Strict constructionism

Sort By:
Page 1 of 26 - About 253 essays
  • Decent Essays

    Strict Constructionism

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    and gained Cuba's independence, also called Cuban War of Independence. Moses, the pilgrims, and the Cubans all lost faith in the government and decided to fight for their rights same as the process of United States declaring independence. Strict constructionism is the people who wanted federal government to have more control of power as the

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    19th century the two dominant political parties, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists, had many opposing beliefs. With respect to the federal constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans were viewed as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad and lenient constructionism of the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans were supported by commoners and the middle class. In general, they favored limiting the power of the national government, they believed that farming should serve

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    the implied powers of the Constitution or that congress had the right to interpret the Constitution based on connotation. On the contrary, the Democratic-Republicans favored the protection of states’ rights and the strict containment of federal power. The Democratic-Republicans were strict constructionists and they

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sociology: Identifying Social Problems Essay

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    what the claimsmakers say about conditions, rather than the conditions themselves. [5] This examination will often take the form of case studies, in which sociologists will look at how a particular public issue is constructed. Constructionism is also interested in problem identification, or its perception and definition. Of interest is how certain conditions come to be defined as problems by certain groups, as this usually reflects an issue of power that this group stands to lose

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson Vs. Madison

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, Republicans, such as Jefferson were seen as strict constructionists of the Constitution while Federalists, like Madison, were generally looser with their interpretations of the Constitution's literal meaning. While the constructionist ideas were part of what separated the two parties from one another, Jefferson and Madison are both guilty of not adhering to these ideas on many occasions. Jefferson writes in a letter to Gideon Granger expressing

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    democratic nation. However as the democracy continued to grow, two opposing political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong state governments, a weak central government, and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. The Federalists saw it differently. They opted for a powerful central government with weaker state governments, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. The seemingly solid divide between Federalist and Republican

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court is made up of many justices that believe in two different judicial philosophies. These two philosophies are that of judicial activism and strict constructionism. These philosophies differ quite a bit from one another, but they both work toward the same main goal. Both philosophies play a part in court cases when it comes to deciding on a final ruling. Judicial activism is a judicial philosophy that states that a court has the right to, and should go beyond what is stated in the

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution was at first created to protect against racial discrimination, but the Supreme Court later expanded the clause to also providing equal treatment amongst different races. The clause says, “No state shall…deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws” (U.S. Constitution. Art./Amend. XIV, Sec. 1.) A person could not be discriminated upon solely because of his or her race and if the law treated a

    • 3764 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Memorandum of Oral Pleading Parties: Mr de Jong (Claimant) and Mini-Coza (Defendant) Date and time: Thursday 4th October 2012, 10:00hrs Judge: Mr. de Vries The Group: Pasi Lindqvist, Daan Bredenbeek, Nick Bruurmijn and Redmer van Berkum Overview of the Facts and the Compensation Sought On the 1st of January 2011 the claimant Mr. de Jong purchased a buggie through a German provider Mini-Coza, who operated in the Netherlands for €275. The buggie was to be used by the claimant’s over-one-year-old

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critical Thinking on Logical Issues Scenario 1 There is a lot of tragedy surrounding WV Steel Company lately. National Construction (our of Colorado) is building a new football stadium. The opt to buy and use cables that were approved by a contractor for WV Steel. After the stadium is built the upper deck collapses and injures and kills civilians watching the game. National is now under a lot of pressure from lawsuits stemming from the incident. To make matters worse Jessica crashes her car on

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
Previous
Page12345678926