Alexander The Great Research Paper

After crossing the Hellespont with an army of 35,000 men, he met his first Persian battle on the banks of the Granicus River. His cavalry charged across the Granicus and overwhelmed the Persians. From there, Alexander went on to conquer all of Asia Minor with little resistance (“Alexander the Great.'; 2). After recovering from a serious illness in 333 B.C., Alexander marched to Syria, where the king of Persia, Darius III, had fortified a riverbank near Issus with 600,000 men (Durant 544). Again Alexander attacked with his cavalry and defeated the Persians. Darius III managed to escape but left behind his family and a large amount of money.

Alexander was a great leader because he was a inspiring leader to many later coming kings. According to paragraph 8 of the background essay “Julius Caesar wept in front of a Alexander statue because he had conquered so much in such little time”. This proves that even Caesar was inspired and awed by Alexander. According to document E Marcus Macrinus had Alexander sewn into his clothing for 540 years. Alexander really had to inspire Marcus to make him put Alexanders face on his clothes for 540 years. Alexander really inspired

Alexander the Great is often seen as a ruthless conqueror due to his victory over the Thebans and his conquest to conquer Persia. During all of his conquering, he established many great cities and showed compassion to many rebels.

Alexander the Great is a conqueror who has accomplished greater feats than any other man in history. The words of his father, King Phillip II, were prophetic when Alexander tamed a fearful horse at a young age, “My boy, you must find a kingdom big enough for your ambition. Macedon is too small for you”. Thus, his determination as a child carried over into his reign as King of Macedonia, making him the most successful leader of all time. His success is contributed to his respected leadership style, his strategic thinking, and his ability to spread Greek civilization to vast areas of the world.

Alexander the Great ruled his kingdom as a king that had tunneled his skills and had a good deal of experience in the past. He was thankful that his father, Philip, gave him the best teachers

Alexander the Great was a young leader, with a very successful but very short life ahead of him. Alexander was born in Pella in Greece at the northern part of the country. He started his life at356 BC, and died at the very young age of 33 in 323 BC. After dying from causes that have not been proven yet many theories that he had died from Malaria, due to him being sick and having a very high temperature and fever 10 days leading up to the time he died. Alexander had a range of achievements and the loyalty of his army and the citizens that he lead, with the death of the Persian leader Darius the 3rd in 330BC he didn’t stop there. With many more significance towards him and other achievements which led to the making of one of the world’s bravest king and soldier, and what he went through to make sure his civilians did not live in terror. And a perfect army that him and his Father Philip had formed to be unstoppable. As well as the creation of a capital that is now a hue tourist attraction.

In order to understand the decisions made by Alexander the Great, we must look at his tutor Aristotle. King Philip asked Aristotle to be his son’s teacher, because of the history he had in politics and education. The people of Athens did not accept Aristotle, because of the high regard that Athenians held on being born in Athens. Aristotle spent his life writing down his thoughts on everything from politics to the meaning of dreams. He wanted his students and future generations to be able to learn from him. Future generations were influenced by Aristotle and people still are today. I believe that Alexander the Great reflected many of the teachings of Aristotle, while he sat on the throne, and he might not be considered great without those lessons.

Alexander the great was the King of Macedonia and the conqueror of the Persian Empire. He is consider to be the one of the all-time greatest kings and military geniuses. In just 13 years he conquered the largest empire in the ancient world that cover the area of 3000 miles. He was the son of King of Macedonia Philip II and the Princess of Epirus Olympias. He was a brilliant, patient and never make a move without careful planning. Alexander escalated to the Macedonian throne after the assassination of Phillip in 366BC. He was surrounded by enemies and he quickly disposed of all of his domestic enemies by ordering their

His army finally refuses to go further. At last, Alexander dies at Babylon in 323 B.C.E and his empire is divided.(Powell,46)” After reading this segment, I think that it is a very hard thing for Alexander to conquer such a big area in his period, but he successfully conquered this big amount of land. The good thing about conquering this big amount of land is that once all of the lands are united, there will be no more wars between all the land so that Alexander brings peace to a big amount of people. Even though that Alexander slaughtered quite a bit of people during these wars that he fought, but what he did in exchange is saving more people, not killing more, what he brought to most of the people is peace. Alexander actually don't like killing, he asked for peace before invading Thebes, but the people in Thebes rebelled, so then he was forced to kill the people who were against him.

At the age of 19, Alexander the Great had to become the new leader for his kingdom, just after watching his father tragically die. Previously, his father, Philip II of Macedon, defeated the Greeks, and planned to attack Persia. But when Philip was suddenly murdered, Alexander stepped up and followed his father’s plan. After successfully conquering all of Persia, the young king moved on to conquering Egypt, Babylon, Persepolis, and lots of other territories, thus giving him the name, “Alexander the Great”. Alexander the III of Macedon truly was great through his ability to change the course of the world.

And the question is, what happened when money and favor were no longer enough, especially when we consider the down side such as the huge numbers of casualties stemming from Alexander’s battles,[14] the numerous demands for reinforcements, and especially the forced settlement from Macedon and Greece to the newly-founded cities at the farthest ends of the world.[15] But he was not just a general; he was a king too, and hence military exploits form only a percentage of what Alexander did, or did not do in other words, we must look at the package of him as king as a

Alexander achieved more noteworthy deeds than most of the rulers who had lived before him, but additionally, the individuals who were to come later down to our time. Alexander the Great was conceived at Pella Macedonia in 356 B.C.E. He spent his adolescent years watching his dad changing Macedonia into an extraordinary military force. His Father was King Phillip and his mother was Olympias. His mom was the rule of neighboring Epirus. She was a profoundly otherworldly woman who taught her child about his predecessors, for example, Achilles and Hercules. From his most punctual age, he was molded for victory and eminence in being a lord. He then got to be centered on turning into an extraordinary ruler, which he soon would get to be.

His father was killed which lead him to seeking revenge on those who he thought could have had a part in his father’s death. Alexander had at his disposal light auxiliaries, archers, a siege train, and a cavalry. Thanks to his father, Alexander's army was largely a professional one. When Alexander was the age of 22, he had conquered Greece and was sailing to Asia, in what is now central Turkey. Eventually he cut the Gordian Knot pleasing a Greek lore that whoever conquered would rule the world. Overtime he destroyed the armies of Darius and gained control of the whole Eastern Mediterranean Coast. His health was destroyed at the age of 33 from a fever. At the time of his death his empire reached from Greece to northern India. In conclusion he was a very effective general and won almost all of his battles, often having the short end of the stick and being on unfamiliar ground, along with being far away from his supply lines. Alexander was thoughtful about establishing the structures of society, as he founded many cities to do well with. He built canals, ports, roads and set up local governments which included local people. Although it is hard to justify a conqueror if we mean good in the sense of moral, but if we talk more effective than he is the one to set the bar at the age of only 19! Alexander destroyed the Persain Empire forever. More importantly, he spread Greek culture known as Hellenism across his empire. This marked a new era known as the Hellenistic age due to the influence Greek culture had on other people. If Alexander the Great didn’t complete this, Greek ideas and culture might have remained in the walls of Greece (Acrobatiq,

During the course of his life and reign, Alexander had fought and won many battles and wars, defeating many kings and warlords throughout the ancient world. Perhaps his most recognized conquest was of the Achaemenid Empire of Persia and its ‘King of Kings’ Darius III during the Battle of Issus 1. After defeating the Persians at the Battle

Alexander was a great conqueror and leader. He set out to conquer the world and some people would call him “great” for the things he did, but some people argue that he wasn’t has great as he was said to be. I believe he was great because he had great military power, he built magnificent cities, and a he was a good leader.