Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094757
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 6, Problem 1TS
Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person O was in a hardware area of a department store and he took a pair of wrenches and concealed them into his clothes. This act by person O was noticed by the security guard. After this act person O looked once again and walked towards the exit by passing through many counters. Finally, the guard stopped person O near the exit.

To discuss: The arguments that supports the prosecutor in finding person O guilty of larceny.

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
Olivo was in the hardware area of a department store. A security guard saw him look around, take a set of wrenches, and conceal it in his clothing. Olivo looked around once more and proceeded toward an exit, passing several cash registers. The guard stopped him short of the exit. a. What argument would support the prosecutor in finding Olivo guilty of larceny? b. What argument would you make as Olivio’s defense counsel for finding him not guilty of larceny? c. Which side’s argument do you find most convincing? Explain.
Upton is a used car salesman in Athens, Georgia. He often tries to scam (defraud, cheat, bilk, fool, etc.) his customers while he acts as an agent on behalf of his boss, Klaus. As part of Upton's agency duty, he is explicitly instructed by Klaus to deliver one of the cars currently on their sales lot in Athens to one of their other locations in Inglewood, California, on Klaus's behalf. The trip is a little over 2000 miles long and will take several days of driving to complete. Upton understands that the assignment is time-sensitive and must be completed within the current week. Despite this knowledge, he proceeds to go several hundred miles off his instructed route and make a pit stop in Boulder, Colorado. While there, he parties for two whole days and goes on a drunken rampage, destroying dozens of mailboxes in a quiet residential neighborhood with the very car he was told to deliver. Eventually, Upton finishes the remainder of his trip as originally planned and delivers the car, but…
John Beck was injured at the Drive-Thru at Taco Bell when an impatient driver behind him fired his gun at John’s car. When would Taco Bell be liable for John’s injuries?   a.  ​Taco Bell would be liable if John was negligent.   b.  ​Taco Bell is always liable for John’s injuries because he is an invitee.   c.  ​Taco Bell could never be liable for John’s injuries.   d.  ​Taco Bell would be liable if the firing of the shot was foreseeable.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Text book image
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON