In the case involving Marianne Stanley vs University of Southern California, Marianne Stanley signed a contact with University of southern California on July 30, 1989 to serve as the head coach of the women's basketball team for four years. Stanley's contract expiration date was June 30, 1993, Stanley's contact provided an annual base salary for 60,000 with a 6,000 housing allowance. Around April of 1993, Stanley and Michael Garrett who’s the athletic director, started negotiating on a new contract. However, the confirmation is in debate with regards to the statement made by the Stanley and Garrett. Stanley claims in her statements that she informed Garrett that she was entitled to be paid the same amount as George Raveling, who’s the head …show more content…
Garrett and Stanley made an agreement verbally, that Stanley would be paid the same earnings as Coach Raveling, but Garrett later argued that USC did not have the funding at that time. He then later offered Stanley a multi-year contract on April 27, 1993 with the following terms. In 1993-94 her salary would increase to 80,000 with 6,000 allowance for housing, the second year 1994-95 Salary of $90,000 with a $6,000 housing allowance, and 1995-96 Salary of $100,000 with a $6,000 housing allowance. Garrett sent a memorandum with the terms above, and he informed Stanley that he needs a response within a few days. However, according to Garrett, Stanley said the offer was an insult; Stanley propose a counter offer which included her total compensation with the annual rate of 96,000 used for the first 18 months and then increase that total of her compensation to match Raveling for the last 18 months. Garret rejected Stanley’s counter offer, and told her that she should be pleased with being the second highest paid women’s basketball coach in the PAC-10 …show more content…
Stanley had to prove that the jobs are substantially equal and not identical, also she claimed that the differences of jobs were because of pervious gender based decisions based on University of Southern California. In effect Stanley also claimed that the differences between the jobs resulted from the Universities history on treatment of male and female athletic teams. Stanley attempts to argue that it has be proven that the reason for different pay was because of other reasons that sex, but it was found to be insufficient which resulted in Stanley motion for summary judgement to be denied. On the other hand, Michael Garrett and The University of Southern California stated that both coaches share the same responsibilities throughout games and during the recruiting process. After stating that, they explained the differences about the jobs, Raveling received more media scrutiny, more revenue was generate out of the men’s team, and the team along with Raveling has more pressure to produce revenue. In the light of the differences, coach Raveling was more experienced than Stanley. Raveling coached the Olympic men’s team, he had many years in marketing as well as promotion experience, he’s one of the highest recruiter in the nation for basketball, and he come to USC already having thirty one
Devastated, Joe returns to his dorm room and finds a letter from the university, informing him that he no longer has his full ride scholarship and must begin paying for his own room and board. Not able to pay for the $15,000 a year to attend the University, and his parents also unable to pay, Joe drops out of school and becomes a male dancer at the day and night dance club. Now the same thing would happen if Joe simply decided to no longer play for U. of A. in order to concentrate on his studies. Where’s the problem in this? Well, according to the NCAA’s rules, no athlete may be a professional and receive payment while in college and playing college sports. But doesn’t that sound like employment to you? Wasn’t Joe just fired from his job of Basketball? Wasn’t that athletic scholarship his salary? Look at the quote at the beginning of this paragraph and marinate on that for a minute, meanwhile I’ll discuss the issue of professionalism in sports.
On 8/13/15, the department received a report on Mr. Gail Beaird and Mrs. Marilyn Beaird. The report stated the couple is married and living by themselves in their Cordova Home. They both require constant supervision and assistance, which is provided to them by Visiting Angels. Mr. Beaird had serious anger issues and reportedly has a long history of domestic violence.
On December 1, 2015, 65 year-old Loretta Macpherson arrived at the emergency room of St. Charles Health System, located in Bend, Oregon. Ms. Macpherson arrived to the emergency room complaining of anxiety. When interviewed about her medication history, Ms. Macpherson was unable to identify the medications which she had been prescribed after her recent hospitalization at St. Charles for brain surgery. After examination, the emergency room physician ordered fosphenytoin, an anti-seizure medication, to be administered via intravenous infusion to Ms. Macpherson. In error she received rocuronium, a paralytic drug, causing her to stop breathing and suffer a cardiopulmonary arrest. Ms. Macpherson suffered irreversible brain damage and was placed
HHA was assigne to the patient Slaninka Marilyn since 03/05/17 for live-in service. Patient is weelchair bonded.
On May 14, Jerry and his mother wanted to learn Marlene’s fate. When Jerry and his mother arrived and found the court already in session, they sat in the back row. “Is there any victim impact statement?” Judge Hunter asked. “No, your Honor,” Michelle said.
Quite often, there are scenarios or cases that are controversial and make it hard for one to discern the appropriate legal action or jurisdiction that ought to be taken. Resultantly, it has been hard for people to discern the right way they are supposed to seek justice or protect themselves when they face social issues. Quite often, most people result in engaging in uninformed decisions resulting from the social adverse issues that affect their lives. A perfect example is that of family violence or intimate partner abuse scenarios where most people often suffer the wrath of harsh treatments from spouses. In the context of Marcia Norman and Mitchell, a similar case prevails.
Executive Realty Services, Joannie Williams is an established resource for an experienced Realtor in the Las Vegas area. whether you're looking to sell your current home or wanting to purchase a new property, we have the skills and expertise to help you achieve your goals. We stay up to date on current industry markets so that we can offer knowledgeable recommendations for our clients to help them make informed decisions.
On 10/21/2017 at about 0120 hours, I was dispatched to Mountain View Hospital located at 3100 North Tenaya Way in reference to a Attempted Robbery report.
John Wooden’s first year as a coach at UCLA was not your average persona. A regular day for Coach Wooden during his first year as UCLA’s basketball coach, was every morning at six a.m. until noon spend time at a local diary to make money. Afterwards, he was a dispatcher of trucks and was a troubleshooter. When all the trucks made all their deliveries, he would call in the next day’s orders, sweep the place and head over to UCLA. Once he got to UCLA, him and his assistant would mop the gymnasium floor to get it ready for the afternoon’s practice.
college level, the hiring of coaches is a key responsibility for athletic directors that can be subject
Karen Johnston is a director of a health planning agency which employs approximately 18 staff members and also serves on the Community Advisory Board (CAB). This program typically incorporates two student interns from her health planning agency. The CAB is a vital program as it advises the program faculty on issues that concern curriculum, internships, job placements, and scholarships.
College athletics is a very diverse organization involving a lot of students, mainly as the players, and non-students such as officials, coaches and others. The leading governing body for college athletics is the National Collegiate Athletic Association, NCAA. College sports is itself a big industry involving sponsorships, TV networks, endorsements, retail products and marketing. But in spite of it being a big business, the players are not compensated for the work they deliver. This opens up two opinions: should players be paid, or should they not? Kristi Dosh’s article, “The Problems With Paying College Athletes”, (UNCLEAR)discusses where the coaches’ money come from to pay student athletes. On the other hand, Mark Cassell’s article, “College Athletes Should Be Able To Negotiate Compensation”, debates how athletes should be able to negotiate their compensation. This paper will evaluate the evidence of both Dosh and Cassell in order to determine which argument is more effective.
On March 14th 2018, at 16:00 hours I witnessed on the CVV camera #72, that employee #10070 Janet Smith had fallen from a ladder at the Eaton store campus and crashed and fell onto the glass coffee table below her. I saw that she had fallen off the ladder while over reaching to hang a display sign. Once I got to the scene of the accident, I noticed Janet Smith holding onto her left wrist and was covered in blood noticeably in the face, forehead and left abdomen. Her co-worker Janice Kaschuk had witnessed the accident and rushed over and was helping Ms. Smith. I proceeded to get Ms. Smith situated and noticed how bad her fall was and called the ambulance at 16.20 hours. While I was waiting for the ambulance to arrive, I administered first aid
In the novel, The Scarlet Letter, Hawthorne characterizes Pearl with contrasting personalities and roles she plays in Hester’s life. Pearl’s conflicting personality components, innocence and defiance, both derive from her isolation from society, which transpired because of her mother’s sin. Pearl represents the conflict between everything good and dark, which reflects in the role she plays in Hester’s life, as the physical embodiment of the A. While Pearl serves as a savior to Hester, representing possible redemption, she is also Hester’s tormentor, a constant reminder of her sin, and the consequences of disobeying her Puritan nature and religion. Hawthorne’s intent is established in the novel through Pearl’s attachment to the A, the mirror
In this example, Sophie is faced with the challenge of how to properly report her expenses while on her first sales trip with her new company. Emma, Sophie's mentor, and senior sale person, tells her that the company policy for filling out expense vouchers is to leave off any gratuity that the sales person pays when on a trip. The reality is that it is expected for sales people, and even encouraged by their manager, to pad their reports to calculate for the gratuity. Emma tells Sophie that when a sale person did not conform to this method of padding her expense report, she and all the other sales people from that trip were investigated. Ultimately, that sales person was either fired or quite, while the rest of the group received little to no repercussions.