M1 Discuss the Nature Nurture Debate in Relation to the Development of an Individual

The nature versus nurture debate is one of the most longstanding arguments in the history

1. The on-going debate Nature vs. Nurture addresses the following questions: Are we born with

The nature-nurture debate has been around for decades. It is one of the oldest and most popular topics in the history of psychology asking what makes people who they become and how they behave and develop the way they do. What makes the debate more interesting is that now scientists are asking if personality traits and even sexual orientation can be determined by what is in already there from conception. Bodies are built up of chromosomes which contain genetic information. Many of these are inherited from parents and relatives. The nature side of the debate states the way people are is predominantly from inherited genetics and other biological factors not so much the environmental factors. The genes humans have in their bodies play a huge role to many aspects of who they are and who they become. For example, hair colour, eye colour and height are all predetermined by genes. Unchangeable. This is natures way. The argument stands to decide whether most attributes do stem from nature, genes, or if they can be affected by the environment and the way people are nurtured as they have grown. The nurture side of the argument believes although humans do have the genes and traits with which they are born, most personality traits are being made up of environmental factors. For example, being loved and cared for as children, if parents or carers were positive role models and if those people were taught in ways which provided them with discipline and respect for others. Where nature

Nature Vs Nurture is often the huge debate in psychology when it comes to determining and understanding individual’s characteristics traits. Nature is hereditary to our behavior while nurture is based on our environmental influences. Although most argue whether or not nature or nurture defines our characteristics, I believe both have an impact on we are.

Second of all, nature versus nurture is often discussed when talking about human development. Nature is the biological makeup of a person; for example, their sex, skin color, eye color, hair color, etc. Nurture is more of the social makeup which may include interactions with neighbors, family, friends, going to school, etc. Both of these terms play a huge role in a child’s development. It is pretty obvious that nurture

Intelligence can be defined in many ways: logical and computational intelligence (mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc.) and creative and artistic intelligence (music composition, drawing, singing, etc.). Many people assume that this intelligent characteristics is predetermined before birth by our genes, while others believe that intelligent characteristics can be acquired or learned throughout an individual's life. Hence, one of the naturist/naturists debates is intelligence. Naturists believe that our intelligence is determined by our genetic codes (gene that makes up a person or organism) and that heritability is a measure of genetic influence on who we are are a person and what we are capable of doing and accomplishing. If a trait has high heritability (says IQ in the Jewish community) its varying from individual to individual in a population can be explained genetically. Nurturists, on the other hand, believe that intelligence can change throughout an individual’s life (there is space for growth).

Nature vs nurture controversy is about how human beings learn. Nurture theories say that humans learn from their environments. Other people think that people abilities are based on nature and people are already wire to learn and that everything comes from their genes. Neither of them are absolutely correct. Scientist think that human beings learn from their surroundings but their genes also have an impact of how well people are able to learn, because researches have notice that the brain can change when a person

The Nature vs. Nurture debate is one of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology. Since the start of the debate psychologists argued that you were either a product of nature or nurture, not both. Nature enthusiasts suggested that you are a product of your genes, while nurture enthusiasts suggested that you are a product of your environment. What if I told you, you actually could be a product of both? Newer research and experiments suggest that many human traits and behaviors actually result from both genetic and environmental factors. Your genes help to provide the potential for a trait, but in order for the potential of said trait to be realized, your environment has to influence

In society, not one person is alike. By saying this, many people believe that they strongly take after their parents. Meaning they think Nature is a big part in their life and why they are who they are. The genes in each cell in us humans determine the different traits that we have, more dominantly on the physical connections like eye color, hair color, ear size, height, and other traits. However, it is still not known whether the more abstract attributes like personality, intelligence, sexual orientation, likes and dislikes are gene-coded in our DNA. The nurture theory has experiments showing a child’s behavior with the environment as to adult behavior. In the Nature Vs Nurture debate, everyone has their own thoughts and ideas on each

I trust that our hereditary make-up generally shapes our identity and how we will react to push and natural variables. While those natural impacts shape our identity in the feeling of how we see the world. Our conduct, attributes, identity are both formed by nature and

Nature vs. nurture debate is one of the oldest arguments in history. Many psychologists have studied the debate, but everyone seems to have a different opinion. “Thousands of people have been investigated

The debate of nature versus nurture pertains to whether or not behavior is inherited or if it is learned. Nature is acknowledged to be influenced by genetic and biological aspects. Nurture is accepted as learned characteristics, which are created by peripheral influences after birth.

Nature versus nurture has long been debated, especially in psychological research. Are humans’ development preconceived by their genes, or developed during their life cycle from experiences? As time has pasts and many studies have been created, many scientists have put their input on whether nature, or nurture, has a major impact on shaping humans. Two psychologist, Aristotle and Plato, are two individuals who studied and argued this topic heavily. Plato thought that our character, intelligence, and certain ideas are inborn, while Aristotle contended that everything in the mind comes from our senses and the external world. (Myers & Dewall, 8) I strongly believe that while both may play a huge part in shaping us, nature has the most to do with

The Nature vs. Nurture debate has been going on since the 1800s. A man named Francis Galton, had asked this question, What determines the personality or character of a person: nature or nurture? And since then, scientists have been arguing about whether your personality is more influenced by Nature, or Nurture. An example of Nature would be a separated set of twins who later came together to find they had very much in common. An example of Nurture, on the other hand, would be a feral child abandoned by society then found later in an animal-like state.

The nature versus nurture debate is a long and very difficult debate that has been going on for a long time and has gone in very many different directions. One side of people say kids become bad or good because they inherit the genes from their parents and are that way. The other side says kids become the way they are by watching someone's actions or hearing something. If a parent of some person acts in aggression or in gleefulness in front of a child they will mimic that action and do the same thing. Nature is genes inherited by parents causing people act certain ways. Nurture is children being influenced by events they have witnessed.