“I know that it’s the thing to do,” insisted Pamela Kincaid, vice president of finance for Colgate Manufacturing. “If we are going to be competitive, we need to build this completely automated plant.”
“I’m not so sure,” replied Bill Thomas, CEO of Colgate. “The savings from labor reductions and increased productivity are only $4 million per year. The price tag for this factory—and it’s a small one—is $45 million. That gives a payback period of more than 11 years. That’s a long time to put the company’s money at risk.”
“Yeah, but you’re overlooking the savings that we’ll get from the increase in quality,” interjected John Simpson, production manager. “With this system, we can decrease our waste and our rework time significantly. Those savings are worth another million dollars per year.”
“Another million will only cut the payback to about 9 years,” retorted Bill. “Ron, you’re the marketing manager—do you have any insights?”
“Well, there are other factors to consider, such as service quality and market share. I think that increasing our product quality and improving our delivery service will make us a lot more competitive. I know for a fact that two of our competitors have decided against automation. That’ll give us a shot at their customers, provided our product is of higher quality and we can deliver it faster. I estimate that it’ll increase our net cash benefits by another $2.4 million.”
“Wow! Now that’s impressive,” Bill exclaimed, nearly convinced. “The payback is now getting down to a reasonable level.”
“I agree,” said Pamela, “but we do need to be sure that it’s a sound investment. I know that estimates for construction of the facility have gone as high as $48 million. I also know that the expected residual value, after the 20 years of service we expect to get, is $5 million. I think I had better see if this project can cover our 14% cost of capital.”
“Now wait a minute, Pamela,” Bill demanded. “You know that I usually insist on a 20%
Required:
- 1. Compute the
NPV of the project by using the original savings and investment figures. Calculate by using discount rates of 14% and 20%. Include salvage value in the computation. - 2. Compute the NPV of the project using the additional benefits noted by the production and marketing managers. Also, use the original cost estimate of $45 million. Again, calculate for both possible discount rates.
- 3. Compute the NPV of the project using all estimates of
cash flows , including the possible initial outlay of $48 million. Calculate by using discount rates of 14% and 20%. - 4. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION If you were making the decision, what would you do? Explain.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 12 Solutions
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Business Decision-Making
- At Stardust Gems, a faux gem and jewelry company, the setting department is a bottleneck. The company is considering hiring an extra worker, whose salary will be $67,000 per year, to ease the problem. Using the extra worker, the company will be able to produce and sell 9,000 more units per year. The selling price per unit is $20. The cost per unit currently is $15.85 as shown: What is the annual financial impact of hiring the extra worker for the bottleneck process?arrow_forwardBoxer Production, Inc., is in the process of considering a flexible manufacturing system that will help the company react more swiftly to customer needs. The controller, Mick Morrell, estimated that the system will have a 10-year life and a required return of 10% with a net present value of negative $500,000. Nevertheless, he acknowledges that he did not quantify the potential sales increases that might result from this improvement on the issue of on-time delivery, because it was too difficult to quantify. If there is a general agreement that qualitative factors may offer an additional net cash flow of $150,000 per year, how should Boxer proceed with this Investment?arrow_forwardArtisan Metalworks has a bottleneck in their production that occurs within the engraving department. Jamal Moore, the COO, is considering hiring an extra worker, whose salary will be $55,000 per year, to solve the problem. With this extra worker, the company could produce and sell 3,000 more units per year. Currently, the selling price per unit is $25 and the cost per unit is $7.85. Using the information provided, calculate the annual financial impact of hiring the extra worker.arrow_forward
- Hudson Corporation is considering three options for managing its data warehouse: continuing with its own staff, hiring an outside vendor to do the managing, or using a combination of its own staff and an outside vendor. The cost of the operation depends on future demand. The annual cost of each option (in thousands of dollars) depends on demand as follows: If the demand probabilities are 0.2, 0.5, and 0.3, which decision alternative will minimize the expected cost of the data warehouse? What is the expected annual cost associated with that recommendation? Construct a risk profile for the optimal decision in part (a). What is the probability of the cost exceeding $700,000?arrow_forwardBrandon Corporation, the maker of a variety of rubber products, is in the midst of a business downturn and has many idle facilities. Nationwide Tire Company has approached Brandon to produce 400,000 oversized tire tubes for $3.00 each. Brandon predicts that its variable costs will be $3.20 each. Its fixed costs, which had been averaging $2.50 per unit on a variety of products, will now be spread over twice as much volume. The president commented, “Sure we will lose $.20 each on the variable costs, but we will gain $1 per unit by spreading our fixed costs over more units. Therefore, we should take the offer because it would gain us $.80 per unit.” Brandon currently has a volume of 400,000 units, sales of $1,600,000, variable costs of $1,200,000, and fixed costs of $1,000,000. Required: Compute the impact on operating profit if the special order is accepted. Based on your calculations, explain why you agree or do not agree with the president. Would it be beneficial for Brandon to take a…arrow_forwardYou are a manager at Percolated Fiber, which is considering expanding its operations in synthetic fiber manufacturing. Your boss comes into your office, drops a consultant’s report on your desk, and complains, "We owe these consultants $1 million for this report, and I am not sure their analysis makes sense. Before we spend the $25 million on the new equipment needed for this project, look it over and give me your opinion." You open the report and find the following estimates (in thousands of dollars) for the project: Project year 1 2 … 9 10 Sales revenue 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 - Cost of goods sold 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 =Gross profit 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 - Gen, sales and admin expenses 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 - Depreciation 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 =Net operating income 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 - Income tax 2,625 2,625 2,625 2,625 =Net Income…arrow_forward
- We ought to stop making our own drums and accept that outside supplier’s offer,” said Wim Niewindt, managing director of Antilles Refining, N.V., of Aruba. “At a price of $20 per drum, we would be paying $5.25 less than it costs us to manufacture the drums in our own plant. Because we use 95,000 drums a year, that equals an annual cost savings of $498,750.” Antilles Refining’s current cost to manufacture one drum is given below (based on 95,000 drums per year): Direct materials $ 10.60 Direct labor 6.50 Variable overhead 1.50 Fixed overhead ($3.90 general company overhead, $1.55 depreciation, and $1.20 supervision) 6.65 Total cost per drum $ 25.25 A decision about whether to make or buy the drums is especially important at this time because the equipment used to make the drums is completely worn out and must be replaced. The choices facing the company are: Alternative 1: Rent new equipment and continue to make the drums. The equipment would be rented for $342,000 per…arrow_forwardThe management of Kimco is evaluating the possibility of replacing their large mainframe computer with a modern network system that requires much less office space. The network would cost $760,000 (including installation costs) and would save $150,000 per year in net cash flows (accounting for taxes and depreciation) in Year 1-2, $160,000 in year3-4, and $120,000 in year 5 due to efficiency gains. The current mainframe has a remaining book value of $160,000 and would be immediately sold for $120,000. Kimco’s discount rate is 10%, and its tax rate is 25%. Based on NPV, should management install the network system?arrow_forwardI’m not sure we should lay out $355,000 for that automated welding machine,” said Jim Alder, president of the Superior Equipment Company. “That’s a lot of money, and it would cost us $95,000 for software and installation, and another $61,200 per year just to maintain the thing. In addition, the manufacturer admits it would cost $58,000 more at the end of three years to replace worn-out parts.” “I admit it’s a lot of money,” said Franci Rogers, the controller. “But you know the turnover problem we’ve had with the welding crew. This machine would replace six welders at a cost savings of $125,000 per year. And we would save another $8,600 per year in reduced material waste. When you figure that the automated welder would last for six years, I’m sure the return would be greater than our 16% required rate of return.” “I’m still not convinced,” countered Mr. Alder. “We can only get $22,500 scrap value out of our old welding equipment if we sell it now, and in six years the new machine…arrow_forward
- You are a manager at Percolated Fiber, which is considering expanding its operations in synthetic fiber manufacturing. Your boss comes into your office, drops a consultant's report on your desk, and complains, "We owe these consultants $1.3 million for this report, and I am not sure their analysis makes sense. Before we spend the $22 million on new equipment needed for this project, look it over and give me your opinion." You open the report and find the following estimates (in millions of dollars): All of the estimates in the report seem correct. You note that the consultants used straight-line depreciation for the new equipment that will be purchased today (year 0), which is what the accounting department recommended. The report concludes that because the project will increase earnings by $5.472 million per year for ten years, the project is worth $54.72 million. You think back to your halcyon days in finance class and realize there is more work to be done! First,…arrow_forwardYou are a manager at Percolated Fiber, which is considering expanding its operations in synthetic fiber manufacturing. Your boss comes into your office, drops a consultant's report on your desk, and complains, "We owe these consultants $1.3 million for this report, and I am not sure their analysis makes sense. Before we spend the $22 million on new equipment needed for this project, look it over and give me your opinion." You open the report and find the following estimates (in millions of dollars): All of the estimates in the report seem correct. You note that the consultants used straight-line depreciation for the new equipment that will be purchased today (year 0), which is what the accounting department recommended. The report concludes that because the project will increase earnings by $5.472 million per year for ten years, the project is worth $54.72 million. You think back to your halcyon days in finance class and realize there is more work to be done! First,…arrow_forwardI am so confused on how to do this.... Get Hitched Inc. is a production company that is in the process of testing a strategic initiative aimed at increasing gross profit. The company’s current sales revenue is $1,200,000. Currently, the company’s gross profit is 35% of sales, but the company’s target gross profit percentage is 40%. The company’s current monthly cost of production is $780,000. Of this cost, 60% is for labor, 30% is for materials, and 10% is for overhead. The strategic initiative being tested at Get Hitched is a redesign of its production process that splits the process into two sequential procedures. The make up of the costs of production for Procedure 1 is currently 50% direct labor, 45% direct materials, and 5% overhead. The makeup of the costs of production for Procedure 2 is currently 55% direct labor, 25% direct materials, and 20% overhead. Company management estimates that Procedure 1 costs twice as much as Procedure 2. 1. Determine what the cost of labor,…arrow_forward
- Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax CollegeEssentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...StatisticsISBN:9781305627734Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. AndersonPublisher:Cengage Learning