Mediated Political Realities

One of the greatest stigmas held towards Christians is that they are very judgemental. Many people believe that Christians are too quick to judge someone and never really bother to figure out what those people actually think and why they think a certain way on something. Sadly, this stigma that is linked to Christians will always be a part of the word Christian. So why is it that when people hear the word Christian, they automatically think “judgemental”? There are many reasons one of them being that while many Christians are more concerned about looking good in front of other Christians and non Christians. Through my personal experience of being raised in a Christian home and being required to attend church, it is very easy for me to agree

Today’s media (news) plays an enormous role in the lives of people in directing a specific perception of the world around them. Most often media conduct's a subconscious effect upon its spectators in which the upshots are deliberately or illdeliberatly towards a particular topic.

We are living in information age, where quick access to all types of information is a way of life. People around the relay on media, for information related to politics, culture, sports, technology, economy and various other factors. Although media is applauded for its role in transforming our life by providing relevant and accurate information, there is increasing exasperation about current media practices. Many people believe that current media practices are not aligned with the objective of providing correct information to public. In doing so, media portrays a picture that is favorable to its own objective and may contradict the reality; consequently these practices are termed

NPR: which is the National Public Radio is a secretly and openly subsidized non-benefit enrollment media association that serves as a national syndicator to a system of 900 open radio stations in the United States.

I believe the two most important amendments in the Bill of Rights is the first and second amendments. The reason the first amendment is important to the United States citizens is because it protects the freedom of speech, religion and the press of a citizen. Citizens are able to communicate, state their opinion without getting into any trouble. However, “There are some limits to this, though, such as libel, slander, obscenity and incitement to commit a crime.”. People are free to speak their minds as long as they do not give false information about any other citizen. Many citizens have different religions, no one can change a person's religion nor how they practice it. Everyone has a right to their own religion, citizens have the freedom of

Journalists contributed distributing of knowledge to consolidate and enrich our point view. Conversely, a new year a new presidential candidate, the Republican candidates debates have raised the level of the juvenile. Though the candidates have done a better job attacking each other on different media outlets such as Fox, Msnbc or CNN; when it comes to presidential politics are placed on the backburner; thus, the media focus on the candidate’s personalities. Who’s sacrilegious, unapologetic, hasty, courageous or shameless? Mainstream media have gradually emphasised with the economic rather for the network to inform their audience in regards to political aspect. As a result, this becomes headlines and they are meagrely repeated throughout the

manner, even if negative stories have to be reported. In this essay, the comparison of media

Media has become an integral part of the lives of both Americans and people all around the world. It has its influences on different aspects of a person’s aspect on life. Many political analysts have looked at the influence of media on elections, especially as the media has become more prominent in the world. With technology becoming more and more a n integral part of the daily life of a person, this subject will become that much more relevant. We live in a time where almost every person in the developing and developed world has consistent access to a television, and therefore has that constant exposure to media. Almost everywhere a person goes, they will be exposed to the media. There are several factors that have been examined to determine the exact role that the media holds in the outcome of elections. One theory on the subject is that the national media has a different role than local medias do when it comes to levels on influence on elections The other two theories that will be discussed are media bias and that the amount of exposure to media has an effect on the amount of influence. Another theory is that the existence of a correlation is a false perception. All of these theories will be analyzed in this paper, as well as others. Different studies and analysis have different explanations for the correlation between media influence and elections. The factors analyzed have been viewed to show different variations in the relationship between the two. The findings of

Ever since the invention of television, image and reputation became the real weapons of politics. Television has influenced everything since its invention in 1940 (Campbell). From product and movie ads, to news bulletins and important congressional hearings, television has changed the way how viewers look at the world; especially the way we vote. The very first televised debate was held on September 26, 1960 between “Tricky Dick” and JFK (Menand). The television allowed most of America to view the inner workings of deciding who would run the country next, instead of reading what happened in the last debate in Sunday’s paper or hearing it on the radio. Though some listened to Nixon and Kennedy go back and forth on the issues on that Monday night,

The relationship between the media and politics has been going on for a long time. According to Paul Starr's article `Political Networking' the relationship began

The mass media has become a big part of our society and its counterparts. In a time span of 50 years this medium has influenced society to an extent where it has created wonders. This immaculate tool can control almost every action we perform, from speaking to the actions that every human being performs in society. The mass media has brought upon a new era of idea's and changes in the world we live in. As we analysis media in depth we will find many aspects of media which overlap and some of the smallest factors and aspects of media, which create the biggest impact on society.

According to Neil Postman, we are in the decline of the Age of Typography and the ascendancy of the Age of Television which will redefine public discourse and public life as we know it (Postman 8). In a world-pervading of technology, factors such as education, religion, and politics have to adjust in order to better suit these changes, in this case, television and media. Although each of these factors is affected by the media, one example of a role in the media in the contemporary world is the use of television in order to manipulate as well as encourage political views with the use of images. Furthermore, the opinion of the public sphere is influenced more by the image, along with the appearance, of political figures rather than their ideologies.

Mass media plays an important role in the society by providing entertainment, information and acting as the government’s overseer. Several scholars have developed philosophies that help people understand how mass media fulfills its roles in the society. For example, Horkheimer and Adorno have constructed theories that explain the functions and impacts of mass media in the society across the globe (Mosco, 2008). The central theme in all mass communication models entails the meaning of media contents, which include the images and texts and their influence on the target audience. The perception of the target audience concerning the text and images in the media are what form the basis of these theories. This essay discusses two hypothetical frameworks: the political economy and cultural studies theories, including their similarities and differences, and how they help in understanding the relationship between the media and society.

The media influences how people experience social life. Media such as newspaper, television and film, are important sources of information, education and entertainment. It can be used to learn more about the world and the people in it. In this regard it can be said that the media represent, interpret and endorse aspects of social experience (O’Shaughnessy and Stadler, 2005). The media are also implicated in social regulation, or in other terms, the government of society. The media are implicated in government and politics in an obvious way because modern systems of democracy are conducted through the media. But the media have a bigger role to play in government by structuring how society is controlled and maintained.

When the White House felt a retraction was not enough because so much harm had already been done, the media got extremely upset with the White House, due to the pressure they were putting on the publication (52-53). Begala agrees with Hewitt that the media has a bias, but argues that it is a liberal bias. He cites the media's obsession with the Clinton and Monica Lewinsky scandal and how, "Even when Clinton was leaving office, he was hounded and pounded by the press" (199). He argues the news coverage was unfair, brutal and unethical in the way both Bill and Hillary Clinton were treated during the scandal (200). Begala also says Al Gore was treated very poorly by the press during the election, by being misquoted. Gore made major contributions during the early phases of the internet and made a comment on CNN saying he "took the initiative in creating the Internet." Begala argues this was blown out of proportion and more than a thousand articles have been written quoting Gore saying he said he "invented the internet" (202). The people's perception that certain publications are bias can have a negative affect on journalists as a whole. While the public demands that the press question politicians, Robinson says there is public discontent when bad news is reported due to the publics distrust in news and a "kill the messenger syndrome." At times, the public will assume all media is the same and when one publication is guilty of inaccurate or bias