Human papillomavirus

and food (which also includes water). With these three basic requirements met, a human can survive. However surviving and living one’s life fully as a human are separate things, and the question must be asked does the limitation of food to the bare minimum required to continue sustaining one’s body begin to also impinge on one’s humanity (which for the purposes of this paper will be defined as the entire human existence, physically, emotionally, and otherwise) in a more thorough way? Food is

The problem of suffering is not limited to human society. The awareness of evils, present not only in human society but also in the physical and biological levels, is raised among scientists and theologians who participate in theology-science dialogue. Not only animals but also plants experience sufferings and pains to a certain extent. On the physical level, the increase of entropy according to the 2nd law of thermodynamics is regarded as analogous to the notion of evil on the physical level.

Self-driving Cars: Good or Bad for humans Each generation, has given something to humanity, that the majority of us, thought was impossible, and no way is it going to happen. Some people believe that self-driving cars is good for the future and others think it will make us depend on technology too much. In all truth self-driving cars, has a lot of potential and unanswered questions: Google has been demonstrating its driverless technology over the past few years by bringing computerization into

be explained by science. Enter humans and you have free will and free thinking which can lead to actions and consequences. Free will gives way to moral consequences. Bad things happen to people because it is part of a greater cosmic roll of the dice. We have evolved and become higher functioning, deeper thinking, and longer living human beings. As the world societies grew so did destruction of our planet and the resources we have learned to wield from it. Humans are products of their environment

is terrifying to realize that the human population on Earth has reached over 7.3 billion people. This astonishing and constantly increasing amount of people threatens our planet’s limited resources. It is times like these that make me nostalgic for the feudal ages, where large populations of people were decimated by illnesses such as the plague. The advances in modern medicine today, while extremely impressive, are ultimately extremely detrimental to the human population as a whole because they

de-railed train blind to its surroundings. The oblivious projectile of a woman’s speed exponentially as it hurdled through space, the fetus inside her was always one step ahead and would remain that way for the rest of its life. The tawdry excuse of a human being, like a moth drawn to a flame, hurled into the lone man obstructing her demented path of destruction; she was destined for impact. As they came together they were bathed in the glorious morning light and as their eyes met they collided at the

social intuitionist model, which takes more variables, such as culture, into account, will affect how people feel about issues, help them to acquire new beliefs, and to help fight one’s ingrained, societal ethics. He enforced the belief that we, as human beings, need both rational, logical thought, and emotional intuition. We are not simply made of one or the other, nor can we separate the two. Haidt likens the relationship between logic and morality to a dog wagging its tail. He believes that “reasoning

Conflicts arise everyday regarding people feeling differently from how I feel, or how everyone else feels. This in my opinion is a fact of life. No one is always going to like you, no one is always going to agree with what you do or say. As a human being, one must however, not outright offend others, this is how you go around this conflict. As long as I am respecting others, being honest as best I can, taking all responsibilities that are mine and following thru with them, am fair to others and

What does it truly mean to have human consciousness? In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the exploration of this question, acts as an overarching theme throughout the novel. Starting from the creation of Dr. Frankenstein’s monster in chapter V of the story, Frankenstein himself has to come to terms with the fact that he truly believes he has created a monster, and the creature itself has to begin to understand why he has this label of a "monster," even after he begins to see the humanity within himself

have something to do with our advancements in technology, and how we should use moral components such as compassion when we make a new development or technology. New technology such as cloning, genetic plant modification, and changing the DNA of a human embryo in order to get the " ideal" baby can have some long lasting effects on us, because each and everyone of them has some sort of potential dangers of their technologies. When we apply these technologies we should let our moral compass decide if