Matthew and Luke both feature a genealogy of Jesus but although those genealogies should match up they differ quite severely. In many ways that is due to the fact that Luke and Matthew had very different ideas on whom exactly the messiah was. Luke’s take on the genealogies of Jesus starts at joseph and works all the way back to Adam and subsequently god (Luke 3:23). Matthew works backwards from Abraham back down to joseph and then his stepson Jesus (Matthew 1:1). Both genealogy’s merge from Abraham to David but interestingly they split when Luke defers to David’s son Nathan and Matthew turns to his other son Solomon. Luke seems to trace Jesus genealogy as the son of god while Matthew is directly tracing that of his stepfather joseph back to …show more content…
It is clear that Matthew is striving to portray Jesus as a very Jewish messiah one who follows Jewish law and whose followers do also. Matthew makes sure to trace show that Jesus truly is the “son of David” which is one of the criteria for being the true messiah. Enforcing his idea of a Jewish messiah Matthew has Jesus’ genealogy in three sets of fourteen which mark important historical events such as the deportation to Babylon. This is probably done on purpose because there are some clear inaccuracies in his genealogy that if corrected would no longer have fourteen generations between each historically momentous occasion which would be detrimental to his point. Noticeably it is stated in verse 8 that Joram is the father of Uzziah which is incorrect because Joram is actually the great-great grandfather to Uzziah (1 chronicles 3:10-12). Matthew works hard to show that Jesus is rooted in Jewish history even though that compromises his historical accuracy (Ehrman 117-18). Women were not mentioned in genealogy but Matthew mentions multiple promiscuous women in Jesus’ lineage potentially to draw a link to the real purity of the virgin birth. Overall Matthew’s history is lacking but his genealogy makes it clear that Jesus really is the king of the
Jesus was from the lineage of Abraham. God made a covenant with Abraham to make him the father of many nations. According to Matthew Jesus was the Messiah for all people. When Jesus became angry,
Matthew and Luke each contain short but elaborate birth narratives concerning Jesus’. Within each of their narratives,both Matthew and Luke mention the genealogies of Jesus which when compared to each other are quite different. In Matthews gospel he traces Jesus’ ancestry back to that “of Jesus the Messiah, the Son of David, the Son of Abraham” (Matt 1:1). While in Luke’s gospel, Jesus is traced back through David and Abraham to Adam and God. Now, even though both Matthew and Luke’s genealogies are not the same, what is even more concerning is that neither is overly correct. In regards to Matthews take on Jesus’ genealogy, one can see that his “genealogy suggests — indeed, it almost demonstrates— that the entire course of Israel’s history has proceed according to divine providence” (116). However, historians today know about two thirds of
Matthew opens his argument by describing Jesus: born of a virgin in Bethlehem, in the line of David, worshipped by Gentile Magi, brought out of Egypt, and raised in Nazareth.1 Matthew employs this list of prophecies from Mosaic Law and describes how Jesus fulfilled them all, simultaneously, as Blomberg’s notes in his portrait of Jesus, Matthew describes Jesus as “Son of David, King, and Royal Messiah,” and “Son of God.”2 Moreover, Matthew’s examples of the use of these titles throughout Matthew bear witness to Jesus’ divinity, as well as, how God could be understood through Jesus.3 Matthew proves not only Jesus’ Messiahship but His title of the Son of God.
Matthew is the first of four gospels in the New Testament. Matthew presents his story of Jesus, the demands of Christian discipline, and shares the news of the death and resurrection of Jesus. There are many questions in Matthew that can not be answered.The book of Matthew is a gospel that contains narrative history, genealogy, parables, sermons, and some prophetic oracles. The gospel of Matthew was originally written for a Jewish audience by a Jewish perspective. This is why Matthew is often referred to as "The Gospel for the Jews". Although Matthew was written for Jews, it does not include very much of the Jewish culture and tradition. Throughout the entire gospel of Matthew, it is very clear that the entire book is mainly incorporated with Jews. The book of Matthew ties in with the Old Testament several times, such as when they refer to Jesus as Messiah or King. The key word used in Matthew is "kingdom" and it is used 28 times. The reason Matthew was written was to reveal that Jesus was the messiah, the long of the Jews, and to conceive the Jews that Jesus Christ was indeed their long awaited messiah. The author of Matthew
As a young kid, I grew up knowing about my ancestry on my dad’s side of the family. I had always known that I had some family that was Native American. But as I grew up, I would tell my friends about the Tribe I am apart of, but hardly anybody believe me because I didn’t look like a Native American. Later, when I was older, people would ask if I lived in a Teepee or on a reservation. I always felt that it was fair to make assumptions like this or to not believe me when I said I was Native American even though I don’t look it.
The Gospel of Luke provides evidence on how Jesus fulfills the Old Testaments prophecies between God and Israel, and carries the old covenant to the new one. The book of Luke mainly documents how Jesus expands on God’s kingdom by creating a new one know as the Upside Down Kingdom; where everyone is invited even those who are low on the social ladder. It shows how Jesus restores or reverse their life problems; freeing them from the tyranny of evil and sin. He teaches his followers about the Upside Down Kingdom; how to honor humility and welcome anyone who repents for their sins. Jesus use parables to help teach his followers the right way. Throughout the book their is clearly enough evidence to support Jesus as the rightful Messianic King, not
In the Gospel of Matthew, the focus on the Jewish genealogy of Jesus played a significant role in the birth story. To fully understand Jesus, it was imperative to first acknowledge who Jesus was within Jewish ancestry and his subsequent position as King of the Jews.
In Matthew Jesus is portrayed as the Jewish light this is where Jesus was emphasizes the importance of the Jewish law to his people. Also, Jesus is the authoritative teacher and the king of the Jews. Also, Matthew clearly points to Jesus divinity since only God can change the laws that he had given to the people. The gospel of Matthew, Matthew’s gospel, is the first book of the four gospels and also the first book of the New Testament. Matthew’s writings are symbolized by an
Luke's genealogy of Jesus and his birth narrative compare with the one found in Matthew's gospel is that the birth narratives in both Matthew and Luke helps their readers to know who Jesus is and where he comes from.
Consequently The Jews view as a prophet according to Dr E. Two nation would be birth out of his loins. From beginning to end, Jewish question for meaning was rooted in their understand of the Supreme Being. The second nation with Sarah and Abraham birth Isaac. Hagar is the step mother to Isaac. According to Houston Smith Jewish hope that Messianic idea came to have two sides a politico –national side which foresaw the triumph of Jews over their enemies and their elevation to a position of importance in world affairs and a spiritual – universal side in which their political triumph would be attended by a moral advance of universal proportion. The second difference concerned the way the Messianic age would arrive. Some expected an actual Messiah, while others foresaw God dispensing with a human agent and intervening directly to institute an age of universal harmony. Houston Smith said tension reflected restorative and utopian impulses in Judaism. Restorative Messianic looked for a King recreation of past conditions typically the Davidic Monarchy as idealized Judaism forward looking impulse by envisioning the Messianic Age as a state of things never before existed. This was very reason they crucified Christ because they simply did not believe who he was. According to the Bible Christian centers in the life of Jesus of Nazareth .He was born in Palestine, probably around 4 B.C. and grew up in Nazareth. In the Sea of Galilee he
For starters, we know that Jesus was a descendent of David. In the very first verse of the Gospel of Matthew he is referred to as “Jesus the Messiah, the son of David.” Elsewhere in the Gospels Jesus is often directly addressed as Son of David, such as in the account of blind Bartimaeus who says to him in Mark 10:47, “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!” And when Jesus enters Jerusalem on
Unfortunately for Israel, Jesus had other ideas about what constituted a relationship to the Messiah. Thus, in Matthew 12:46-50, it is recorded that Jesus’ rejected the idea of a blood relationship to the Messiah when Jesus refused to acknowledge the blood relationship that existed between Jesus and Jesus’ mother and brothers (Pentecost, 1981). Pointing to the disciples, Jesus’ Words indicated that any relationship to the Messiah must be spiritual and based on faith; furthermore, any relationship to the Messiah must also consist of wanting to do the Will of God (Pentecost, 1981). Jesus Words in Matthew’s narrative ran counterculture to what the Israelites believed; therefore, Israel continued to reject Jesus as the
The genealogy of Jesus in Matthew and Luke are very different which can be confusing to many people because at first glance, it does not look like any of the names are the same. When I look at the names, I cannot find any of them that are alike because they are not in the same order and they do not end on the same person. In Matthew, he lists names of women while Luke does not list a single women’s name. There are, however, several different reasons from people like scholars on why this could be possible. For example, some scholars think that one book is about Josephs ancestry and the other about Mary’s ancestry. This could be true, but there are many other arguments for this subject.
Matthew is claimed to be between AD 80 and 100. Matthew focus was for the Jewish Christians who were being pushed out of their communities in Galilee. It is very important to Matthew that Jesus is the son of Abraham. The Jesus was a jew in the sense of it all. Matthew emphasizes that the coming of Jesus was the supreme event in history. Every circumstance including the birth, life, teaching, death, and resurrection of Jesus was the fulfillment of the prophecy.
According to Jewish scripture, Jesus was destined from birth to fulfill the roll of Christ, or The Messiah. Jesus’ life consisted of walking from town to town, healing the sick and preaching about the imminent kingdom of God. The Gospel according to John also tells the story of Jesus, but is much different that the other three. John’s gospel focuses more on wrestling with the idea that Jesus was the Son of God.