Leadership Styles Outlined By Morbert Summary

Factors that can influence an individual’s choice of leadership in any given situation are many and varied. An individual is likely to have a primary leadership style which they are most comfortable with using. Often the primary leadership style is that which most suits their innate personality traits. For example,

In today’s society, medical professionals are often faced with difficult ethical decisions that can permanently alter the life of their patients. The difficulty in these decisions lie in them being considered moral or immoral and what is the truly right choice. Most medical professionals attempt to make choices that will benefit their patient the most, but some disagree with the best course of treatment based on personal morals. Physicians have the ability and right to refuse treatment for a patient based on personal, moral, or religious values and in recent years, that right has been extended to pharmacists. Some issues have risen concerning pharmacists exercising this right when refusing to provide emergency contraceptives, such as Plan B, to patients.

There are four main leadership styles, the first being Autocratic style which the manager retains as much control and decision making authority as possible, the manager does not give employees any input or consultation. The next is Bureaucratic which is where the manager manages ‘by the book’ which is where everything must be completed according to procedure and protocol. Mangers using this style will only consult with those above them in the chain of command. They simple enforce the rules of the workplace. The next style of leadership is Laissez-Faire which is also known as the ‘hands off’ approach to management. The manager usually provides little or no direction and give employees as much freedom as possible. All power is given to employees and they are to dictate their own work ethics. The last leadership style is the Democratic style which is also known as the participative style and this is where employees are encouraged to be a part of the decision making process. The democratic manager keeps their employees informed about everything that affects

Healthcare professionals are faced with a multitude of ethical and legal conundrums. Since the introduction of birth control in American history, healthcare professionals have been put in situations to either follow their own moral and ethical beliefs, or choose to follow the law and give healthcare services to those who seek it. A large constituent to the disapproval of contraceptives other than natural family planning, is health professional’s religious beliefs. In addition, Adolescent females who need contraceptives are less likely to seek access to health care providers for these contraceptives in fear of personal information due to their age being released. Through the research provided, cases of pharmacist denial of prescribed or over the counter contraceptives to women have been the majority of conflict in this nation and in others.

Leaders are some of the most influential individuals in any society. They have the ability to influence those around them with various leadership styles including coercive, authoritative, affiliative, democratic, pacesetting, and coaching. Effective leaders consistently adapt to the environment around them to either enhance or correct any situation facing them. Within these leadership styles the most effective style has been considered that of the authoritative style. This style brings individuals together, builds self-confidence, and easily adapts to the environment around it.

Lawmakers at the state and federal rank have replied with an infinite number of proposals created to protect users. These proposals have been addressing the related questions of whether pharmacists should be allowed to refuse to fill valid prescriptions on moral or religious grounds, and, if so, what obligation the pharmacy has to the public when its pharmacist refuses. Lawmakers focusing on the pharmacists’ role and addressing the pharmacy’s responsibility to users only when a pharmacist refuses to fill prescriptions fails to address a related but distinct problem that women may come across: pharmacies that, as a matter of policy, refuse to sell emergency contraception, even when they sell ordinary birth control pills. According to the article there has been a rising number of pharmacists refusing to dispense

Comparing my participative style of leadership with autocratic leadership style and delegative (laissez faire) leadership style, there are several differences to evaluate. The autocratic leadership style is in contrast to my participative style of leadership even though they both ensure that tasks are accomplished. Autocratic leaders always want to hold power and be recognized by their members that they are in control by retaining most of the authority. They confidently make decisions, and are not concerned or worried with group members’ reaction towards decisions. The autocratic style of leadership is task oriented because the leader ensures that heavy emphases are placed on accomplishing task on time. The autocratic leaders tell the members what to do, controlling, bossy, they are assertive or self-assured, and want to remain as role model for members of the group. They can also cause members to feel bullied, unlike my participative leadership style which relies largely on members towards decision making through consultation, consensus, and democracy to accomplish tasks.

Question 1: The three types of group leadership styles are the Authoritarian, Democratic, and Liassez-Faire. The advantages of the Authoritarian leadership style are having more structure in a group settings and allowing the leader to have more control of the direction of the group. However, there are disadvantages of the leadership style, such as not allowing the members to freely interact among another. Additionally, the leadership style can intimidate members from continuing to attend group meetings. On the contrary, several cultures might be more comfortable with the leadership style.

One reason for this refusal is the result of women using contraceptives (Herbe 314). Contraceptives are a possible way to force the extinguishing of a human life inside of a woman. This is a main factor of why the dispense of these prescriptions is unethical for pharmacists. There is also the deprivation of pharmacists’ free will, this gives them no choice of whether to refuse or not, this topic of free will was explored by Herbe, he introduced it in The Journal of Law and Health stating “The free will to reject a movement or disagree with a practice is the sort of liberty this Nation was founded upon. . .many in the pharmaceutical profession will be forced into behaviors repugnant to their basic standards of goodness and morality” (Herbe 313). Herbe’s statements not only use the facts of the present, but also include facts from the past involving our liberty. This gives strong arguments on why pharmacists should have this right. The issue only develops as pharmacists begin to believe there is no protection of their self-identity. They deserve this protection because their beliefs matter deeply to them (McLean Par 7). This makes these pharmacists sound selfish, but they are not, they are supporting their moral beliefs and values. It is especially not thought of as selfish when they are forced to help with an act they do not believe to be ethically right. These causes may have risky effects for pharmacists if they choose to act on

In recent years there has been an influx of women receiving prescriptions for the postcoital pill (PCP) also known as the morning-after pill, Plan B, and a form of emergency contraception. Some pharmacists, however, are exercising their right not to fulfill patient’s prescription, based primarily on their personal values and morals. Amidst the negative overtones, women continue to take the morning-after pill in an effort to maintain their rights.

An effective leader influences their employees in a desired manner to achieve goals and objectives. Different leadership styles can affect an organization’s effectiveness and performance. The objective of this paper is to analyze the review of literature on various leadership styles over the past years and how effective and ineffective different leadership styles are in the workplace.

The styles today are less authoritative and more on trying to get feedback from co-workers. This change is driven by today’s individuals that want to be treated with respect and empowered to be self-driven. Today’s business environment requires managers to constantly evaluate his or her leadership style to maintain the so called competitive edge. Leadership moves through many power roles and how power vs. soft power that relates to managers as they manage people. The types of leaders are described with characteristics, as it relates to each individual. The characteristics styles that leaders show

In 1939, a group of researchers led by psychologist Kurt Lewin set out to name different styles of leadership. While further research shows additional types of leadership styles, this early study was very powerful and created three major leadership styles; Participative Leadership (Democratic), Authoritarian Leadership (Autocratic), and Delegative (Laissez-Faire) Leadership. After learning the

Two leadership styles on the opposite ends of the spectrum from one another are autocratic and participative. Both can be useful depending on the setting and what is required. Autocratic leaders make decisions without using team members, even if it would be useful (mindtools.com, n.d.). When a decision needs to be made very quickly, when there is not a need for additional input, or when a team agreement is not needed, this type of leadership can work (mindtools.com, n.d.). However, autocratic leadership can be demoralizing in the workplace and can lead to a high turnover rate as well as abseentism (mindtools.com, n.d.). An example of an autocratic leader/organization would be Martha Stewart and her company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia.

Those who are against the expanded role of a pharmacist claim that these professionals have no right to interfere in the decisions made between a physician and his or her patient and that pharmacists have gone too far in exercising their power of refusal. Cynthia Dailard of the Guttmacher Report on Public Policy 8, states in this article that pharmacists have the power to refuse birth control pills on moral or religious grounds which, for example, might lead to the struggle of many women not ready to be a mother. According to Julie Cantor and Ken Baum of The Limits of Conscientious Objection “in a profession that is bound by fiduciary obligation…it is unacceptable to leave patients by their own standards to fend for themselves.” Thus a medical professional should not judge a patient because they do not know there history and using that as a basis for objection is