preview

Post-Secondary Education In Mike Rose's Blue Collar Brilliance

Decent Essays

There you are, a teenage version of yourself. You’re most likely only seventeen or eighteen years old, but maybe you’re younger or maybe you’re older. Regardless of your age, you’ve clearly just had a serious discussion. The time has come for you to start making decisions about your life after high school. You know a lot about college. College is probably the only choice you’ve even considered. But do you really want to be in school for at least another two years? Is college even worth paying for? Why shouldn’t you just find a job and move on with your life? In this essay I will examine the valid opinions of other thinkers and attempt to provide a compelling argument about the importance of post-secondary education. Blue Collar Brilliance, an article by UCLA professor Mike Rose, implies that some vocational paths don’t require a post-secondary education. He shares the story of his mother, a waitress who dropped out of school in the seventh grade. “There isn’t a day that goes by in the restaurant that you don’t learn something.” Rose explains. He shows us that even though she didn’t even acquire a high school education, she wasn’t unintelligent or incapable of working. She didn’t require a post-secondary education to work at the restaurant or to support her family’s lifestyle. “…my mother learned to work smart.” Rose offers. It was essential for …show more content…

He implies that general education is not important for the students who know what they want to specialize in after college. Murray goes on the say that, “To be willing to spend many more hours writing papers and answers to exam questions about that material approaches masochism.” I believe that Charles Murray’s point is that a liberal education is a long and difficult process that we shouldn’t force people to

Get Access