Concept explainers
a)
To determine: The
Introduction:
IRR helps to make capital-budget decisions. IRR relies on the
b)
To determine: Whether the IRR rule can be applied for the decision.
Introduction:
IRR helps to make capital-budget decisions. IRR relies on the cash inflows and outflows of the project, instead of the external data. The project should be accepted if the IRR of the project exceeds a hurdle rate.
c)
To determine: The cost of capital for which forgoing maintenance would be a good decision.
Introduction:
IRR helps to make capital-budget decisions. IRR relies on the cash inflows and outflows of the project, instead of the external data. The project should be accepted if the IRR of the project exceeds a hurdle rate.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 7 Solutions
Corporate Finance (4th Edition) (Pearson Series in Finance) - Standalone book
- Although the Chen Company’s milling machine is old, it is still in relatively good working order and would last for another 10 years. It is inefficient compared to modern standards, though, and so the company is considering replacing it. The new milling machine, at a cost of $110,000 delivered and installed, would also last for 10 years and would produce after-tax cash flows (labor savings and depreciation tax savings) of $19,000 per year. It would have zero salvage value at the end of its life. The project cost of capital is 10%, and its marginal tax rate is 25%. Should Chen buy the new machine?arrow_forwardFriedman Company is considering installing a new IT system. The cost of the new system is estimated to be 2,250,000, but it would produce after-tax savings of 450,000 per year in labor costs. The estimated life of the new system is 10 years, with no salvage value expected. Intrigued by the possibility of saving 450,000 per year and having a more reliable information system, the president of Friedman has asked for an analysis of the projects economic viability. All capital projects are required to earn at least the firms cost of capital, which is 12 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the projects internal rate of return. Should the company acquire the new IT system? 2. Suppose that savings are less than claimed. Calculate the minimum annual cash savings that must be realized for the project to earn a rate equal to the firms cost of capital. Comment on the safety margin that exists, if any. 3. Suppose that the life of the IT system is overestimated by two years. Repeat Requirements 1 and 2 under this assumption. Comment on the usefulness of this information.arrow_forwardTalbot Industries is considering launching a new product. The new manufacturing equipment will cost 17 million, and production and sales will require an initial 5 million investment in net operating working capital. The companys tax rate is 40%. a. What is the initial investment outlay? b. The company spent and expensed 150,000 on research related to the new product last year. Would this change your answer? Explain. c. Rather than build a new manufacturing facility, the company plans to install the equipment in a building it owns but is not now using. The building could be sold for 1.5 million after taxes and real estate commissions. How would this affect your answer?arrow_forward
- Talbot Industries is considering launching a new product. The new manufacturing equipment will cost $17 million, and production and sales will require an initial $5 million investment in net operating working capital. The company’s tax rate is 25%. What is the initial investment outlay? The company spent and expensed $150,000 on research related to the new product last year. What is the initial investment outlay? Rather than build a new manufacturing facility, the company plans to install the equipment in a building it owns but is not now using. The building could be sold for $1.5 million after taxes and real estate commissions. What is the initial investment outlay?arrow_forwardYour firm spends $447,000 per year in regular maintenance of its equipment. Due to the economic downturn, the firm considers forgoing these maintenance expenses for the next 3 years. If it does so, it expects it will need to spend $1.9 million in year 4 replacing failed equipment. a. What is the IRR of the decision to forgo maintenance of the equipment? b. Does the IRR rule work for this decision? c. For what costs of capital (COC) is forgoing maintenance a good decision?arrow_forwardYour firm spends $474,000 per year in regular maintenance of its equipment. Due to the economic downturn, the firm considers forgoing these maintenance expenses for the next 3 years. If it does so, it expects it will need to spend $1.8 million in year 4 replacing failed equipment. a. What is the IRR of the decision to forgo maintenance of the equipment? b. Does the IRR rule work for this decision? c. For what costs of capital (COC) is forgoing maintenance a good decision? a. What is the IRR of the decision to forgo maintenance of the equipment? The IRR of the decision is _________________ (Round to two decimal places.)arrow_forward
- Your firm spends $600,000 per year (end of the year payment) in regular maintenance of its equipment. Due to the COVID-19 economic downturn, the firm considers forgoing these maintenance expenses for the next three years. If it does so, it expects it will need to spend $2.7 million in year 4 (end of the year payment) replacing failed equipment. Can IRR be applied in this decision? Answer For what MARR is forgoing maintenance a good decision?arrow_forwardYour firm spends $800,000 per year (end of the year payment) in regular maintenance of its equipment. Due to the COVID-19 economic downturn, the firm considers forgoing these maintenance expenses for the next three years. If it does so, it expects it will need to spend $3 million in year 4 (end of the year payment) replacing failed equipment. Does the IRR rule work for this decision?, For what MARR is forgoing maintenance a good decision? a. IRR rule does not work, Positive NPW only if MARR >11.58% O b. IRR rule works, Positive NPW only if MARR> 11.58% O c. IRR rule works, Positive NPW only if MARR < 11.58% O d. IRR rule does not work, Positive NPW only if MARR < 11.58%arrow_forwardA construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing an additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 12%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with and without mitigation. Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation?arrow_forward
- Your firm spends $509,000 per year in regular maintenance of its equipment. Due to the economic downturn, the firm considers forgoing these maintenance expenses for the next 3 years. If it does so, it expects it will need to spend $1.9 million in year 4 replacing failed equipment. For what costs of capital (COC) is forgoing maintenance a good decision? O When cost of capital 8% O When cost of capital > 11%arrow_forwardA construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 12%. Calculate the NPV with and without mitigation. Show the workingsarrow_forwardA construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 12%. Calulate the Payback with and without mitgationwhat is the discounted payback with and without mitigation?Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation? (hint: discuss all the criterias you have calculated in earlier parts)How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluatedarrow_forward
- Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage LearningEBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
- Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning