Essay on The 1820 Missouri Compromise

1820 agreement crafted by Henry Clay. It was a settlement that allowed Missouri as a slave state and to balance it out Maine becomes a free state, banning slavery north of the 36°30’N latitude. The significance of the compromise is retaining the balance between slave and free states. The compromise solved the short-term crisis. But that crisis had exposed the growing division btwn the North and the South over the expansion of slavery.

In 1854 another problem arose which resulted in Congress passing the Kansas-Nebraska Act which repealed the Missouri Compromise, this act was introduced by Stephen A. Douglas a chairman of Committee on Territories, this act allowed the people of Kansas and Nebraska to choose rather they wanted slavery in their boundary or not through the power of popular sovereignty, the Pro-slavery settlers won the election but were charged with accusations that they cheated, in order to make sure that the vote was right they ordered a re-election but the Pro-slavery refused and the refusal resulted into a battle. John Brown an Anti-slavery leader who believed that he was sent here by god to kill anyone who was pro-slavery. He led the anti-slavery force which gained the nickname “Bleeding Kansas”. The fight was soon stopped, and a final election was held, this time the anti-slavery settlers won the vote and was announced that Kansas would become a free state in 1861. In conclusion the Compromises and Acts may have had their flaws but it they some how manage to solve the slavery issues.

Slavery was allowed for a long period of time because of this compromise and it was very horrible for the slaves in the South. In the South, they allowed slavery and the North did not allow it and soon later the civil war will start. The other consequence of the Missouri compromise was that it led to the Civil war. Even though it delayed the civil war, but it was one of the consequences of the Missouri compromise. The South fought for states rights to withdrawal from the union and the North fought for the union to preserve for the United States. The North did not want to South to withdrawal and still allow

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was intended to solve the issue of slavery and create peace within the union. However, as seen in the following documents, all the Missouri Compromise did was push the issue down the road. Document A, Andrew Jackson expresses great concern about the possible consequences of the Missouri Compromise. Jackson claims that the controversy on this issue will not only divide the nation but also encourage violence and uprisings. He accuses the Eastern interests of placing their own power and political ascent above the good of the nation as a whole and foreshadowing the growing hostility between different regions.

The Missouri Compromise is accounted for to have been passed in 1820 to keep up an adjust of energy in Congress between the slavery and bondage Free States. The law showed Missouri as a slave state and Maine a sans slave state. Moreover, the law consumed bondage in Louisiana region. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 canceled the law and after three years the Supreme Court controlled the Missouri trade off law as unlawful and the Congress had no expert at an opportunity to consume slavery in the domains.

The Missouri Compromise of 1820: The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was created by Henry Clay. This compromise would benefit both the Northern states and the Southern states. This compromise had occurred when the territory of Missouri wanted to become an official state. The only problem with this was that Missouri wanted to be a slave state.

The Missouri Compromise was just another deflection for America to ignore the topic of slavery. It was put in place to just balance the power in Senate. The admission of states would be in pairs like one slave state and one free. It wasn’t a solution for this boiling problem. With this debate it would decide which states had more power in the House either slave or free. This would eventually decide the type of laws passed either to go towards abolitionism or enforce stricter property

Missouri Compromise was a determined attempt made by Congress to remove the sectional and political competition that was caused by the request of Missouri in the late 1819 for admission as a state in which slavery would be legal. The United States controlled twenty-two states before Missouri was a state, the twenty-two states were evenly divided between slave and free. The state Missouri as a slave state would upset the balance. It would also set a model for congressional acceptance in the growth of slavery. In 1819, when Missouri was being arranged as America’s region, representative James Tallmadge of New York had presented an amendment that would end slavery there, Tallmadge’s effort was defeated. The Missouri state was still under debate

The Missouri Compromise was an act passed by Congress to ease, if not eliminate the tensions between North and South in terms of expanding slavery in the western territories. A line was drawn to indicate areas of freedom and/or slavery. This compromise created an equal balance of southern and free states in America. Peace was maintained for thirty-four years, until the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed. This act completely disregarded the Missouri Compromise as it allowed slavery based on popular sovereignty above the Missouri line.

The purpose of the Missouri Compromise was to try to keep Congress balanced with slave and free states. Two states were added: Missouri was a slave state and Maine was a free state. The Missouri Compromise also stated that the latitude line 36 30 was the line where slavery stopped.

In 1820, the Missouri Compromise was passed that admitted Missouri as a slave state. The main goal was to have the senate and House of Representatives have a balance between slave and free states. The significance of the Missouri Compromise was it helped delay the civil war by reducing the tension with the North and the South. By splitting the states, Missouri was considered as a slave state at granted more power for the Senate compared to the free states.

After working tirelessly to set forth his Compromise, Henry Clay’s Compromise finally became a law in 1850. Initially, the Compromise of 1850 slit up guidelines about slavery for the North and South. In the North, CA was a free state, the slave trade was prohibited in Wash. DC, and unrelated to slavery, TX lost their boundary conflict with NM. In the South, slaveholding was permitted in Wash. DC, and the creation of the Fugitive slave act. The fugitive slave act gave federal support to slave catchers. Although the N and S both benefitted from the compromise, the North technically gained more out of it. The Compromise of 1850 was significant because it gave the South the Fugitive slave law, and gave the North a new free state, CA—everybody wins!

In 1820, the Missouri Compromise was issued. This made it so that the states in the north were not allowed to have any slaves. If a slave ran to the north, they would be reclaimed and put back into slavery. Without this document the Civil War would’ve been less likely to happen. (Doc 1)

The Missouri Compromise was a temporary solution to the issue of slavery and territorial rights such as the movement West. Two areas of land wanted to become states in 1820, known as Maine and Missouri. Maine wanted to enter as a free state with no slavery as everyone in that area was against it and wanted it abolished. Missouri wanted to enter as a slave state and was all for slavery and wanted it to be spread all throughout the country. The compromise everyone came into conclusion with, was that there would be no slavery allowed north of 36° 30’ latitude. This angered the Southerners because their intention was to promote slavery not have it abolished. They realized that this compromise threatened the balance between free and slave states; Maine and Missouri. In order to expand slavery, the South felt that the United States would need territory from Mexico. The only area of land left was in Arkansas and that line became known as the Missouri Compromise line. The impact that the Missouri Compromise had on the United States was tremendous and had many effects on issues such as national politics, the institution of slavery, and the overall togetherness of the nation as a whole.

Henry Clay was the writer of The Missouri Compromise, he tried to limit the slavery boundaries, and it was later acknowledged as an unconstitutional and it’s also considered one of the several events that led to the American civil war. The compromise was an example for the settling from North and South differences over the slavery and duty issues and it also remained in result until rescinded by the Kansas-Nebraska act of 1854.The Missouri Compromise relieved pressures among the North and the South delaying the civil war The American Civil War. According to the history February