acts, are entitled to the same Constitutional rights as United States citizens are ("BOUMEDIENE v. BUSH."). So, if religious tests were included in the Constitution for the Founding Fathers fear of potentially establishing a church of state, we must discern whether a religious test on refugees would violate the establishment. The Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), established a three test precedent for evaluating what infringes upon the rights granted in the Establishment clause. “First, the statute must have a secular legislative purpose; second, its principal or primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion; finally, the statute must not foster ‘an excessive government entanglement with religion.’” ("Lemon v. Kurtzman."). A religious test determining the admittance procedure on immigrants and refugees, would not pass the Lemmon test, and would thus be in violation of the Constitution. For example, President Trump’s Travel Ban states that it will, “prioritize refugees’ claims made by individuals on the basis of religious persecution, provided that the religion of that individual is a minority religion in the individual’s country of nationality” (Exec.). Considering that none of the countries listed in Trump’s “Muslim Ban”, have not orchestrated any pernicious terroristic attacks, since 1975, the Executive Order has scant evidence to support these
This paper explores the career of an immigration lawyer. It goes through the different possibilities within the career, and the different opportunities to choose from. This paper examines the different areas in which an immigration lawyer can focus on; not only does it explore the options for a lawyer but also gives brief descriptions of the EOIR, USCIS, BIA, and ICE which are different areas of immigration in which an immigration lawyer has to work with or against to help whomever they are representing. The EOIR stands for Executive Office of Immigration review; USCIS is United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; BIA is Board of Immigration Appeals; and ICE is Immigrations and Customs Enforcements. It also briefly describes the necessary requirements for becoming a lawyer, and more information regarding the desired career. Along with information about the various possibilities within the career, it will also explain a brief outline of the history of immigration and how the career option came about.
Muslim Americans that live in the United States today, must be terrified. This ban shows that topic or situation is a slippery slope. What will happen
This article is about President Barack Obama being rejected trying to spare millions of undocumented immigrants from deportation and allow them to work legally in the United States.The Supreme court ruled 4 to 4which tied blocked president Obama's plan. Even though the were short handed due to the death of the 9th member Justice Antonin Scalia died in February. Court ruled had ruled this case deadlocked which challenged president Obama Immigration plan to stop as many as five million undocumented immigrants from being deported and allowed them to legally work in the United States. "Mr. Obama described the ruling as a deep disappointment for immigrants who would not be able to emerge from the threat of deportation for at least the balance
Since 9/11, Muslims and the people of Arab and South Asian descent became targets by the government practices that result in racial profiling. “In June 2002, the attorney general John Ashcroft made announced a “Special Registration” that was a must for all males from a list of Arab and Muslim countries report to the government to register and be fingerprinted. For instance, ever since they crash into the Twin Tower’s those people seem to be targets especially trying to get a job” (Graves, L. 2010, December 27). They also seem to be more of a target for questioning before they attempt to come back into the country. “The United States has been actively engaged in prosecuting the Global War on Terrorism since September 2001” Dobrot, L. (2007, November 1). “Through after 5 years of the national effort that has included the loss of over 3,000 service members in combat operations, a lot of people are questioning whether the U.S. strategy is working, and if the United States understand how to combat an enemy based on radical revolutionary religious ideology” (Dobrot, L. (2007, November
The President had a fight on his hands from federal courts when Judge Andrew S. Hanen of Texas, who is of Mexican heritage, issued a restraining order obstructing the President’s executive order concerning deportation. Mr. Obama’s order would give temporary resident standing to about four million illegal’s. Twenty-five Republican governors supported Judge Hanen’s decision that a federal agency cannot establish rules without Congress. Other court cases attempt to define what an illegal really is in terms of status. There are children of illegals born in the United States, there are people who have over stayed their work visas, families, and long terms residents who work hard, pay taxes, and follow the laws of the lad. No one wants to see families separated, children left in the United States without parents, etc. The list is long and everybody has their own story to tell. The definition of “illegal” is someone who is in a country that they are not a citizen of or were not born in. among other things. Judges shape public policy for years after they are no longer sitting on the Court. In conclusion, where you are for a path way to citizenship for illegal
There is currently debate about, if Muslims should be allowed into this country, specifically Muslims from Syria, Iran, Yemen, Libya, Somalia, Sudan,
Smoking marijuana can affect your brain and body by causing heart attacks, killing brain cells, and reducing sperm cells. Marijuana is one of the most dangerous drugs in the U.S. It is also one of the easiest drugs to get or obtain from someone. Marijuana refers to the dried leaves, flowers, stems, and seeds from the hemp plant, Cannabis Sativa. Marijuana has many nicknames like weed, pot, kush, loud, dank, and gas. Marijuana is mostly made out of THC also known as Tetrahydrocannabinol. Your health is also affected by the way marijuana is consumed.