PETA Advertising Rhetorical Analysis

In 2010 the ASPCA (The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) came out with a commercial that would shock the advertisement industry. The effectiveness of this commercial is proven, simply by watching the reactions of the commercial’s viewers. For those who have never seen the video it has a very sad and morose tone to it. The commercial begins with showing pictures and videos of suffering animals with the song “Angel” playing in the background. While this is going on the narrator of the commercial (Sarah McLachlen) is softly talking about the suffering and abuse that these unfortunate animals go through. Through many different rhetorical techniques the viewers are many times brought to tears after watching this

It shows the devastating consequences of being a lifetime smoker, in hopes to get them to quit. However, there is also a secondary audience: nonsmokers. The message of the dangers of smoking is sent to nonsmokers because it might just prevent them from starting up a bad habit. In addition, there is a mediated audience: youth. They use unique visual effects that are fun to watch, a talking camel, and colorful costumes and lights. They also say that “tobacco companies state that smoking makes you hip,” which is what most teenagers

This advertisement also uses major topics in today’s society to draw people in. In the first section of the commercial, it uses whale extinction and McCarthy trying to save them. Secondly, it uses deforestation and the efforts to save the trees as another environmental draw-in. In the third slot, it focuses on global warming and the melting ice caps. And lastly, the commercial uses the extinction of rhinos (K. 2017.). This establishes Ethos by showing that the company is aware of the problems in the world today. These environmental issues have been a problem for several years, and there are many people that are concerned for them. By using them to pull people in, they are opening their audience to not only people who like the outdoors, but also to people who want to be heroes.

Two of their most well-known examples of popular rhetoric are the use of television advertisements and their website. The first image seen in its commercials is an animal they are saving, so that the noticeable fixation on your screen is a mistreated puppy. Similarly, the ASPCA’s website organization, content, and layout are all formatted primarily to entice and encourage the public to donate money. Clearly, the ASPCA’s intended persuasive appeal is for whoever is watching or visiting the site to donate. After careful examination of both its television advertisements and website, one can see that the ASPCA knows how to rake in the cash by using guilt against its audience. The sole purpose of the organization’s commercials and website is to get its audience to support its cause through donations, not to educate you on animal abuse. Because the video makes such a strong emotional appeal, it more effectively targets people, especially women, who tend to be more susceptible to sentimental

Violence is everywhere in the United States of America. Many people in America and around the world have been a victim or know someone who has been a victim of violence. Over 22 million women in the United States have been raped in their lifetime according to the website, Victims of Crime. This number is significant. Advertisements could play a role in making violence more acceptable in our society. PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, is known for having shocking advertisements. This pro-vegan and pro-vegetarian nonprofit organization has always been a topic of interest. Many of PETA’s ad campaigns are related to sexuality, violence, discrimination against how people look, and dominance over women. There are many

The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is one of the most recognizable organizations within the animal rights movement, due in part to their attention grabbing antics and controversial advertisements. While PETA has been successful in creating visual rhetoric that generally appeals to the audience’s cognitive reasoning and emotions they are often not successful in catalyzing actual change in behaviour.

The ad, for "Creatures", shows an image of a moose eating grass. On top of the ad is the text “There’s plenty of room for all God’s creatures. Right next to the mashed potatoes”. On the bottom is the text “Saskatoon: STEAKS – FISH – WILD GAME”. The theme for this advertisement is: The meat is here, eat it. The purpose for this ad is to convince the audience to eat at the Saskatoon restaurant. The intended audience for the advertisement is hunters. The image of the moose eating the grass is something hunters know they want to be eating; they can better relate and analyze the reason for them choosing the image of the moose eating the grass. The image implies that the Saskatoon

Advertisers use a variety of appeals to convince the viewer’s to buy certain products or bring a topic to the awareness of the viewer. The anti-child abuse announcement that San Francisco Human Services Agency released is no different. A public service announcement is designed to publicize a problem the nation is facing. Advertisements can appeal to the audience through a variety of elements such as images and speech. In this advertisement pathos and ethos are represented through the sounds and visual content while logos is presented through the statistics given at the end of the advertisement. With this advertisement it is also important to consider the

An old saying that comes into play when just glancing at this advertisement, “An apple a day keeps the doctor away.” is an old saying pediatricians would say to their miniature patients. Who would know this could grab attention of people just watching TV? “An Apple a Day” illustrates four Granny Smith apples on one side of the ad while a slice of a Granny Smith apple sits on the other side of the ad. The product the advertiser is selling has more to offer than the other companies which, is shown by the whole apples and the slice of an apple. The small description underneath the Granny Smith apples has a formal, yet demanding tone that provides information about the product. In the fine print, it has some details on how their company is “one of the best. “Then below the small caption is a large, bold black logo followed by the contact information of the company all directed towards drivers. “An Apple a Day” is trying to connect with middle-class drivers looking for better quality insurance for an inexpensive price.

At a first glance of the ad that was chosen, you might not assume anything of it at first, but if you take a second glance at the ad then you’ll be able to convey the message. The ad tackles on the deep and never ending controversial topic about Racism from the use of babies. Within our society today, some might say that racism does not affect opportunities for certain races, but some would argue that it still exists.

My ad for an anti smoking campaign shows a picture of a baby smoking a cigarette as half the baby 's face is decaying. To the right of this image there is text that states," I smoke second hand." Right below that in smaller text is a warning that reads, "Warning: may kill your baby." After closely analyzing this image I found that the argument for this advertisement is: Smoking not only effects you but the people around you too. This ad is very effective due the fact that the distinctive feature of the argument convinces the audience that smoking is unhealthy even second hand smoke.

The commercial by ASPCA has one message, and that is to protect and better the condition of life for national, farm, and wild animals. ASPCA is a non-profit organization dedicated to preventing cruelty to animals. They have a mission, that is to rescue, save and help animals all around North America because there are way too many cases of animal cruelty and neglect. Sarah McLachlan makes an argument about animals being abused and neglected, and how we can change that by a mere donation. This argument persuades the audience with the small videos and pictures in the background showing sad, hurt, and neglected animals that need a home with owners who will love and take care of them.

The Peta Ad is ineffective because it is trying to convince the reader to turn vegan but he's not giving a valid reason why since he is using child abuse as an example and he doesnt know the real meaning of it. For example in the Peta Ad it states, " Parents who allow children to eat meat are guilty of child abuse." This shows that they don't know the real meaning of child abuse because when you are being abused you are not happy but the children are happy eating meat. Child abuse is when they are harrassing the children and doing things against their own will but in this case they are eating what they like. Giving children meat is not child abuse because you are giving them what they are asking for, it would be child abuse if you do not feed

Approximately twenty percent of adults in the United States smoke cigarettes, it is this habit which is the number one cause of death that is easily preventable. Anti-smoking advertisements are seen throughout our society, usually showing the harmful effects of tobacco through graphic pictures or other shocking images. The advertisement I chose is a black and white image, showing a young man smoking a cigarette, with the smoke from it forming a gun pointed at his head. Off to the side appear the words, “Kill a cigarette, save a life. Yours.” The advertisement makes use of the three rhetorical appeals of logos, ethos, and pathos through its image and implied meanings. Through this, the image is able to convey a strong sense of danger and bring awareness to the deadliness of smoking.

The PeTA ad is nit effective ad that drives the audience to eat less meat and go vegan. The ad reveals a child eating a hamburger that does not mean that their children are being abused. The children are being feed with what they need and that does not jutify that eating meat is abusive. The credibility of PeTA is not good because they deal with animal abuse and not how the children is put to