Alexander II Emancipation Manifesto

Alexander the Great was king of the Macedonians and one of the greatest generals in history. As a student of the Greek philosopher Aristotle, Alexander was embedded with lasting interests in philosophy, politics and warfare. As king, he settled problems by immediate action, making quick decisions and taking great risks. His armies overcame these risks by sheer force and by the ingenious tactics instilled in them by Alexander. He and his armies conquered the Persian Empire, which stretched from the Mediterranean Sea to India and formed much of what was then considered the civilized world. Through his conquests, Alexander helped spread Greek ideas, customs and laws throughout Asia and Egypt and adopted a uniform

New Orleans, Louisiana was greatly influenced by Greek ancestry and culture. It has taken many different aspects of Greek culture that have impacted the different traditions we have today, such as architecture, city elements, and Mardi Gras. Greek influenced New Orleans street names as well as Mardi Gras. New Orleans architecture was affected by Greeks and we also have many sites in New Orleans that we're affected by greek culture.

Thousands of people

Without compensation, they refused to work any longer. This caused the nobility to finally realize that with such a high demand for these workers, they had to pay them. In addition to their newfound freedom and pay, peasants could now purchase their own land (47). This was a major change in the system of feudalism. The world of the nobility was forever upturned (47).

During this time feudalism was very popular, the king would grant land to people in the higher class, and in return they would give a fief to a knight in return. Sometimes Bishops and nobles would have servants working on their land, so that would give the knights something extra. However, “massive loss of lives in disasters reduced the workforce that surviving workers were able to demand higher wages and greater independence. This contributed to the collapse of the feudal system in which peasants were obligated to work land and pay taxes to the knight, baron, or king who owned the land” (Ziegler 33). Several lives were loss everyday, and the few that were surviving demanded more.

Hardly any other historians have earned a reputation as virtuous as Alexander the Great. In just thirteen years, Alexander was not only discerned as a military genius, but became exceedingly notorious for conquering Persia and known as the King of Macedonia. Many hold him responsible for the unification of Greece and the Hellenistic age; the blending of cultures. After Alexander had extended the control of his empire past the Asia Minor, Egypt, Central Asia and on to Persia, he was competent to effectively manage and incorporate other cultures and people under his rule by disseminating Greek culture, embracing religion with encouragement, and respecting other cultures with gratification to customs.

The main difference about Alexander the Great from other people is that he hated to be called a conqueror because he believed conquerors are cruel and do unnecessary punishments. He was not that kind of leader, he only believed in punishment if you resisted his demands. After the Battle of Issus, Alexander respected King Darius and ultimately didn’t take his throne. The liberator took over the city of Tyre where the Phoenicians lived. He wasn’t as kind to this city, they resisted and tried to fight back.

Alexander could be a very justly ruler, but if you got on his bad side it would not end well for those. Alexander showed mercy to many people after he had conquered their land. An example was after he took over Thebes, he allowed many people to walk away free such as priests, family members of the poet Pindar, and citizens who remained loyal to him. Although he did sell over 20,000 citizens into slavery. I understand why he made this action. He did not want for a rebellion like what happened in Thebes to occur

Overpopulation and shortage of resources led to malnutrition and extreme poverty for many peasants. After so many people died, serfs were free to move to other estates that provided better conditions and receive top pay for their work. Landowners, desperate for their labor, often provided free tools, housing, seed and farmland. The worker farmed all he could and paid only the rent. Economy underwent abrupt and extreme inflation. Since it was so difficult (and dangerous) to procure goods through trade and to produce them, the prices of both goods produced locally and those imported from other places increased rapidly. Because of illness and death workers became exceedingly scarce, so even peasants felt the effects of the new rise in wages. The demand for people to work the land was so high that it threatened the manorial holdings. Serfs were no longer tied to one master; if one left the land, another lord would instantly hire them. The lords had to make changes in order to make the situation more profitable for the peasants and so keep them on their land. In general, wages outpaced prices and the standard of living was subsequently raised. As a consequence of the beginning of small amounts of

Peasants would demand more money for their work which in turn would help increase the standard of living. This economical change would also help end serfdom by giving serfs the chance to buy their freedom. Eventually the inflation died down due to an oversupply of items. So many people had died that they had more supply then what was needed in their economy and this factor also helped raise the standard of living. Since the peasants were on the rise it meant that the Nobles income would fall sharply due to the fact that they had to pay peasants more, the rent payments shrank, and often the price to live on the land was severely reduced or eliminated.

The shortage of labor was one, workers now got payed more than just the minimum amount to live on. Decameron Web states that, "The lords had to make changes in order to make the situation more profitable for the peasants and so keep them on their land. In general, wages outpaced prices and the standard of living was subsequently raised" (Courie). They could spend more on things that they enjoyed rather than just food and shelter. This is one of the factors that led to the Renaissance because people could now focus on things like arts and learning instead of just survival. Serfs who had been tied to land for generations before the Plague could now leave and do almost anything they wanted because of the labor shortage. According to John Kelly, "In the second half of the fourteenth century, a man could simply up and leave a manor, secure in the knowledge that wherever he settled, someone would hire him; alternatively, the peasant could use his new leverage to extract rent reductions or obtain relief from hated feudal obligations such as the heriot- or death tax- from a hard-pressed lord" (285). This led to the disappearance of the feudal system and an increase in a middle, working class along with an increase in standard of living for them. Now that peasants and serfs could choose what they want to do as a job, they could also move up on the social scale. They

Politically, peasants saw little change in the respect of working-class having say in this department, however there were some major changes during this period that did affect the working class. The greatest

There are many leaders in the world, but a great ruler is passionate, honorable and one who can inspire even in the most hopeless circumstances. Alexander the Great was a great ruler. Alexander the Great was a ruler that was not only inspiring, but he was fearless, smart, bold and courageous. Alexander the Great inspired his soldiers to crave more. He has inspired people since the day he started ruling. What is inspirational about Alexander the Great is that he inspired his troops to the point that they did not question him when they were outnumbered three to one in a battle, they trusted him with their lives and were willing to die for him (Alexander the Great: man behind the legend).

Born Late July 356 BC in Pella, Macedonia Died June,10 323 BC in The Palace of Nabukodonossor, Babylon

Life as a serf or peasant was not easy. Serfs were bound to their lord's land and required to do services for him. Although they could not be sold like slaves, they had no freedom (Ellis and Esler 219-244). Peasants farmed for the goods that the lord and his manor needed. They went through difficult hardship because of this. Peasants were heavily taxed and had to provide for themselves the goods that they needed (“The Middle Ages”). According to the medieval law, the peasants were not considered to 'belong to' themselves (“The Middle Ages”). Although serfs were peasants and had relatively the same duties and similar rights, what differentiated a peasant from a serf was that a peasant was not bound to the land (“The Middle Ages”). Peasants had no schooling and no knowledge of the outside world (Ellis and Esler 219-244). They rarely traveled more than a couple miles outside of their villages. All members of a peasant family, including children, tended crops, farmed, and did some sort of work to help out (Ellis and Esler 224). Very few peasants lived past the age of 35 because of hunger in the winter and the easy development and transmission of disease (Ellis and Esler 224).