Suppose a new process was developed that could be used to make oil out of seawater. The equipment required is quite expensive; but it would, in time, lead to low prices for gasoline, electricity, and other types of energy. What effect would this have on interest rates?View Solution: Suppose a new process was developed that could be used

Suppose a new process was developed that could be used to make oil out of seawater. The equipment required is quite expensive; but it would, in time, lead to low prices for gasoline, electricity, and other types of energy. What effect would this have on interest rates?View Solution: Suppose a new process was developed that could be used

International Financial Management

14th Edition

ISBN:9780357130698

Author:Madura

Publisher:Madura

Chapter9: Forecasting Exchange Rates

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6ST

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

1. what amount should be used as the initial cash flow for this project and why?? 2. What is the after-tax salvage value for the spectrometer? 3. What is the MPV of the project? Should the firm accept or reject this project?
2.When comparing two projects with different lives, why do you compute an annuity with an equivalent present value (PV) to the net present value (NPV)? A. so that you can see which project has the greatest net present value (NPV) B. to reduce the danger that changes in the estimate of the discount rate will lead to choosing the project with a shorter timeframe C. to ensure that cash flows from the project with a longer life that occur after the project with the shorter life has ended are considered D. so that the projects can be compared on their cost or value created per year
Which of the following would cause a project to have a lower net present value, thereby making the project less appealing? A. The discount rate increases B. The cash flows are extended over a longer period of time. C. The investment cost decreases without affecting the expected income and life of the project. d. The cash flows are accelerated and the project life is correspondingly shortened.
4. Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project's IRR. Consider the following situation: Grey Fox Aviation Company is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $3,225,000. The project's expected cash flows are: Year Cash Flow Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Grey Fox Aviation Company's WACC is 8%, and the project has the same risk as the firm's average project. Calculate this project's modified internal rate of return (MIRR): 16.25% 13.69% $325,000 -150,000 450,000 475,000 14.54% -20.05% If Grey Fox Aviation Company's managers select projects based on the MIRR criterion, they should Which of the following statements about the relationship between the IRR and the MIRR is…
Ehrmann Data Systems is considering a project that has the following cash flow and WACC data. What is the project's MIRR? Note that a project's projected MIRR can be less than the WACC (and even negative), in which case it will be rejected.
4. Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project’s IRR. Consider the following situation: Grey Fox Aviation Company is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $450,000. The project’s expected cash flows are: Year Cash Flow Year 1 $300,000 Year 2 –175,000 Year 3 475,000 Year 4 450,000 Grey Fox Aviation Company’s WACC is 10%, and the project has the same risk as the firm’s average project. Calculate this project’s modified internal rate of return (MIRR): 26.73% 27.89% 20.92% 23.24% If Grey Fox Aviation Company’s managers select projects based on the MIRR criterion, they shouldreject this independent…
WorldTrans is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the shorter payback, some value may be forgone. How much value will be lost in this instance? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the shorter payback will not cause value to be lost. WACC: 14.25% 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$950 $500 $800 $0 $0 CFL -$2,100 $400 $800 $800 $1,000 Group of answer choices $127.87 $95.90 $93.62 $116.46 $0.00
1. Desai Industries is analyzing an average-risk project, and the following data have been developed. Unit sales will be constant, but the sales price should increase with inflation. Fixed costs will also be constant, but variable costs should rise with inflation. The project should last for 3 years, it will be depreciated on a straight-line basis, and there will be no salvage value. No change in net operating working capital would be required. This is just one of many projects for the firm, so any losses on this project can be used to offset gains on other firm projects. What is the project's expected NPV? Do not round the intermediate calculations and round the final answer to the nearest whole number. WACC 10.0% Net investment cost (depreciable basis) Units sold $200,000 40,000 $25.00 Average price per unit, Year 1 Fixed op. cost excl. depr. (constant) Variable op. cost/unit, Year 1 Annual depreciation rate Expected inflation rate per year Tax rate $150,000 $20.20 33.333% 5.00%…
Basic NPV methods tell us that the value of a project today is NPV0. Time value of money issues also lead us to believe that if we choose not to do the project that it will be worth NPV1 one period from now, such that NPV0 > NPV1. Why then do we see some firms choosing to defer taking on a project. Be complete and thorough in your answer.
Yonan Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the shorter payback, some value may be forgone. How much value will be lost in this instance? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the shorter payback will not cause value to be lost. WACC: 14.25% 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$950 $500 $800 $0 $0 CFL -$2,100 $400 $800 $800 $1,000 G $93.62 $95.90 $127.87 $0.00 $116.46
TLT Ltd is considering the purchase of a new machine for use in its production process. Management has developed three alternative proposals to help evaluate the machine purchase. Only one of these proposals can be implemented. Proposals A and B both have the same cost to set up, but the output from proposal A (as measured by future net cash flows) commences at a high rate and then declines over time, while Proposal B starts at a low rate and then increases over time. Proposal C involves buying two of the machines considered under proposal B. That is, proposal C is simply Proposal B scaled by a factor of two. Proposal C results in net cash flows which are similar in magnitude to proposal A's net cash flows in the first two years. The estimated net cash flows, internal rates of return and net present values at 9% and 11% for each proposal are given in the following table. Proposal A -$290,000 $100,000 $90,000 Proposal B -$290,000 $40,000 $50,000 Proposal C -$580,000 $80,000 $100,000 End…
Basic NPV methods tell us that the value of a project today is NPV0. Time value of money issues also lead us to believe that if we choose not to do the project that it will be worth NPV1 one period from now, such that NPV0 > NPV1. Why then do we see some firms choosing to defer taking on a project?