preview

Impact of SHARP on the Army In March 2009 the Army sent out an ALARACT 075/2009

Good Essays

Impact of SHARP on the Army In March 2009 the Army sent out an ALARACT 075/2009 SEXUAL
HARASSMENT/ASSAULT RESPONSE AND PREVENTION (SHARP) INITIATIVES. This ALARACT dealt with how the Army would implement the new SHARP policy. This policy took the place of the old Sexual Assault Prevention and Response (SAPR) program. The main push of the initiative is to institute a culture of change within the United States Army. The Armed Services has always been a microcosm of the US people. Nowhere else will you find a more diverse group living and working together in close proximity. It has been seen from history that whatever program and policies that the Army institutes within its ranks, the civilian population eventually follows suit. Racial …show more content…

All of these things that go into the training are just to make the soldier more aware of the choices they have, and to make sure they understand they are not alone in this.
In the training the soldiers of the United States Army receive they learn about the two types of reporting options that are available to the victims of sexual assault; the restricted reporting and the unrestricted reporting. The restricted reporting option gives the soldiers the option of seeking medical aid and counseling while not initiating a formal investigation. While this option helps the victim get the help they need it does not hold the perpetrator accountable for their actions. The unrestricted reporting on the other hand still helps the soldier get the medical treatment and counseling they may need but it initiates a formal investigation. A soldier who files a restricted report can later go back and change their report to a unrestricted and start a formal investigation but an unrestricted report can never be changed to a restricted report. The training highlights some of the behaviors that predators use so that you may know what to look out for. According to the Army there are no more passive bystanders it is everyone’s responsibility to intervene.
Congress recently has taken the Armed services to task for not doing nearly enough to stop the number of

Get Access