Auditing and Assurance Services (16th Edition)
16th Edition
ISBN: 9780134065823
Author: Alvin A. Arens, Randal J. Elder, Mark S. Beasley, Chris E. Hogan
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 16.3MCQ
To determine
Identify the correct option according to the statement given.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
In a common law action against an accountant, lack of privity is a viable defense ifthe plaintiff(1) is the client’s creditor who sues the accountant for negligence.(2) can prove the presence of gross negligence that amounts to a reckless disregardfor the truth.(3) is the accountant’s client.(4) bases the action upon fraud.
Under common law, which of the following statements most accurately reflects the liability of a CPA who fraudulently gives an opinion on an audit of a client's financial statements?
A. The CPA is liable only to third parties in privity of contract with the CPA
B. The CPA is liable only to known users of the financial statements
C. The CPA probably is liable to any person who suffered a loss as a result of the fraud
D. The CPA probably is liable to the client even if the client was aware of the fraud and did not rely on the opinion
Auditors may be held liable to both their clients and third parties under common law.
a. What must a client prove to recover its losses from the auditors under common law?
b. In a court that adheres to the precedent set by the Ultramares v. Touche case, what must an ordinary third party prove to recover losses from the auditors under common law
Chapter 5 Solutions
Auditing and Assurance Services (16th Edition)
Ch. 5 - Prob. 1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 6RQCh. 5 - Prob. 7RQCh. 5 - Prob. 8RQCh. 5 - Prob. 9RQCh. 5 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 5 - What potential sanctions does the SEC have against...Ch. 5 - Prob. 12RQCh. 5 - Prob. 13RQCh. 5 - Prob. 14.1MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 14.2MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 14.3MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 15.1MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 15.2MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 15.3MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 16.1MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 16.2MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 16.3MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 17DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 18DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 19DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 20DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 21DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 22DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 23DQPCh. 5 - Under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 and...Ch. 5 - Prob. 25DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 26DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 27C
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- What does a third-party user of financial statements have to prove under common law in a suit against an auditor for the auditor's negligence?arrow_forwardIf either party fails to perform their contractual obligations according to the contract terms, it will usually result in a breach of contract. The scope and nature of an auditor's contractual obligation to a client ordinarily is established in the: Select one: a. Corporations Act 2001. b. Management letter. c. Client’s constitution. d. Engagement letter.arrow_forwardWhat does a third-party user of financial statements have to prove under common law in a suit against an auditor for the auditor's negligence? Explain each item with an examplearrow_forward
- A number of cases have considered the auditor’s liability in relation to persons other than the immediate client. Even so, the AWA case established that: Select one: a. Duty of care and skill means following the accounting standards b.auditors have a contractual duty to oversee and review the work of inexperienced audit staff c.Auditors are only liable for the proportion of damages attributable to their actions d.Auditors have a duty of care only to the shareholders.arrow_forwardEach of the following situations involves a possible violation ofthe AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. For each situation, state the applicable section ofthe rules of conduct and whether it is a violation.a. Emrich, CPA, provides tax services, management advisory services, and bookkeepingservices and also conducts audits for the same nonpublic client. Because the firm issmall, the same person often provides all the services.b. Franz Marteens is a CPA, but not a partner, with 3 years of professional experiencewith Roberts and Batchelor, CPAs. He owns 25 shares of stock in an audit client ofthe firm, but he does not take part in the audit of the client, and the amount of stockis not material in relation to his total wealth.c. A nonaudit client requests assistance of M. Wilkenson, CPA, in the installationof a local area network. Wilkenson had no experience in this type of work andno knowledge of the client’s computer system, so he obtained assistance from acomputer consultant. The…arrow_forwardIndividuals who believe they relied on misstated financial statements to make a decision andhave suffered losses as a result will issue an action known as aa. Breach of contract.b. Tort.c. Securities litigation.d. Constructive fraud.arrow_forward
- Which statement about the SEC independence rules on bookkeeping services is not accurate? a) Bookkeeping services are prohibited even if the client approves the books and records as the services are performed. b) Bookkeeping services are permitted if the individuals performing these services perform no other services. c) Bookkeeping services are prohibited in most circumstances under the SEC's independence rules. d) Bookkeeping services are prohibited even if the fees from these services are less than the audit fee.arrow_forwardWhat kind of actions might customers pursue against auditors under the common law doctrine of restitution? In each situation, what evidence do clients need to provide before filing a lawsuit?arrow_forwardWhen a CPA knows that a tax client has skimmed cash receipts and not reported the incomein the federal income tax return but signs the return as a CPA who prepared the return, theCPA has violated which of the following AICPA rules of conduct?a. The Confidential Client Information Rule.b. The Integrity and Objectivity Rule.c. The Independence Rule.d. The Accounting Principles Rulearrow_forward
- am. 27.arrow_forwardEe.56.arrow_forwardCulpa aquiliana as distinguished from culpa contractual: Proof of due diligence in the selection and supervision of employees is not considered a defense. Proof of the contract and its breach is sufficient to warrant recovery. The negligence of the defendant is only an incident in the performance of the obligation. The source of liability is the negligent act of the person causing damage to another.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:CengageAuditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College PubBusiness Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:Cengage
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337485913
Author:BROOKS
Publisher:Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:9781305224414
Author:JENNINGS
Publisher:Cengage