Microeconomics (6th Edition)
6th Edition
ISBN: 9780134106243
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 5.3.9PA
Sub part (a):
To determine
Mortality effect of obesity.
Sub part (b):
To determine
Whether the tax should be on soda or on cigarette.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
John Cassidy, a writer for the New Yorker magazine, wrote a blog post arguing against New York City’s having installed bike lanes. Cassidy complained that the bike lanes had eliminated traffic lanes on some streets as well as some on-street parking. A writer for the Economist magazine disputed Cassidy’s argument with the following comment: “I hate to belabor the point, but driving, as it turns out, is associated with a number of negative externalities.” What externalities are associated with driving? How do these externalities affect the debate over whether big cities should install more bike lanes?
J. Cassidy. Battle of the Bike Lanes. New Yorker, March 8, 2011. The World Is His Parking Spot. Economist, March 9, 2011. Initial Response should be at least 250 words and should include at least one reference in APA format. The Peer Response should be at least 100 words and add value.
Briefly explain what is meant by the term "externality" and how it occurs.
a. What are the two types of externalities?
b.How does government fix both of these issues?
c. Is government intervention necessary? Why or why not?
Economists Kenneth Chay and Michael Greenstone found that in the two years following the passage of the Clean Air Act of 1970, the sharp reduction in air pollution also led to a decline in infant deaths. Although this and other studies provide compelling evidence of the link between pollution and infant health, it is not clear that reductions from the much lower levels of ambient pollution today would have the same effect. Which of the following reasons could explain this?
A.
Today, the level of pollution is much higher. Therefore, it will take a much larger reduction in air pollution to reap benefits similar to those in 1970.
B.
When levels of pollution are high, the marginal benefit of reducing pollution also is high. It follows therefore that the benefit of reducing air pollution in 1970 would be much higher than the benefit from a proportional reduction in air pollution today when the level of pollution is much lower.
C.
When levels of pollution are…
Chapter 5 Solutions
Microeconomics (6th Edition)
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.10PA
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.14PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.15PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.16PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.12PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- From CNN what news article represents an issue ragards to Externalities or that can be realted to externalities? Cite at least one source (News Article, Video, etc.) for any data. Explain: What is the Economic issue? (Describe the issue) What is the connection to Externalities? (positive, negative, policy) (Use Math, Graph or data to explain or support your idea) Explain how this affects the Economy (individual, industry, national or global)arrow_forwardWhich of the following illustrates the concept of externalaties? A. A hurricane destroys a production plant causing the owner of the plant to spend more money rebuilding B. Pollution by a coal mining plant causes a farmer to spend more money on fertilizer to improve his crop C. Increase in the price of sugar raises the price paid by consumers of soda, thereby disadvantaging these consumers D. Smoking harms the health of the smokerarrow_forwardPlease answer fastarrow_forward
- Economists define the efficient amount of fund pollutants as the amount that minimizes the sum of damage and control costs. Using this definition, they derive two general rules, one of which is that the efficient level of pollution is not generally zero. Briefly explain why this is true.arrow_forwardwhat is an externality? give an example of a postiive externality and an example of negative externalityarrow_forwardBriefly explain what is meant by the term "externality" and how it occurs. What are some ways (name at least 2) in which a negative externality can be corrected?arrow_forward
- There are three identical firms in Happy Valley. Firms Initial Pollution Level Cost of Reducing Pollution by 1 unit A 30 units $20 B 40 units $30 C 20 units $10 The government wants to reduce total pollution to 60 units, so it gives each firm 20 tradable permits. Who sells permits and how many do they sell? Who buys permits and how many do they buy? Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are each willing to do so? What is the total cost of pollution reduction in this situation? How much larger would the cost of pollution reduction be if the permits could not be traded?arrow_forwardQuestion 3 Professor Paudel shows the graph for the case of negative externalities in the class. He wants the class to think about positive externalities as well. This got him thinking a lot about potential market failure due to positive production externality in the oil exploration market. Specifically, in his research, he found that expenditures on oil exploration by any company can have a positive externality because they offer more profitable opportunities for other companies. Professor Paudel wants you to enlighten him on the following issues: a) Graphically show private and social marginal cost functions and the demand curve. b) Under positive externalities as mentioned above, is the social marginal cost below than the private marginal cost? Explain and support your answers with the help of a clearly labeled graph. c) Under positive externalities as mentioned above, what's the relationship between social optimum quantity and the competitive market equilibrium quantity? Is there…arrow_forwardYou read the following from an article on WebMD: "Spending on health care is out of control, and the reasons are that drug companies are exploiting their monopoly positions to raise prices, and doctors are ordering lots of unnecessary tests to protect themselves from lawsuits." What do you think about this quote? Select one: a. These reasons have nothing to do with spending on health care, which is driven mainly by government regulations. O b. It is probably true. Drug companies and doctors actually do those things. O c. It is probably false because drug companies are highly competitive and doctors don't care about lawsuits. O d. It is probably false. These actions could raise prices, but they won't necessarily raise spending.arrow_forward
- The image upload answer is not allowed pleasearrow_forwardSuppose you are told that electronic cigarettes cause health problems such as depression and problems with arteries. You also are told that electronic cigarettes do NOT produce second-hand smoke, meaning that e-smoking (called "vaping") by one person does not harm a person standing nearby. How might economists respond? A standard welfare economist would say that e-smoking imposes an externality if health insurance is pooled and a. premiums are shared. A standard welfare economist would say that e-smoking does not increase social costs, unless having health O b. insurance makes people more likely to use electronic cigarettes. A behavioral economics would ask if people who use e-cigarettes become addicted. C. All of the above. d.arrow_forwardcome up with your own example of positive externality and then another example of negative externality. Briefly explain why they can be considered externalities.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, IncPrinciples of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971493Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781305156050
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337091992
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305971493
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning