Essay on Why God Doesn't Exist: An Atheist's Argument

Austrian-British philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein once said, “The real question of life after death isn 't whether or not it exists, but even if it does what problem this really solves.” The idea that death is inevitable is well known by everyone, yet no one is certain as to what happens afterwards. Even though the subject of life after death has been argued for centuries by many philosophers and theologians. In the article Sign Here If You Exist, Jill Sisson Quinn adequately employs figurative language, rhetoric questionings, and personal anecdotes to demonstrate a controversial argument on the topic of life after death.

Most of the human ‘Homo sapiens’ is born into a religion. That religion could be Muslim, Hindu, Jewish, Christian or Atheism, etc, a set of beliefs which someone inherits from his family, and till the death, that man will likely stay with his or her religion because almost every human has tendency to be religious. On the other hand, the reality of the religion does not matter to him unless someone conducts any investigation to get to the religious truth. In the essay ‘Homo religiosus,’ Karen Armstrong says that, today’s religious followers accept the religion into which they were born, without doing the hard work required. This means that someone follows his ancestor’s religion from the beginning for his life and he or she is not able to prove his ancestors were wrong because he or she has faith in his own religion. Faith is the main concept of the religion because people have deep faith in their own religion. In addition, faith is nothing but mere fantasy and faith has no basis in reality. Therefore, people have no ability to conduct investigations to find out the religious truth. In addition, elements and places of religion vary from religion to religion. Religion is one of the most prehistoric institutions which have been noticed to practice in any society past and present even in the ancient world where cave paintings were popular. Institutions, like politics and entertainments, have been greatly influenced by the religious faith. The truth of religion might give

Meaning and significance of death in the light of the Christian narrative is addressed including adequate detail.

1. The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God is based on the principle of cause and effect. What this basically means is that the universe was the effect of a cause, which was God. One of the oldest and most well known advocates of the Cosmological Argument was Thomas Aquinas who outlines his argument for the existence of God in his article entitled The Five Ways. The first way in his argument is deals with motion. Aquinas says that in order for something to be in motion something had to move it because it is impossible for something to move without the presence of some sort of outside force upon it. Therefore the world around us, nature, and our very existence could not have been put into motion without the influence of the

In Why People Believe Weird Things, Michael Shermer’s ultimate goal is to explain, in great detail, to his readers his opinion of certain topics. The book is a collection of sections about different subjects that are controversial in the minds of many people today, and in the past. In each section, Shermer presents the arguments of the believers, and presents his own opposing view. Along with just his own opinions and support, he also includes the facts and opinions of many other well known opposers as well. While he may be aiming to disprove a certain subject, Shermer does so with delicacy, and remains civil for most of his arguments. The topics of the arguments range from alien abductions and ghosts to the very delicate topics of the Holocaust and religion. Along with trying to explain to his readers the truths and fallacies of his topics, unavoidably, he is also trying to persuade his readers into believing as he does, from an arguably more enlightened and educated point of view.

In his book Future of an Illusion, Sigmund Freud utilizes his method of psychoanalysis on religion by comparing the relationship between human and religion to that of a child and his parents. Freud effectively demonstrates that religion is a product of the human mind. After exposing religion as a an illusion, Freud concludes that humanity will be better off when it has forgone religion. This paper will argue that Freud's assertion that religion is an illusion is correct because of it's blatantly traceable evolution through the history of the human civilization and psyche.

Many different religions around the world see the importance in life after death but these beliefs do vary a lot and each religion will believe completely different things. Two core religions in this essay that will be looked into are Islamic and Catholic. What do they believe will happen when someone dies? Is there another life after they die? Heaven? Hell? Or Paradise? Through this you will the importance in the belief of life after death, and the practices, rituals, and prayers that provide evidence and physical proof of how they show this belief. Then to go onto to discuss the wider implications holding onto these beliefs can have.

The arguments trying to “prove” the existence of God are by far some of the most controversial philosophical arguments out there. When some of the people who created these philosophies it was illegal or even punishable by death to even question his existence, let alone try to come up with a logical explanation to “prove” he is real. The two main arguments used today are the ontological argument and the cosmological argument. Neither one of these arguments are correct nor incorrect; moreover, the argument of God is extremely controversial and will continue on long after our lifetimes.

The question that motivates the article would be why do religious actors believe in the doctrines that comprise the religious system of their culture? In order to answer the question the author looks at how the psychological processes of cognitive, affective and motivational underline any type of complex behavior. Religious systems serve as cognitive systems, continuing to exist because of the powerful motivational dispositions and affective needs of the social actors to which they are responsive. The main argument for the reading would be in order to explain why social actors believe in their doctrines of their culture, we must examine the motivational and affective, as well as the cognitive properties of the mind, while still being concerned

Religion Explained has a bold title for a bold claim. Pascal Boyer believes he has solved why religion is what it is, and why it came into existence. He faces challenges by leaving gaps in his argument. Rituals and belief are left unexplainable, leaving room for the criticism of an insider v. outsider situation. Yet, even with these gaps, he states that religion is simply a byproduct of mental inference system. In the first paper, I proposed how I believe one should classify what religion is, and in this essay, I will break down and examine Boyer’s claims as it relates to religious theory and describing v. explaining – in order to further understand my suggestion and see if his scientific theories have changed my ideas at all.

Religions are said to hold answers for all of the important questions posed to the human race. One question that appears, not only in today’s time, but as far back as the dawn of man, is the curious question of ‘what happens after death?’ Some religions state that the soul can ascend to a heavenly body and eternal paradise, or descend to a fiery pit and eternal damnation. Some say

First, we must contemplate on the full extent and origin of religious desire and religious experience. From the very beginning of time, man have been extraordinarily religious. Proof of that extensive belief of religion is man’s creation of other deity’s such as gods and goddesses, who are in form of animals and women. Man has an unquenchable thirst to fully understand and to be able to walk in the light of the divine which is why they create these deity’s that they can touch and “communicate with”.

Perhaps the most important question in life someone can ask there self’s is, whether or not god exists. From the video “Does god exist” Quentin Smith, a graduate of Western Michigan University says, “All the galaxies were once compacted together, and the big bang theory is when all the matter in the galaxies just blew apart. And the mystery, according to science laws, is there can be no cause of this initial explosion.” Although there can be countless allegations someone can make to refute this known fact, I believe, through my experiences, that this is true. Thus, leading me to believe there is an unimaginable force that contains space that must have been able to expand our universe into what we see today. “God is at liberty to create, whatever state of the

In this essay we will discuss the importance of religion in society. We will attempt to explain why societies have religions and what functions their belief system has for them. We will also ask if these functions are now out-dated and if religions have any meaningful function in today's world or are they just stained glass windows into a bygone era? 'Religion' can be defined by two main groupings. 'The inclusive definition' covers all topics and subjects of a persons life including, not only, their belief in a deity but also their belief and belongingness to music, sport and any other interests the person may hold. 'The exclusive definition' refers to just their belief system regarding a 'supra-human' (Browne 2005, p. 311). It is mainly

The belief in religion is a shared trait among much of humanity’s existence. Since the inception of religion, humans have debated and even waged wars over which of their faith’s to be true throughout history. Religion had been often used to explicate natural processes which, at the time, were unexplainable to humans, and to establish moral boundaries for followers to abide by, as well as unifying people under one common belief. With the progression of science and philosophy, though, a new side of the debate has arisen recently—the questioning a god’s conceptual coherence, thus if religion in general is true.