My thoughts or position on the issue whether or not children should be restricted from spending time in front of media screens is they should be restricted. I believe this because children are spending time infront of media screens for 7.5 hours per day. And that takes away from exercise or well just being outside. From the passage it says "screen time takes a mental and physical toll on kids. ...light from screens confuses viewers body clocks." What that means is they cant tell how long they have been starring at the screen and lose track of time. Also from the passage it says that it disrupts sleep, saps mental energy and even depression has been linked to screen viewing before sleep. Now this one is obvious to a lot of people there
I believe children should be limited to a certian amount of time, when it comes to staring at a screen. "Screen time takes a mental and physical toll on kids." (Screen Time Limits Are Vital for Children). With these tolls taken on the body there is very little energy for children to use their own imagination. Children become more interested in what's playing on the TV than they are with what's going on outside of the box.
Technology has been part of our daily live more frequently than before. Screen time has been more popularly used on kids and adolescents. On a daily bases many kids seem to spend more time inside on their tablets, instead of having to spend time with other kids. This is a problem that is becoming more popular over the years,on whether kids need to spend that much time on technology or not. Parents either seem to have strict technology usage, or they either don’t. There has always been a huge controversy with experts, who either think that screen time is beneficial or could cause problems later on in life. There are many views towards this topic, from hurting kids brains, to helping them during school, and socially.
Research shows that the majority of screen time has a negative effect on children of all ages. Children ranging from ages two to 11, on average, spend anywhere from 25 to 35 hours a week in front of the television, or other forms of screen time. At such young
Have you ever heard this or personally been told this? My parents would tell me this all the time. It is used for more than one thing. Friends, education, reading, etc. The list goes on and on. Most critics rely on screen time not the screen quality. Outsiders don't really know what is the real deal. A problem always results when a person doesn't have 100% of details. Assumptions are always made. In the passage it says, "The truth is that what is viewed on a screen and how it is viewed is more important than the amount of viewing time". A toddler can run around all day blabbing some type of alien language. We don't know what they could be saying. If they have the chance to watch an educational show, they will develop vocabulary from that show. In the first passage, "Screen Time Limits Are Vital for Children" it mentions that 'play time' doesn't help the development. Personally this is a big debate. But putting it into perspective, it makes sense. A child will develop vocabulary or hands on skills if they have the chance to have play
Research has revealed that majority of Australian children are getting more than the recommended amount of screen time. A decade long study tracked 4000 pre-schoolers throughout their growth the teenagers. Genevieve Alison published the article ‘Most Australian children spend too much time glued to screens, research reveals’ in the Herald Sun on the 20th September 2016. Alison argues that Australian children spend too much time glued to screens. She expresses a logical and rational tone which swings to a more sophisticated and calm tone later in the article. These tones position the reader to keep reading as it is very informative and has evidence to back her claims. Using persuasive techniques, Alison explains and suggests that screen time
The purpose of the research article from the scholarly journal Childhood Education (2014) is to discuss the arguments currently surrounding the topic of media, technology, and screen time (MeTS) and its use with young children, and create an international dialogue on what steps should be taken in the future on how to responsibly use MeTS in a way that is productive and developmentally appropriate. The authors first discuss what global issues currently stand referring to MeTS, citing statistics of television, video game, and computer exposure among young children (children younger than 6). It is described that in the United States alone, “83% of children under 6 years old use…two hours with a television and DVD player, 1 hour with video
Children should not be restricted from the media center of the tv screen or smart phones etc. However there should be a limit.If there is a limit on watching tv then the kids wouldnt be couch potatos like i use to be. In my defense it was amazing sitting around lounging watching tv with friends playing video games etc. But there comes the bad things about sittin inside all day watching tv. You can gain alot of weight watching tv,There for you can become obese and many other health issues can come from it.
There have been a multitude of studies in recent years on the subject of screen time and the effects it can have on children of all ages. Previously, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended that children from 0-2 years of age not be exposed to any screen time at all (American Academy of Pediatrics, [AAP], 2016). This included television, video games, smart phones, tablets, movies and computers. The AAP has recently changed its recommendation, though, stating that “Some media can have educational value for children starting at around 18 months of age, but it 's critically important that this be high-quality programming, such as the content offered by Sesame Workshop and PBS.” (AAP, 2016). The recommendation for children ages 2-5 is still the same, at one hour of high quality programming a day, and for children age 6 and older, to use consistent limits on the
Children should limit their time on media screens, for example in passage 1, it says children in the united states have an average of 7.5 hours of screen time per day. I understand that electronics such as ipads, cell phones or computers are entertaining, but as young children should'nt surround their themselves around that much screen time, they are basically throwing all of their youth away. My opinion kids need to be kids, and play outside with their friends, interact, and play with their toys.
I think children should be restricted to spend time in front of media screens. My answer is very strong more towards younger children. Children have undeveloped body parts and some of the main ones are the eyes and the brain. The brain can easily be damaged from anything, because their brain is still developing. Which some children and parents are not understanding or not knowing, this is information every parent should know when thier expecting or already have a child.
Should children be segregated from each other in schools based on their gender? Many teachers and students alike will argue no. Separating boys and girls in the classroom, setting applies that boys are superior than girls and girls are inferior than boys. After thorough research it was discovered that male children were not much different than there female counterparts after all. Men are no longer the only ones to choose a higher education or work outside of the home, numberless women chose to do so as well. As a result, this teaches sexism instead of promoting that one gender is equal to the next.
In my opinion "It's Time to Let GO of Screen Fears"(2) has many vailid points, however "Screen Time Limits Are Vital for Children"(1) does have some good facts as well. I can help prove with my own experinces with technolagy that it can make you lose sleep. as stated in (1) "According to a scintific journal article, light from screens confuses viewrs' body
In April 2017, a children's media expert, Sara DeWhitt, gave an intriguing but short speech that she titled "3 fears about screen time for kids--and why they aren’t true" to compelled the audience to believe that children are highly impacted by screen time. This speech was spoken at an official Ted Talk conference located in Vancouver, Canada. The speech was just shy of twelve minutes, but has the future ability to impact millions of people for millions of years. Throughout her speech, DeWhitt focuses the discussion on the positive impact of screen time and contests the perceived negative one. Her main purpose was to correctly inform the audience of the fears most people commonly believe. This is easily identifiable when she discusses her fears and backs them up with statistics and data, she had previously studied. (Q1) The central message was easy to pick up and clear in her speech because she exaggerated that she had three points and then later went on in the body paragraphs to discuss each fear she had for the future of electronic devices. (Q2) The speech never left me questioning what her purpose was. It was abundantly clear that she wanted the truth of these devices to be released and that's what she accomplished.
(Ravichandran, France de Bravo, 2010, “Yound Children and Screentime”.) Although these media tupes are readily available, whether they be for entertainment or educational use, are they really in the children's best interest?
Our society has made astounding advancements in the world of technology, and as a result it is becoming increasingly integrated into the daily lives of adults and children alike. Children seem to be spending less time outdoors and doing other activities than they are on the computer, watching television, or playing video games. There is a legitimate concern for children who seem to use media with excess. Adults often wonder, how much is too much. There is differing opinion among many on the answer. There are benefits and consequences to prolonged media use, that need to be examined in order to discover and promote a healthy balance.