preview

How Did Stalin Build The Animal Farm

Good Essays

Britain. Pilkington and Napoleon form an alliance, which Napoleon eventually breaks. Frederick invades Napoleon’s farm, and Napoleon asks Pilkington for help, which he refuses to give. They do, however, reconcile their alliance. Pilkington and Churchill both went through some rough alliances with the countries they were partnering up with, but whenever said country needed help getting back on its feet, they ally with them once more. Frederick and Pinchfield Farm are an allegory for Hitler and Nazi Germany. Frederick makes a deal with Napoleon where he says he will give the pig money for timber. His checks turn out to be fraudulent, and he tries to overtake the Animal farm. This plan, however, does not work out, much like Adolf Hitler’s plan …show more content…

Stalin told his people that the plan would fix the failing economy of the USSR. He put together enormous, collective farms with the idea of increasing the food supply and stabilize a self-sufficient economy, but the opposite effect haunted Soviet Russia. Napoleon creates the Windmill to “better the lives of the animals.” He believes that the creation of this windmill will increase their food supply and lessen their workload, however, the animals end up working harder with less to show for it. The leaders created these plans for the benefit of the people, but the citizens suffered under the hand of these leaders. These plans failed. Napoleon sells wood to Frederick to pay for the farm’s expenses, which represents Nazi-Soviet Relations. Napoleon receives the money for this wood he sells, but Frederick really gives him forged bonds. This means Napoleon gave the wood away for free, and he becomes livid about this. After he forges the bonds, Frederick tries to invade and overtake Animal Farm. This greatly resembles the pact between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, where both countries agreed to divide Eastern Europe amongst themselves. Hitler broke the pact and attempted to invade Russia through land they had previously divided, but this invasion failed. Both the Nazis and Frederick betrayed the lands they formerly created an alliance with. They gained the other lands’ trust …show more content…

The characters of the story represent those in the revolution, and they each have key characteristics that each Russian leader or citizens possessed. The events that occur throughout the story correlate with each major event of Soviet history, such as the start of the revolution and the turning point of their societies. The allegory explains the importance of questioning authority and following people blindly. We, as independent thinkers, must always question and examine what others tell us, no matter what position they hold. This applies to both ancient and modern times. There will always be those ignorant to what goes on in society, and by questioning our surroundings, we can prevent corrupt leadership from

Get Access