The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781305967304
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 7, Problem 3CT
Summary Introduction
Case summary:A person D was employed in the company N. The person D, while working on a forklift, moved out of the seat and unintendedly stepped on vehicle’s active gearshift. Due to this, the forklift moved backward causing injuries to the person D. A lawsuit was filed by the person D against the manufacturer of forklift M and the company N, claiming under product liability. The manufacturer M in defense stated that the company N altered the vehicle after delivery and disabled the security switch. The security switch was installed to prevent accidents caused by sudden use of an active gearshift.
To Find: The person D’s success in an action against the company N.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
S insured his appliance store under an owner, landlords, and tenant’s policy that included products liability coverage. While he was demonstrating a microwave oven the door came open and injured a customer. Which of the following would protect S?
The oven manufacture’s products liability policy
The premises-operation section on S’s policy
The products Liability section on S’s policy
The incidental contracts section of S’s policy
Susan owns and operate a food processing factory in New Territories Hong Kong. Susan bought worker’s compensation and employer’s liability policy to protect herself for workers job related-injury or occupational disease. Explain whether the following situation are covered under this policy.
A customer entered Susan’s factory and was hurt by a box in the factory.
An employee died accidentally because of the machine failure in Susan’s factory.
In the Silvestri v. Optus Software, Inc. case, the
employment contract contained a 2-year
employment agreement with a satisfaction clause.
Which of the following was held?
A. The satisfaction clause was not enforced,
because it was a restraint on trade.
B. The satisfaction clause was not enforced,
because it was subjective.
C. The employer breached the contract and had to
pay damages.
D. The termination of employment before the 2-
year period was enforced.
Chapter 7 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- What is the principle of vicarious liability (respondeat superior)?arrow_forwardThe insured is covered under O.A.P. 1 Owner’s Policy including Direct Compensation-Property Damage and is involved in an accident in Ontario with an automobile, for which he/she is not at fault. His/her car is severely damaged and personal belongings in the car are destroyed. Which one (1) of the following statements is correct? O A) Damage to the insured's car and reimbursement for a rental vehicle are covered by the third party’s policy. O B) Damage to the insured’s car, replacement of destroyed personal belongings and reimbursement for a rental vehicle are covered by the insured’s policy, less the policy deductible. O C) Damage to the insured’s car, replacement of destroyed personal belongings and reimbursement for a rental vehicle are covered by the third party's policy. O D) Only damage to the insured’s car and reimbursement for a rental vehicle are covered by the insured's policy.arrow_forwardExplain Family and Medical Leave Act (1993).arrow_forward
- After meeting with a supervisee, the supervisor believes that one of the supervisee’s clients is in danger of harming herself. The supervisee disagrees, he believes that the client is not at risk and decides not to take any action, despite requests by the supervisor. The supervisor decides to contact the client herself and makes arrangements to have her committed to a psychiatric unit. Has the supervisee acted ethically? Professionally? Has the supervisor acted ethically? Professionally?arrow_forwardTo win a suit for negligence, injured person must show all but one: Select one: O a. The company s behavior was the proxmate cause of the plaintiff s injuries. O b. The company creates an unreasonable risk of harm. O c. The company acted with total care and respect to the harm that could result O d. The company broke its duty of care,arrow_forwardLiability of a manufacturer, seller, or supplier to a buyer or other third party for injuries sustained because of a defect in a product is known as? A crime. Tort per se. An intentional tort. Products liability.arrow_forward
- The manager of Palms Restaurant assembles all employees and announces that because theft isoccurring, she would fire employees until the guilty party confessed. Turning to an employee, Alice, themanager says, "You're fired." Palms Restaurant is in an employment-at-will state. Discuss if Alice has anylegal remedy against Palms.arrow_forwardIn a legal brief on negligence the following statement was made: "Where negligence can be established, it is no defense that the negligent action was in full compliance with all government regulations and permit conditions." Explain why this defense may not be valid.arrow_forwardReaction to discussion below: Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. was a tenant in a building where alarm systems were maintained by the ADT company. When the systems were defective and allowed water into the building, it damaged Melodee’s property; Then Melodee decided to sue ADT and their defense was that the service contract limited the liability to 10% of the annual service charge given to the customers. The limitation can be valid since the ADT company did not provide much liability protection. The ADT company can offer another protection plan to Melodee, which would cover her property but at a higher price rate. This case limitation of liability clauses will be enacted since ADT company was not fully liable for Melodee's property, which only would cover the limited 10%. A limitation of liability clauses contract states that one of the parties is not fully liable for damages in case of a breach. The ADT company is at fault for the malfunctions in their systems they should offer a higher…arrow_forward
- Olga, a resident of Maine, was recently injured by a defective product produced by Home Appliance Corporation, which is incorporated in Delaware but has its company headquarters in Virgina. Olga purchased the defective product in Maine. Olga is suing Home Appliance for $60,000. Which courts would have personal jurisdiction in this case? Would a federal court have jurisdiction? Why or why not?arrow_forwardA Board of directors had been experiencing a growing divide between its members for some months and one of the directors sought legal advice independently regarding a possible case for harassment and bullying. The Board's solicitor had been trying to steer them through this difficult period but advised that proceedings were imminent and that urgent action needed to be taken to protect the organisation. The remaining members of the board were unable to agree on a way forward and the director who threatened to sue continued to attend meetings so that they became completely ineffective. They became anxious about speaking on the record and were reluctant to permeated every The Board's solicitor suggested mediation, reminding the Board of their obligation to run the organisation as effectively as possible and that mediation is something the Charity Commission favours. tackle the obvious conflict that meeting. The two solicitors agreed to appoint a mediator and the board members engaged in a…arrow_forwardJohn Campbell, an employee of Manhattan Construction Company, claims to have injured his back as a result of a fall while repairing the roof at one of the Eastview apartment buildings. He filed a lawsuit against Doug Reynolds, the owner of Eastview Apartments, asking for damages of $1,500,000. John claims that the roof had rotten sections and that his fall could have been prevented if Mr. Reynolds had told Manhattan Construction about the problem. Mr. Reynolds notified his insurance company, Allied Insurance, of the lawsuit. Allied must defend Mr. Reynolds and decide what action to take regarding the lawsuit.Some depositions and a series of discussions took place between both sides. As a result, John Campbell offered to accept a settlement of $750,000. Thus, one option is for Allied to pay John $750,000 to settle the claim. Allied is also considering making John a counteroffer of $400,000 in the hope that he will accept a lesser amount to avoid the time and cost of going to trial.…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education