There has been a steady decline in gun deaths in Australia since they increased the regulations on firearms in 1996. Prior to the 1996 National Firearms Agreement gun policy in Australia was “relatively lenient” (Library of Congress – Australia 2). Gun policy in Australia was regulated by each individual state or mainland territory in Australia, and was not a federal matter (Library of Congress – Australia 2). Within Australia the only aspect of gun policy that the federal government was involved in was the importation of firearms, the reason in which they got involved in this was due to the fact that it fell under “the overseas trade and commerce powers of the federal Parliament” (Library of Congress – Australia 2). Gun policy transforemed drastically due to an incident that occurred in 1996. In spring …show more content…
In a more recent study conducted between 2009-2010 showed “a decrease of 18 percentage points from the peak of 31 percentage points in 1995-96”, this was the year in which the mass shooting in Port Arthur took place, and following this was when all of the firearms regulations were introduced. In Australia, a total of three mass shootings and one other incident of gun violence with a handgun with death resulting occurred over fourteen years. Following each of these incidences there were proposals for new firearm regulations that would limit the types of guns allowed, the ammunition you were able to have, as well as regulate the people who were able to obtain a firearm, and for what reason they were able to have one. In Australia, it appears that the incidence of gun homicide, in addition to the incidence of suicide has decreased since the new regulations have been
Society’s concerns about protection from violent crimes involving firearms have encouraged Canadian Parliament to pass tougher gun control legislation. The Federal Government responded by passing Bill C-68 that created the Firearms Act,
There are gun control laws to try and reduce the number of violent shootings that occur. They are trying to put limits on weapons that Americans can own. The government is trying to take our guns away mainly because of people that are criminally insane. Most of the people who commit crimes don’t even have the weapons legally. If the government takes away the rights of people who are allowed to have firearms in their possession, it will most definitely cause an outrage. Most people believe that the people should be more capable of maintain proper use of the firearms instead of having them all taken away. Taking the firearms from Americans away would cause a lot more problems than there actually are. The people will be upset with the
Over the last two decades, Australia’s firearm laws have undergone extensive reform, resulting from two main catalyst shootings. These shootings events are known as the 1996 Port Arthur massacre and the 2002 Monash University shooting (Baker, & McPhedran, 2007).
This essay investigates the Australian gun laws and whether they are effective or not. In particular, with a focus on what the current gun laws are and how they have or have not worked also if they need to be updated. The current gun laws were first introduced by John Howard in 1997 after the mass shooting in Port Arthur where 35 people were killed and a further 18 injured on the 28th of April, 1996 (Sharpe, 2016), the laws were them further improved in 2002, after the Monash University shooting, where a commerce student with mental impairments came in to class armed with 6 loaded handguns, 2 students died and an additional 5 were injured (ABC News, 2015). It has been almost 20 years since the introduction of the current gun laws, the essay
In about every nation, gun control has always been an issue of controversy. Gun control laws are quite different from country to country, each possessing different requirements, specifications, and ordinances, so on and so on. What will be examined are the specified gun control laws in three international countries, ranging from Canada, Australia, and Japan, as well as a comparison and contrast of the the similarities and unique differences toward American gun control laws and those in other countries, and finally, the effects of having loose gun control laws. Unlike America, these countries possess stricter laws regarding gun control.
Since the Port Arthur and the Monash University shootings in Australia, there has been a substantial reduction in the number of firearm homicides and firearm suicides, due to the gun law that was introduced by John Howard. The law restricted those who could own guns and the type of firearm. Due to this law, homicide rates in Australia are only
Gun control is defined as the set of laws or policies that maintain regulation of the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification or use of firearms by civilians. There are an estimated total of 260 000 illegal guns on the street in Australia. Australia Border Force are finding 33 guns or firearm parts a week. The Australian Crime Commission (ACC) conducted an investigation into illegal firearms back in 2012. They estimated 10 000 illegal guns in the market. There were 2.75million registered guns held by 730 000 licence holders. In the 18 years prior to 1996 Australia experienced 13 mass shootings in which 104 victims were killed with at least 52 were wounded. Since the introduction of tougher gun control laws there have been no mass shootings since that time period.
Since Howard’s reforms have been put in place a mass shooting has still not occurred in Australia to this day. The fact that before the reforms were put in place in 1996, thirteen mass shootings had occurred since 1979, the gun control reforms made Australia a safer and more secure country (Donohue, 2015). The reforms that were put in place made sure that guns typically used in massacres were banned and around 700000 guns were confiscated and dismantled, which were given up by the population cooperatively. The new reforms also implemented that people needed a valid reason to now own a legal gun, which had to be approved by the police and then could finally, be purchased from a licensed arms dealer. Owning a gun for self-defence was and still
The federal government is mainly responsible for guns and gun control in Canada. Legislation covering guns and gun control in Canada consists mainly of Part II of the Criminal Code of Canada (CCC) and related regulations, and the Firearms Act. Firearms Act is an act respecting firearms and other weapons. The Canadian Firearms Program (CFP), part of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), is responsible for the authority of the Firearms Act, which covers the possession, transportation, use and storage of firearms in Canada. The CFP handles the licensing of individuals and maintains a national database of firearms records. Additional laws and regulations also apply at the provincial or municipal level of government. There are three classes
Every country is unique, but Australia is more similar to the US than is, say, Japan or England. We have a frontier history and a strong gun culture. Each state and territory has its own gun laws, and in 1996 these varied widely between the jurisdictions. At that time Australia 's firearm mortality rate per population was 2.6/100,000 – about one-quarter the US rate (pdf), according to data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the US Center for
In 1996 Australia had a mass shooting. Later that same year, they passed the National Firearms Agreement (NFA). There has not been a mass shooting since. The NFA called for Australian states and territories to regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms. This included a “ban on certain semi-automatic and self-loading rifles and shotguns, standard licensing and permit criteria, storage requirements and inspections, and greater restrictions on the sale of firearms and ammunition.”
In the Spring
Today everyone talks about gun control and how it will save lives, but what they do not take into consideration is the history of gun control and the outcome that other countries have had from establishing gun control laws. In 1935 china passed their gun control laws, three years later they had twenty million citizens, that were left defenseless, killed after the passing of gun control laws. Then In 1938 germany established their laws and just six years later germany alone had about thirteen million citizens killed after gun control laws left them defenseless. “In 1999 Australia passed gun control laws and forced the population to give up 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed this program cost the australian government over 500 million dollars. The passing of these laws caused rises in homicides, assault, armed robberies, and a 300 percent increase in homicides involving firearms. In the past
Living a life in America, we all get to have all the rights that included in the Constitution. One of those was the Second Amendment which is the rights to bear arm, the purpose was to protect ourselves from danger but nowadays a lot of people have take advantage of it and use it in the wrong way. I believe our government need to have a strict limit on guns possession.
The concepts of guns can be a tricky topic to discuss simply for the reason that guns can be used to commit crimes including homicide. There are many different countries that have different rules on gun control and deaths caused by guns. I was curious to see the countries that I had chosen being Greece, Australia, and lastly Ireland compared and contrasted about the gun numbers, deaths and injury, gun industry, gun trade and trafficking, gun regulation, international controls, and finally country profile.