“Know Why You Believe” is a linear case for God, His identity, His revelation, and His uniqueness. It is simple yet highly logical in regard to proving Christianity.
Chapter one deals with the rationality of Christianity. Many think that being religious involves abandoning all thinking and simply believe in some sort of invisible force. Even more ridiculous is the thought of dissecting a religion and proving it to be truth not fancy. But our faith is the only faith that can survive being under the microscope.
Chapter two tackles the age old question of God’s existence. Is there a God and what does that entail? The first proof for a higher power is the anthropological proof; all people from all over the planet have a deep rooted and historical
…show more content…
There is simply too much proof from recent findings such as the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Moabite Stone to doubt the Bible as a fairy tale that was made up. Discoveries such as these and countless more validate the Bible as a book that is at least a historical book.
Our Bible can be proven as a historical book but what about a book full of the supernatural? This is the basis for chapter eight. At first glance, the mere thought of a miracle is foolish. However, if one believes in a God who isn’t of created matter then miracles suddenly become highly probable. Why can’t a God who is above creation do that which is outside of natural law?
If the Bible can be proven logically, historically, and evidence is given in support for the supernatural is it possible for the Bible and science to agree? This is the base for chapter nine. Science and religion were cohabitating until the nineteenth century when evolution was widely accepted. Now they seem to be mortal enemies but is that the way it should be? Science in fact uses faith just as religion does. We know that truth is absolute and knowable, our universe is orderly and researchable, and we can trust our
…show more content…
This is a very popular topic in today’s world especially to those who attempt to discredit God. The answer is in short “sin has not yet been fully destroyed in our world and God gives us a sort of free will”. The Bible relates the evil of sin and its effect on creation. It also gives us the impression of the ability of man to make choices and God in His sovereignty allows this.
Chapter eleven focuses on the differences between Christianity and other religions. It also compares and contrasts the major world faiths.
The final chapter is the culmination of a single argument; if all of the previous facts are true then is the Christian experience valid? Quite simply, yes it is. No other faith is capable of changing so many lives than Christianity!
Personal Reflection
This book is very good mainly because it is both a linear logical argument for the case of Christianity. I have enjoyed the various arguments that are proved throughout the book. It is simple and concise yet it is advanced enough to use in
Across the world there are a surplus of beliefs and systems regarding Gods and religions. There are hundreds and thousands of theologians that claim they have the “truth” about the world and human creation. Although some of these claims may have truth wrapped in them, often times they are covered with fabrication, simply desiring to please the listener and offer the most beneficial reasoning for accepting it. I understand why someone with no religious upbringing or background would not quite know where to start when taking a look at Christianity; however, I’m here to help you understand the amazing aspects of Christianity. These aspects have caused over two billion people around the world to dedicate their lives and ways to follow the center of the religion- God.
1. If a scientist were to assemble a living thing from nonliving parts, it would not disprove the Bible because the Bible doesn’t tell us that humans will not be able to put together a living thing, only that life is the creation of God.
Argument of Gould’s Nonoverlapping Magisteria The relationship of science and religion has a long and troubled past that a multitude of theologians, philosophers and scientists have attempted to explain the correlation between the two realms. Stephen Jay Gould explains science as the “empirical constitution” and religion on the other hand is primarily concerned with ethics and spiritual value. Gould states that the lack of conflict is due to the fact that they are incommensurable. This strict independence of each other is not entirely true.
This will be based on the chapter 4 Religion as "Truth-Claims", posted on Blackboard. First of all, Dianne L. Oliver makes a preface about her writings saying that religions claim to get the truth, and followers of diverse religions say that their truth is the only one true, and cannot be compare with any other. Also, she remarks that many of those religion followers use violence to uphold their own version of truth. Moreover, she let us know that she is going to consider the "True-Claims" of different religions, and show how those claims can influence the practices, behaviors, and ideas of religion followers. Next to the introduction, she considers that religion is very essential for understanding the fundamental questions in our daily lives.
The Narrow Line of Belief Godliness, as well as the doctrine of one’s faith, is always a mystery. Many believe that man comes nearer to God through their piety and doubt given towards Him. From this rests faithful talk. One’s faith and doubt leads to humanity asking for answers. Yet, sometimes one’s faith may not reveal the true answers, moreover, recognize answers relinquished to them.
Christianity is a faith based religious tradition, of which the follower is considered to be a Christian adherent. Thus, being a living tradition, Christianity is continually subject to change in accordance to the needs of the adherent and reaffirming the Christian tradition within a contemporary context. The aspects, which attribute the present existence of Christianity and its dynamism therein, include sacred texts and writings, ritual and ceremonies, beliefs and believers, and ethics. Ultimately, the aforementioned characteristics strive to form and continually validate answers to the enduring questions of life through a process of change, which simultaneously highlights Christianity as a living tradition.
Theological Turning Points is written by Donald K. McKim. This work focuses on the major theological issues that Christianity has faced for centuries. These theological issues often go through several turning points that help resolve their problems. After reading through this book, I found myself learning new information that has helped clear any misunderstandings that I had towards Christianity. I have a better understanding of the Christology of who Jesus was, the sacrament of Baptism, and the Eschatology of what the Kingdom of God is.
The book Mere Christianity was derived from a series of radio talks by C.S. Lewis during World War two. The book is divided into four other small books each one providing one of the overall tenants of Christianity within its chapters.
“The Roaring 20’s” is a common name used for the 1920’s era because there was much success around the nation, subsequent to World War 1. F. Scott Fitzgerald writes “The Great Gatsby” with it’s setting dating back to the 1920’s. In this novel, Fitzgerald writes about the baffling main character known as Jay Gatsby and other complex symbols throughout the novel. Followed by this novel were many films, one being “The Great Gatsby” (2013) successfully directed by Baz Luhrmann. The novel and the book both share similarities, yet have some differences between the parties, characters, and the symbols.
When comparing science and religion there has been a great rift. As long as humanity has believed in a creator there as always been thinkers trying to quantify and evaluate the truth behind religion, trying to disprove or prove a supernatural force.
Although many cannot articulate their reasons for believing in the existence of God, their faith is nonetheless definite
The Book of John, and the life and death of Jesus Christ are key components of the authors evidence to back up his ways of solving the issues of Christian worldviews. Along with this, the author includes testimonials of his friends that specifically dealt with real-life issues in conflict with their Christian views as well.
Both Philosophers Aristotle and Plato have very different perspectives according to their metaphysics. Plato explains his metaphysics through the story of the allegory of the cave which conveys his story of the Divided Line, while on the other hand Aristotle explains his metaphysics through his idea of actuality versus potentiality which leds him to the discussion of substance. Plato explains his metaphysics in a sense where he mainly discusses the idea of knowledge and truth through ideas, while Aristotle on the other hand explains his metaphysics in a real life sense offering the stronger system for being able to break down his belief in great detail applying it to the real world, which can stem out to being applied to everything.
Finally, the third section will dwell on the controversial topic of faith, and human’s need for belief. Religion has done an excellent job in manipulating human’s need for trust. Therefore, the combination of these three sections should compel the reader to better understand why such a false belief, such as religion has had such success throughout history.
What is faith? Faith is something different to everyone. If you asked a hundred different people, it is possible that you would get many diverse answers. Religious faith and non-religious faith are two very distinct terms. Faith holds an extremely complex meaning when discussing it in the context of religion. Faith is a belief. That holds true to every religious and non-religious person. Every faith involves a decision. It is not about what we claim to believe, but what we actually do believe, that is true faith. Throughout this paper, I am going to discuss Christian faith, how it pertains to daily life and Christianity as a whole. I also intend to delve into George W. Forell's discussion of Christian faith and analyze and