Brian's Accountability Case Study

The aggravating conflict was between American top-management (represented by Andrew) and Korean top-management (represented by Mr. Song) in solving the situation. Both believed that what it wants is incompatible with what the other want (mutually exclusive). The American side blamed Korean consultants' lack of experience for the problem of behind the deadline, while the Korean side blamed Ellen's capabilities. This conflict was also a dysfunctional conflict as it harmed the company's harmony and business. If the management could not find a solution to solve conflict, the company would fail to meet the deadline, which might totally kill the company's reputation.

Accountability is defined by department of defense as the obligation imposed by a law or lawful order or regulation on an officer or other person for keeping an accurate record of government property, documents or funds. The numerical end product of personnel accountability process reflects the combat power of a unit.

It was Melinda's fault because she put herself in that dangerous situation. Melinda most likely knew that something like that would have happened at party like that. It was unsupervised and it was filled with kids that

Firstly, communication is key in every situation. Proper communication in this story could have prevented a lot of the negative issues that occurred.

Abby was definitely the one who should hold most of the blame for this whole mess, but other people’s hands were also

Accountability is not an abstract concept. It is actually extremely simple. Accountability means saying what you mean, meaning what you say, and doing what you say you 're

Accountability (noun) Being responsible or liable for someone or something at the state of event and or situation.

Due to a lack of verbal preparation between Andrew and Margaret, the scene becomes uncomfortable. In addition, due to there being physical and psychological noise at the party, successful communication become extremely difficult. Andrew and Margaret unfortunately did not have the important skills required for successful interpersonal communications to occur during this scene. One example of how Andrew and Margaret did not work

What is accountability? The obligation imposed by law or lawful order or regulation on an officer or other person for keeping accurate record of property, documents, or funds. The person having this obligation may or may not have actual possession of the property, documents, or funds. Accountability is concerned primarily with records, while responsibility is concerned primarily with custody, care, and safekeeping.

The Importance of Accountability is so my chain of command knows where everyone is so if they need a soldier for something they will know where to find them. It is also necessary to have accountability to make sure everyone in my class, platoon, or unit is safe and to make sure they are where they are supposed to be.

What is accountability; the definition is simply liable to account for one’s actions, “A is accountable to B when A is obliged to inform B about A’s (past or future) actions and decisions, to justify them, and to suffer punishment in the case of eventual misconduct. Accountability is a concept in ethics with several meanings. It is often used synonymously with such concepts as answerability, enforcement,

     Accountability is defined as, the obligation imposed by law or lawful order or regulation on an officer or other person for keeping accurate record of property, documents, or funds. The person having this obligation may or may not have actual possession of the property, documents, or

Accountability is the obligation imposed by law or lawful order or regulation on an officer or other person for keeping accurate record of property, documents, or funds. The person having this obligation may or may not have actual possession of the property, documents, or funds. Being accountable in the United States Army is another very important aspect of being a good soldier as well.

at fault for their unresponsiveness and discoordination. Some people might also see Nate as a

He is in a huge dilemma and feels he might be held accountable for the current problem. The antecedents that might have lead to the whole scenario are1- Bob has been under a lot of work pressure, as a quarter million had been taken out of his budget, and he had to travel very often for work purpose. 2- Jay did not give Annette a proper orientation to the company, and its culture. He should have also introduced her to all the VPs and other important personnel of the company. 3- Bob was facing certain problems in his personal life, which triggered his anger. 4- Bob was being be threatened by Annette’s new ideas. 5- Annette did not use a proper communication channel. 6- Jay lacked communication skills. 7- Jay is not a good leader. He was very ambivalent. He did not have his fundamental objectives well stated, and did not communicate his concerns to the employees & senior managers. Therefore, all these incidents summed up, and lead to the present problem.