Labor Economics
7th Edition
ISBN: 9780078021886
Author: George J Borjas
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 11P
(a)
To determine
Graphically illustrate the indifference curves.
(b)
To determine
Graphically illustrate the indifference curves.
(c)
To determine
Determine the impact of government campaign on indifference curve.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose that there are 2 types of plans available to you.
Plan A has a deductible of $500, with 10 percent co-insurance rate for many health care services.
Plan B has a deductible fo $1000, with 35 percent co-insurance rate.
Plan A costs $200 per month in premiums while Plan B costs $80.
Discuss characteristics of people who would choose Plan A versus Plan B. Assuming that both plan types exist in the market, who would likely choose Plan B over Plan A? What plan would you choose?
how satiation point is helpful in deriving indifference curve ?
1) Consider observable effort. Assume that if the Agent does not accept the wage the
Principal offers his outside option gives him a net utility of v =2. The probability of
high profit under e=1 is %, the probability of high profit under low effort is 1/4.
Calculate the minimum wage that the agent will accept to work and supply the asked
effort when the Principal asks him to supply e=0, and e=1. Let us call these wages
wo and wi. Now, assume that instead of offering him a flat wage, the Principal is
offering the agent a wage schedule (, w) where the agent receives when the
(gross) profit is High and w when the (gross) profit is low. Calculate all the lowest
cost wage schedules the agent will accept to supply e=1, and e=D0. Does the
principal's expected net profit change when he pays the minimum cost wage
schedule instead of the flat wage minimum cost wage? Explain the intuition for your
answer.
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Elena applies for private insurance and resents the number of questions asked on the application. She states that since the primary contribution of insurance companies is to pool the risk of many individuals, they should care less about the characteristics of any one applicant and more about increasing the number of the patients that they insure. Furthermore, she states, when she had insurance through her employer, she hardly had to answer any questions. Use economic reasoning to explain to Elena the insurance company's behaviorarrow_forward2) Explain how utility could be used in a decision where performance is not measuredby monetary value.arrow_forwardDraw a utility function (with income on the horizontal axis) for an individual who is risk-loving at low levels of income, risk-neutral at moderate levels of income, and risk-averse at high levels of income (with each of these three regions clearly labeled). How would someone who looked at this graph (and had no other information about the individual) be able to figure out the individual’s attitude toward risk (averse/loving/neutral) in each region?arrow_forward
- Tess and Lex earn $40,000 per year and all earnings are spent on consumption (c). Tess and Lex both have the utility function c. Both could experience an adverse event that results in earnings of $0 per year. Tess has a 1% chance of experiencing an adverse event and Lex has a 12% chance of experiencing an adverse event. Tess and Lex are both aware of their risk of an adverse event. Assume the social welfare function is the sum of the Tess’ and Lex’s utility functions. Select the correct statement regarding the explanation for what has happened in the private market and the role of social insurance. a.Adverse section has lead to market failure. The government could improve social welfare by providing full insurance and charging the average of actuarially fair premiums. b.Adverse section has lead to market failure. The government could improve social welfare by providing partial insurance at an actuarially fair premium. c.Moral Hazard has lead to market failure. The government…arrow_forwardIf a highway is made safer, the benefit is fewer deaths and injuries. Explain the following two ways that economists put a dollar value on fewer deaths and injuries: (a) revealed preference and (b) contingent valuation.arrow_forwardWhen consumers were given the opportunity to select a package of ground beef labeled “75% lean” or a package of ground beef labeled “25% fat,” most consumers chose “75% lean.” Why? What concept from the chapter does this illustrate? The reason is that consumers are swayed by cheap talk. Cheap talk is the concept. The reason is that consumers are much more likely to choose the alternative framed as the positive option. This is called a framing effect. The reason is that consumers infer the value of a product from positive advertising. This is called inference induction. The reason is that consumers respond better to higher numbers. They feel they are getting more because 75 is greater than 25. The concept is the endowment effect.arrow_forward
- Show how to construct the reference dependent utility function for two friends Kate and Mary whose gains and losses are listed as follows: Kate's net worth is $4.5 million (decreased from $5.5 to $4.5 million) Mary's net worth $3.2 million (increased from $3 to $3.2 million) (First determine the reference point (use a parameter) and then derive reference utility function for each).arrow_forwardRefer to the graph below. It shows 2 indifference curves: for person A and for person B. Which person, A or 4) B, is relatively more likely to take on the risk when the probability of injury at work is 70%? Explain why. Make sure to include the analysis of the difference in the shape of the 2 curves. Be as detailed as possible. Wage UA UB Probability of Injury Figure 1. Indifference Curves of Person A and Person Barrow_forwardAn individual has the following utility function: U = Z!/2 H/2, where Z is a composite good and H is the level of health. The individual has income, m = $100. The price of the composite good, Z, is Pz = 1. The price of health, H, is PH = 4. What is the optimal consumption bundle of H and Z that maximizes utility? Show your steps and show the decision graphically (which includes finding the endpoints of the budget constraint).arrow_forward
- Usamah is stingy and does not care about the welfare of others. Use the indifference curve framework to show the effect of a forced charity on his utility level.arrow_forwardExplain why the Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics implies that there is no intrinsic trade-off between efficiency and interpersonal equity.arrow_forwardConsider two friends Anna and Elsa whose gains and losses are listed as follows: Anna's investment is worth $2.5 million (decreased from $3.5 to $2.5 million) Elsa's investment is worth $2.2 million (increased from $2 to $2.2 million) For cach of them write down the reference utility function (First determine the reference point (use a parameter) and derive reference utility function for each).arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
