“Direct evidence of the benefits of early detection of type 2 diabetes by screening are lacking and are now unlikely to be obtained.” Khunti K, Davies M (2012) Type 2 diabetes is common and more so now, evidence backing the efficiency and usefulness of screening is limited (Khunti K, Davies M 2012). There are no trials done of screened patients and non screened patients and thus no evidence to go with this perfect way of comparing the cost-effectiveness of this method (Khunti K, Davies M, 2012). Type 2 diabetes meets the criteria for screening, including being potentially asymptomatic, undiagnosed, there are diagnostic problems and resulting in no harm during screening. (Goyder L, Irwig L, Payne N 2012) on the other hand, cites that …show more content…
This, in turn, reduced screening uptake and was not efficient. To counter this problem the World health organisation recommended the use of glycated haemoglobin (Khunti K, Davies M, 2012). All of the models were through individual screening rather than a population-based method and there is no evidence to back individual rather than population approach. Since there is a finite amount of resources, resources used for assessing the risk and preventing diabetes are not used elsewhere where they are required. Serious diabetes complications are not resourced enough through this (Goyder L, Irwig L, Payne N 2012). Although a population focus rather than individual focus will free up health service resources for prevention of complications in people with clinical diabetes (Goyder L, Irwig L, Payne N 2012). (Khunti K, Davies M, 2012), uses the National Health Service Health Checks programme and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence’s guidance on identification and prevention of type 2 diabetes future publication as evidence for screening. The NHS health check introduced in 2009 for people 45-74 years old, assessing health status and risk of diabetes. Whereas the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence’s guidance uses self-assessed risk scores and lifestyle recommendations to reduce risk. This compliments (Goyder L,
Health check programmes are effective only if the lifestyle interventions offered prevent or delay type 2 diabetes. Currently the interventions offered to people identified
This essay will focus on type 2 diabetes, which is becoming one of the fast growing chronic health conditions in the United Kingdom (UK). Approximately 700 people are diagnosed with type 2 diabetes each day in the UK (Diabetes Uk, (2014)a). It is costing the NHS about £10billion pounds each year to treat diabetes along with its complication and it is expected to rise in the next couple of years (Diabetes UK, (2014)b).
The literature review found that the results of type 2 Diabetes among low income individuals seem to be relatively low than previous studies. Even though people reported having twice as much risk of chronic illnesses the number of people diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes was insignificant accounting for 95% CI below poverty line 0.6 (0.5,0.7) (Bhojani et al., 2013). In this case it may be that more people remain undiagnosed than those who self-report in the surveys.
Self-reported data are collected through questionnaires, interviews, or telephone surveys rather than clinical examinations and biometrical analyses. The advantages of using questionnaire in epidemiological studies are low cost and relatively high efficiency in data collection. Self-reported diagnosis of diabetes has been found to be a valid tool to evaluate people’s diabetes status in recent studies
Patients are usually given a blood test to show if diabetes is present, the test may be given because of questionable symptoms one has had or from genetic history. If after testing hemoglobin levels in your blood, and diagnosed with diabetes, insulin will then be a part of a patients’ daily routine (Insel, Deecher, & Brewer, 2012).Tests are taken to determine whether or not hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia is present. When this is discovered, the tests become more frequent. A variety of tests are done in order to keep one in good health. If diagnosed in time, and with proper care, many complications can be prevented. JDRF will be supporting
The rate of diabetes in the United States is one of the highest compared to other developed countries. An estimate of 9.3% of the population have diabetes, of those with diabetes 27.8% have yet to be diagnosed (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2014). This means that approximately 8.1 million people are currently living with diabetes, but are unaware of it. As of 2012, 12.3% of people with diabetes were 20 years old or older, the largest population diagnosed with diabetes were adults 65 years old or older. 25.9% of this population lives with diabetes (CDC, 2014). On a national level, the CDC have launched initiatives that focus on prevention and disease management. The National Diabetes Prevention Program is an example of one such initiative. This program focuses on lifestyle changes,
Throughout the whole of the United Kingdom, between 2 and 3 of every 100 people have a
The Characteristics of the diabetes are very distinctive and in some cases they are unnoticed. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2014), recommends individuals contact their physician if they
Another advantage of screening is the fact that one test, the FPG, can easily diagnose type 2 diabetes. The test may need to be repeated a few times for accuracy but there is no need to use other types of expensive tests. The last advantage is being able to educate the individual about the risk factors and signs and symptoms of type 2 diabetes as well as ways to prevent the disease. With advantages there are also disadvantages such as having to redo a test because of inaccuracy. Sometimes with the FPG, providers want to do it a few times because one high reading is not enough to diagnose diabetes. Another disadvantage is that technology is not perfect and there will be false positives given. These false positives will give the individual unnecessary anxiety as they will be told to undergo more testing whereas individuals who actually do have the disease may not test positive and they will miss out on early treatment (Kudzma & Harrington, 2014). The last disadvantage is false positive readings will increase the cost of health care because of all the extra unnecessary testing or
While carrying my research I will questionnaires to collect my primary data and this will assist me to gain lots of different answers, for me to be able to understand my research more. According to the daily mirror science editor (15/05/08) The problem is that you could have type 2 diabetes for up to 12 years without knowing it simply because the symptoms are often quite general, seem
For the purpose of this paper it will provide an overview of ways that diabetes, type 2, can be prevented if a person is at risk for developing it. Although there has been little research that diabetes can always be prevented there are ways that a person can delay or improve their symptoms.
With that said, for the diabetes screening campaign, will send a weekly mass e-mail to all community health clinics reminding them to encourage the patients, and give them an informational pamphlet about where they can go for free diabetes screening. Upon registration, everyone would be asked to share their E-mail as part of their participation for the free service. Personnel will also use these E-mails to send a vast yearly reminder e-mail to those who are
Diabetes is a lifestyle disease that can’t be solved with a single technical solution, like a vaccine for infectious diseases. Type 2 diabetes is dangerous silent that will slowly-slowly affects people over time. This requires multi-pronged effort: Early detection and better diagnostics to
Over the past few years, a rapid increase in type 2 DM prevalence has been documented worldwide. The word epidemic is increasingly used in the context of diabetes and obesity. Even more alarming, type 2 DM is now present and apparently increasing in younger people, including children (14). To what extent the increase in the proportion of people with diabetes is explained by an increasing incidence of the disease, and how much is it due to increased relative survival or earlier diabetes detection, still remains to be answered. The documented epidemic of obesity (15) together with increasing incidence rates of type 2 DM (16,17,18) suggest that the rapid increase in diabetes prevalence throughout the world can largely be attributed to the increasing
Furthermore, despite the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) did not show a significant trend in the reduction of myocardial infarction (MI) rates, the 10-year follow up of this trial