PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS(LOOSELEAF)
7th Edition
ISBN: 9781260110920
Author: Frank
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 16, Problem 2RQ
To determine
Illustration of
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
In 2017, Ecuador's biggest export was crude (unprocessed) petroleum, 63% of which it exported to the United States, and
Ecuador's biggest import was refined (processed) petroleum, of which 70% was imported from the United States. What does
this tell you about the countries' comparative advantages in extracting petroleum and refining petroleum?
This information suggests that
has a comparative advantage in refining petroleum, and
the United States
must I
ntage in extracting petroleum.
Ecuador
Q2. Suppose that there are two countries (A and B) and two goods (a labor-intensive good X, textile, and a capital-intensive good Y, electronics). The two countries have identical demand for the two goods but different labor and capital endowments. Suppose (Px/Py)A < (Px/Py)B in autarky.
Identify the capital-abundant country and the labor-abundant country, respectively.
Use a PPF-indifference-curve graph to identify the autarky equilibrium for country B.
In the same graph, show country B's gains from trade when the two countries trade at a level of Px/Py that is between the two countries' autarky price ratios.
In the above graph, identify the trade triangle (including export and import quantities) for country B.
What would be the effect of trade on country B's relative nominal wage rate, i.e., the ratio of nominal wage rate relative to nominal capital rental rate (w/r)? Illustrate your answer graphically.
Your answer:
Assume that the world economy is composed of only two countries (Canada and the United States) and only two goods (steel and
wheat). The table below reports the units of steel or wheat per unit of labor in Canada and in the United States
Steel per
Wheat per
unit of labor
unit of labor
Canada
United States
9.
3
Suppose both the US and Canada have 10 units of labor. Use the joint PPF to answer the following: If the two countries are
producing 25 units of wheat, what is the opportunity cost of wheat? Hint: draw the PPF and ask what is the slope when 25 units are
being produced?
2.5
2.75
3
Chapter 16 Solutions
PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS(LOOSELEAF)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The diagram below shows a natural monopoly. If the firm is unregulated, how much deadweight loss will there be? 2$ 100 76 60 56 48 АТС 36 MC 20 MR 288 360 Q 84 144 180 204arrow_forwardJessica Alba, a famous actress, starts the baby and family products business, The Honest Company, with Christopher Gavigan. Alba and Gavigan set up their site so families can choose what kinds of non-toxic, all-natural products they'd like to use and get them in a bundle. Families can choose all kinds of products from food to hygiene necessities and cleaning supplies. Suppose they are thinking of expanding their business into five domestic markets: Phoenix, Dallas, Chicago, New York, and Atlanta. Assume their primary goal of business is to maximize economic profits, although they want to do business honestly.Show all your calculations and process. Describe your answer for each question in three- to five-complete sentences. You are a business adviser for Alba and Gavigan. Describe a skimming price and a penetration price, and advise them whether they should charge a skimming price or a penetration price, with supportive reasoning for and against each pricing alternative. Are they…arrow_forwardIf country A uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 100 units of good X. If country A uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 150 units of good Y. If country B uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 75 units of good X. If country B uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 125 units of good Y. Both countries have (linear) straight line PPFs. What is the opportunity cost of producing 50 units of Y in country B? (hint: your answer should be measured in the positive number of units of good X that must be given up - round your answer to two decimal places only if necessary)arrow_forward
- If country A uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 100 units of good X. If country A uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 150 units of good Y. If country B uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 75 units of good X. If country B uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 125 units of good Y. Both countries have (linear) straight line PPFs. If these countries were going to trade after specializing in their respective comparative advantages, which of the following trades would be considered to be mutually beneficial where BOTH countries gain from trade (and are strictly better off than in autarky, the situation where they both self-reliant and do not trade with one another)? trade at a rate of 3X for 4Y trade at a rate of 2X for 3Y trade at a rate of 5X for 8Y trade at a rate of 3X for 5Yarrow_forwardIf country A uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 100 units of good X. If country A uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 150 units of good Y. If country B uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 75 units of good X. If country B uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 125 units of good Y. Both countries have (linear) straight line PPFs. Which of the following must be true? (check all that apply) A and B have the same access to resources A has the absolute advantage in producing Y A has the absolute advantage in producing X B has the comparative advantage in producing Yarrow_forwardIf country A uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 100 units of good X. If country A uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 150 units of good Y. If country B uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 75 units of good X. If country B uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 125 units of good Y. Both countries have (linear) straight line PPFs. Which of the following must be true? check all that apply A and B have the same access to resources (inputs) A can produce more X than B with the same resources A can produce more Y than B could with the same resources B can produce Y at a lower opportunity cost than Aarrow_forward
- If country A uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 100 units of good X. If country A uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 150 units of good Y. If country B uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 75 units of good X. If country B uses all of its resources efficiently, it can produce a maximum of 125 units of good Y. Both countries have (linear) straight line PPFs. What is the opportunity cost of producing 10 units of X in country A? (hint: your answer should be measured in the positive number of units of good Y that must be given up - round your answer to two decimal places only if necessary)arrow_forwardWith its given resources, Nicaragua can produce either 20 thousand pounds of chicken or 80 thousand pounds of quinoa per year. Costa Rica can produce either 100 thousand pounds of chicken or 200 thousand pounds of quinoa per year. Suppose the countries completely specialize and they decide to trade 14 thousand pounds of chicken for 42 thousand pounds of quinoa. After trade, Nicaragua will consume thousand pounds of chicken and thousand pounds of quinoa. After trade, Costa Rica will consume thousand pournds of chicken and thousand pounds of quinoa. Round to the nearest whole number.arrow_forwardSuppose there are two countries, Home and Foreign, that produce two goods, fish (F) and edamame (E), using only labor. In the Home country 6 units of labor are required to produce each unit of fish and the same for each unit of edamame. In the Foreign country, 2 units of labor is required to produce each fish and 3 units of labor are required for each unit of edamame. Each country has a labor force of 30 units available for production. Suppose further that consumers in both countries have identical Leontief preferences, utility function U(CF, CE) = min(CF, CE), meaning that they want to consume the two goods in a fixed proportion of one-to-one, i.e. CF = CE (there is no substitution between the goods). Suppose now that the labor force of the Home country is 6 times as big (i.e. 180 units, instead of 30). How does this increase in labor force at Home change the pattern of trade? Will the gains from trade for the Home country be higher or lower now? What happens to the welfare of the…arrow_forward
- Suppose that in the country of England, two goods can be produced on available agricultural land: wine and wool. Suppose that the opportunity costs of production are constant, so that the PPF is a straight line. Further, when all resources are devoted to wine production, England can produce 200 (thousand) barrels. When all resources are devoted to wool production, England can produce 400 (thousand) bushels of wool. Suppose that a bushel of wool could be traded for a barrel of wine, one-for-one, on the international market. Draw a diagram illustrating the original situation, and this new situation, with wool on the X-axis and wine on the Y-axis.arrow_forwardCountry X and Country Y are neighbours. Both Country X and Country Y can produce two goods: food and clothing. In one week, Country X can produce 4,400 clothing units or 2,200 food units, or a mix of the two. In one week, Country Y can produce 5,000 clothing units or 2,000 food units, or a mix of the two. For both Country X and Country Y, their individual trade-offs between clothing units and food units are constant, regardless of how they allocate their time. Currently, Country X produces 2,400 clothing units and 1,000 food units per week while Country Y produces 2,500 clothing units and 1,000 food units per week. a. How is absolute advantage different from comparative advantage? b. Which country has the absolute advantage in food production? Which country has the absolute advantage in clothing production? Briefly explain.arrow_forwardpart C and D needed only Consider the Production Possibility Frontiers of two countries, Australia and Brazil. Assume both have linear PPFs and the two countries both produce the same two goods: fruits and grain. Given its resources, Australia can produce either 2 units of grain per day or 1 unit of fruits; Brazil can produce either 5 units of grain or 4 units of fruits. (You may, for your own use, find it helpful to draw the Production Possibilities Frontiers for each country, though these won't be included in the answers you provide in you online responses.) a. If there were no trade, what would be the local price of fruits in each country, measured in units of grain? b. If trade is allowed, which country will export fruits and which country will export grain (if any)? c. What are the gains from trading a unit of fruit if the international price of fruit is equal to the average of the local prices in the two countries? d. How are the gains from trade distributed? Comment…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education