preview

Missouri Compromise Research Paper

Decent Essays

Slavery is the act of owning people and giving them nothing but restricted freedom and exhausting laborious jobs. Most of the slave states were in the South, including Texas, Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, Maryland, and Delaware. The free states were in the North including California, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin. It was determined if a state would own slaves or not through the Missouri Compromise, most of the slave states justified their need for slaves because or the amount of work that had to be done in …show more content…

The Missouri Compromise was criticized by many southerners because it established the principle that Congress could make laws regarding slavery; northerners, on the other hand, condemned it for acquiescing in the expansion of slavery. The Missouri ACt was later declared as unconstitutional in 1854 and Congress decided that they could not prohibit states in owning slaves ( http://www.history.com/topics/missouri-compromise) The Slave States used their factories and plantations as reasons for owning slaves. The plantation owners were very greedy and slaves were very cheap and did absolutely did all the work for them. It was nearly free labor and it increased your social status as well. The more slaves you owned, the wealthier you looked and the more likable and desirable you are to those around you. Slavery was the main cause of the Civil War. The economies of the North and the South were very different. The South relied heavily on the plantations, factories and slaves for their incomes while the north relied more on its ports and trading for their economy. When the north wanted to end slavery, the south saw it as the north destroying their

Get Access